Is Nika Maria Conlon redux ? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Is Nika Maria Conlon redux ?

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,788
Reaction Score
8,629
The crazy thing with Nika is that in the beginning of the season she looked like a waste of a scholarship (confused, can't make a simple lay-up, can't shoot, can't guard anyone) and look at her now. She deserves to start every game for the rest of her career. She bring s so much to the game with her energy, defense, shooting when she should be shooting, and most important taking the load of ball handling from Paige which makes Paige the most leathal weapon in WBB.
 

diggerfoot

Humanity Hiker
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,601
Reaction Score
9,038
Then I definitely disagree with you. It was just a matter of time before Muhl earned a starting spot. This wasn't a Pipp.
That's easy to say in hindsight. Muhl did not get a start until both Makurat and Bueckers were out with injuries. She had not played well up until then and was not great during her first start against a bad Georgetown team either. But that first start started giving her abundant game minutes to acclimate. That's all she needed.

If Makurat was not out indefinitely, then Muhl would have continued only getting limited game minutes. Would she still have progressed the same way and bust through the starting line-up before the year was over? Perhaps, but certainly not a given for this year. I assume that's what you meant, for this year. If not, then the golden opportunity that happened for Muhl this year does not apply.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2017
Messages
3,041
Reaction Score
14,438
If I would to ask A'ja Wilson, she would probably say, "let Nika...be Nika"
 

Zorro

Nuestro Zorro Amigo
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
17,920
Reaction Score
15,759
It is unfortunate that all a lot of fans seem to remember about Maria is that 1) she was a pretty good 3 point shooter and 2) she was short and slow. As I recall, she was also one helluva passer and extremely savvy and unflappable. Just wanted to get that in.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
788
Reaction Score
2,625
It is unfortunate that all a lot of fans seem to remember about Maria is that 1) she was a pretty good 3 point shooter and 2) she was short and slow. As I recall, she was also one helluva passer and extremely savvy and unflappable. Just wanted to get that in.
And she was the one who took the free throws for any technical fouls. That speaks to both her ability to make the shot and her ability to handle the pressure of having to do so.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,315
Reaction Score
54,557
The idea that Nika has come out of nowhere in the past 2 weeks is hogwash. Last fall Geno said that AE and Nika were both playing like upperclassmen in practice. He has known what she is capable of for some time.

yes she got off to a slow start. Let’s see season delayed by several weeks bc of CV, injury, and yes oh my gosh maybe some nerves.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
2,861
Reaction Score
18,723
Jen Renzotti has been my comparison. I love the intensity. She will soon be the UConn player that opposing fans love to hate.
Three weeks ago I would have scoffed at the comparison but now I think is right on the money.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
440
Reaction Score
766
Maria was a very good shooter, opened up the court and played well under pressure. The things Geno said were said after she became a starter and in the same vein as Rebecca being the worst center in America.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,315
Reaction Score
54,557
You're all wrong. Clearly Nika is the new Lorin Dixon.
 

psconn

Proud Connecticut WBB Fan
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,239
Reaction Score
14,004
No matter who she brings to mind, she brings the intensity.
1612901002613.png
 

diggerfoot

Humanity Hiker
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,601
Reaction Score
9,038
I cannot disagree with this more. The cream would have risen. She had a late start due to the foot injury.
"I cannot disagree with this more" in reference to a golden opportunity is such an emphatic/dogmatic statement I wonder if we are projecting two different things. I agree that the cream would have risen and before the year was over Muhl's ability would have been evident. But would she have cracked the starting line-up without a golden opportunity? That necessarily means that her fate was within her control alone.

Muhl was never going to take ONO's, Bueckers or Westbrook's spot in the starting line-up. Those are givens. If Makurat performed like she did towards the end of last year Muhl would not be usurping that spot. The offense still ran well with Makurat in there, besides the fact that we now know that, like Muhl, Makurat was dealing with an injury, only Makurat's is worse. An uninjured Makurat performing like the end of last year was not going to lose her starting spot to a freshman. The fact that she did not perform as well and had an injury was an opportunity to fast track Muhl as a starter.

If Williams plays up to her potential there is no way she loses her starting spot. Even though she is erratic that spot still appears safe even now. If it's not safe, that's still an opportunity that is not within Muhl's control. So we are talking about only one starting spot really available.

We then have to factor in Edwards and Griffin, who received opportunities to start before Muhl. Had Griffin not been injured after Bueckers came back would that fifth spot been open to Muhl? That injury was not within Muhl's control.

Maybe I am wrong but I interpret a statement like "I could not disagree more" to mean that what happens to others is irrelevant, Muhl was going to crack the starting line-up even without injuries and/or erratic play from four other players. You can say that about Bueckers. I think such a claim about Muhl requires a little more humility.
 
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
2,160
Reaction Score
10,881
When all is said and done nika will be much closer to Jen R than Maria. Her shot will improve and she is a bulldog.
I agree. CD sees her far more than any of us in practice and she made the Jennifer Rizzotti comparison. Probably not that good, I get it, but when we already have a pretty good comparison regarding her traits, why do we have to find some other player to compare that has little in common with Nika. The best comparison has already been made. I'm sure CD is not elevating Nika to JR's level, rather she is implying that she sees many similar traits in her. I don't think Maria or Molly remind me of Nika at all.
 

EricLA

Cronus
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
15,115
Reaction Score
82,702
No.

Strongly influenced by having seen the Jan '95 UC-TN game recently, I claim that her play strongly resembles that of Ms. Rizzoti.
What a great comparison. I do not recall Jen as a freshman.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,315
Reaction Score
54,557
If Makurat performed like

If Williams plays
Had Griffin not been injured
if, if, if

If Rizzotti were on this team, Nika would not have started.
If CW, AM, and EW replicated the Harlem Globetrotters, Nika would not have started.
If this were 2002, Nika would not have started. Neither would Paige.

I dont understand how all these IFs prove any particular point.

And this of course leaves aside the issue of whether starting is important. It's not. If a player plays well in practice, she will get playing time. Nika did that in the fall as Geno noted. Then she was injured.
 
Last edited:

diggerfoot

Humanity Hiker
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,601
Reaction Score
9,038
I dont understand how all these IFs prove any particular point.
I know from previous topics that there is something about me that rubs you the wrong way and goes beyond rational discussion, so I’ll pass on explaining.
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Messages
736
Reaction Score
4,397
Geez...a couple of weeks ago she was Molly Bent according to some of the posters. I think she has a huge upside as a passer and should continue to improve as an outside shooter and defender. I'd be amazed if she doesn't surpass Conlon's statistical numbers.
 

huskeynut

Leader of the Band
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,121
Reaction Score
29,313
I get why posters have to compare Nika to past players/ stars. I just don't see it as worth all this effort.

Let Nika be Nika. She's tough, scrappy and a royal pain in the butt on defense. She can dish just as well as Paige. She'll pick your pocket for a steal and crash the boards for a rebound. She brings the ball up the court like a heat seeking missile. The purpose is to get the ball in the hoop with the assist and/ or the score. She is relentless. She has no fear. And she's Paige's sister and running mate!!!!!!!!

She may have a little bit of several former greats in her. But she's Nika. And I don't see her coming out of the starting lineup.
 

Online statistics

Members online
335
Guests online
2,020
Total visitors
2,355

Forum statistics

Threads
159,603
Messages
4,197,483
Members
10,066
Latest member
Rjja


.
Top Bottom