If Dave Benedict Doesn't Achieve Something Substantial By End of July Should UConn HIre a Consulting Firm? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

If Dave Benedict Doesn't Achieve Something Substantial By End of July Should UConn HIre a Consulting Firm?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Benedict legit believed UConn would be a lock for AAC football. He's an idiot.

My opinion is that he thought the new ESPN deal would lock UConn in (with the risk of blowing up the deal without the Huskies), so he started shopping the other sports.

Once the news broke, Benedict was left twisting in the wind, because he hadn't found out for sure or made any back up plans (outside of making the locker room tweets).

Herbst then tried to appeal to the other Presidents and they basically gave her a firm no (to put it mildly).

They then laughed their arses off.

There was absolutely no upside to keeping UConn.

Hmm the AP story at the time specifically says UConn leaving triggers a renegotiation of the contract.
The ESPN contract also includes language that would protect the network, should marquee schools, such as UCF, Cincinnati or UConn leave for another conference.
 
Benedict legit believed UConn would be a lock for AAC football. He's an idiot.

My opinion is that he thought the new ESPN deal would lock UConn in (with the risk of blowing up the deal without the Huskies), so he started shopping the other sports.

Once the news broke, Benedict was left twisting in the wind, because he hadn't found out for sure or made any back up plans (outside of making the locker room tweets).

Herbst then tried to appeal to the other Presidents and they basically gave her a firm no (to put it mildly).

They then laughed their arses off.

There was absolutely no upside to keeping UConn.

That isn't my take on it at all.

Benedict HAS to ask. He gets PAID to ask.

Then he moves on.
 
What statements? That he intends to give us no contract rights beyond the rights that we signed on to? The obvious answer is no. You don't gain contract rights because after you elect to terminate it the other side says it has no interest in doing business with you ever again beyond the terms of the contract.

Lol

You sure on this Biz?
 
That isn't my take on it at all.

Benedict HAS to ask. He gets PAID to ask.

Then he moves on.
I agree. DB is doing a much better job than Aresco is at the moment
 
I didn't ask the question right. Sorry. It seems Aresco is talking out both sides of his mouth. In one sense he is saying UConn football is finished after 2019-2020, but that UConn will have to negiotate to leave early since they require 27 months notice. I understand that UConn will in fact have to negiotate since those are the bylaws.

@nelsonmuntz has brought up the point that UConn could sue saying Aresco and the American didn't act in good faith in the contract negotiations giving up UConn's tier 3 rights, specifically in WBB.

@businesslawyer...what should UConn's legal strategy be here?

There is no legal strategy (except suing just to be a jerk and because sometimes jerks get some concessions). You either keep all sports in the AAC for 27 months -- which the AAC can't and isn't going to prevent -- or you negotiate out earlier. I think we've made clear we have no interest in keeping basketball in for two more seasons.
 
Hope AD Dave Benedict can achieve something for UConn football soon. If everything remains up in the air or falls down to the ground, should UConn hire a consulting firm to work with Fox, SNY and the AAC? There are retired ADs and TV executives out there that help colleges in such situations. I am not getting a great feeling based on recent news. Hope I am wrong. The cost of the consultant may pay for itself in intermediate term.
Kind of a silly question. Benedict find a way to get rid of Diaco which was huge. He found a way to get rid of Ollie which was HUGE. UCONN was going nowhere in the AAC. We were rapidly losing fans and apathy was setting in. He got us in the big east and believe it or not we are going to get relevant quickly. Football has to play out and it will.
 
.-.
What statements? That he intends to give us no contract rights beyond the rights that we signed on to? The obvious answer is no. You don't gain contract rights because after you elect to terminate it the other side says it has no interest in doing business with you ever again beyond the terms of the contract.

That is not exactly what Aresco said. He appears to state that UConn will be gone after this year, almost as if the AAC is kicking UConn out.
 
In addition to negotiation, wont Arbitration be required before any potential for lawsuits by either party?
 
Last edited:
There is no legal strategy (except suing just to be a jerk and because sometimes jerks get some concessions). You either keep all sports in the AAC for 27 months -- which the AAC can't and isn't going to prevent -- or you negotiate out earlier. I think we've made clear we have no interest in keeping basketball in for two more seasons.

That is not what the poster is asking.
 
.-.
I
Randy Edsall Retweeted

DIGGS@stefondiggs
43m
43 minutes ago

People don’t appreciate things until they’re gone...
Is Randy talking about being in the AAC or the football team more in general?
 
I agree. DB is doing a much better job than Aresco is at the moment
A ghost and a . Meh. Both can KMFA
 
.-.
Please - just stop. We get it. Your football team got screwed. That's your opinion and its not shared by a whole lot of people.
While screwed at least his point might be too strong a word given how little is known of its future plans.
Since both the current coach and our HOF basketball coach have publicly voiced concern for its future.
That not panic seems to be the logical sentiment.
 
Go listen to his interview today on XM ESPNU radio...it’s more reassuring and the situation make a little more sense. They seem 100% committed to football

Do you have a link? Can't find it.
 
Please - just stop. We get it. Your football team got screwed. That's your opinion and its not shared by a whole lot of people.
and your opinion isn't shared by a whole bunch of other people
you call yourself a hukeynut yet don't consider the football team as your team?
 
.-.
The big thing people are forgetting that I believe @Guapo initially noted is it is going to be expensive for schools to have to produce content on their own for ESPN+. That's the big thing here. And that tweet is wrong because ESPN can renegotiate the deal so that 7.7 ain't happening.

If the PAC-12 is struggling to do it, it is going to be really difficult for the AAC when every school is already subsidizing their AD's as is.
Houston Chronicle said that the loss of Uconn does not trigger contract renegotiations. Aresco states today the league can stay at 11 if they choose to do so. Also, the costs cant be that much to produce content as Sun Belt and Conf USA teams also pay production costs for most sports and those two conf conferences make peanuts.

Everything from todays media reporting indicates that Uconn expected to keep football in the American. Aresco has sat a fat no to that desire. Not sure where Uconn goes Next.
 

I think what is now beginning to emerge is Aresco and Benedict seem to have some fairly long standing animosity between them. Perhaps giving away our Tier 3 rights was Aresco's way of flipping the double eagle bird at Benedict. Yes, we wanted to leave before the media contract was finalized, but Benedict thought he could booze and schmooze Aresco long enough to talk him into some accomodation for keeping football in the AAC.

I Think I know what's coming. We file a lawsuit against the AAC on fiduciary grounds and a total lack of transparency on the media rights deal. The league countersues. Then WWIII breaks out.

This suit will likely be long term and potentially devestating, possibly running easily into millions of dollars in attorney's fees and court costs. Nobody wins.

So early on, you float a trial balloon. You get together with Mr. Aresco, talk about how you don't know why the relationship got out of hand, and you make a proposal to him. UConn stays in the AAC, you can decrease or totally eliminate our annual share of the bowl revenue. We should stand firm on only one point: we should at least get our usual share of the bowl revenue from any bowls we play in. You work out all the other details, lawsuit is over and everybody parts friends.

One other thing that I hesitate to
mention. If Aresco is any good at his job, he'll no doubt mention the exit fee. I think we should agree to pay something, but nowhere near the full 10 million. We did remove our Olympic sports teams, which has a value attached to it. I'd say we offer three, he counters with seven, and we end somewhere in
between, hopefully 4 or 4.50

I think Aresco will go for this if Benedict plays his cards correctly. He could even propose it before filing suit, though in the mood Aresco's in right now Benedict would likely get tossed from the room by a couple of burly Providence wiseguys.

As for selling it to the conference membership, I think Aresco may have one small problem wih that. Assuming they are unanimous in wanting to see UConn in their rear view mirror, they'd all side with Aresco, right? But if the lawsuit is filed, they're then collectively on the hook for the legal fees and expenses. Right now Tulsa is in pretty dire shape financially across the board. The media deal probably greatly favors them. They don't want to see it all get eaten up by endless attorney's fees and costs, and they can't afford it. They're going to want to settle. They will likely talk with SMU and Tulsa, who may also agree, even though the money issue doesn't affect them as badly as Tulsa. If these three schools get together on this, I think we have a good chance to settle it early before it turns into Kevin Ollie, Part II.

This whole mess is just another example of our AD and school administration deciding to do something without thinking it through, like a toddler who slips and falls into the deep end of a pool with no life jacket on.

OK, the story leaked. Hahaha...what a surprise! These stories always leak. Tell somebody something over cocktails at dinner, swear them to secrecy, and then the whole world knows tomorrow. We should have been fully prepared for that contingency. We were not. Same old story. We look like village idiots nationally.

BTW, I think I read somewhere (don't ask me to remember where) that ESPN had decided they won't try to renegotiate the AAC media deal.
 
Last edited:
Hope AD Dave Benedict can achieve something for UConn football soon. If everything remains up in the air or falls down to the ground, should UConn hire a consulting firm to work with Fox, SNY and the AAC? There are retired ADs and TV executives out there that help colleges in such situations. I am not getting a great feeling based on recent news. Hope I am wrong. The cost of the consultant may pay for itself in intermediate term.
One interesting name to help us best navigate the FBS Independent move would be Mike Tranghese, Former Big East commissioner. He also was on the first CFB Playoff committee. He’s 76 now, but has a great mind for college athletics and knows the players in and out. Might be a huge help. Wouldn’t be surprised if they haven’t already spoken with him.
 
One interesting name to help us best navigate the FBS Independent move would be Mike Tranghese, Former Big East commissioner. He also was on the first CFB Playoff committee. He’s 76 now, but has a great mind for college athletics and knows the players in and out. Might be a huge help. Wouldn’t be surprised if they haven’t already spoken with him.

Tranghese was under contract w/ UConn as a consultant starting in 2016. Unaware of the termination date...
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,243
Messages
4,559,663
Members
10,447
Latest member
Theuconnguy


Top Bottom