I hope these gurus were watching the game

[pap49cba]

Had Stanford winning 78-55.

LINK

 

[semper]

Right up there with the quality of their degrees....

 

[speedoo]

They had Stanford going undefeated. Cardinal had a lot of people fooled, but not Geno.

 

[HuskyNan]

Pretty sure those predictions are based on some computer program rather than a human being's best guess.

 

[bruinbball]

Yeah...it also has us beating Baylor by 34.

 

[Phil]

Well, it has us scoring 121 in the next game, so too bad it is so flawed.

 

[Phil]

They predict RU will score 65 against TN. All they need is a 52 point second half.

 

[Wonkster]

Right up there with the quality of their degrees....

Waddya expect? Their "Scouting" rankings are run on a Commodore computer running code written by Al Gorithm.

 

[triaddukefan]

They predict RU will score 65 against TN. All they need is a 52 point second half.

thats embarrassing.... I would hate to be a Rutgers fan.

 

[easttexastrash]

thats embarrassing.... I would hate to be a Rutgers fan.

I hope Ieshia Small is watching this Rutgers' offense and thinking that she wants no part of that. How can any top recruit that is offensive minded think that Rutgers is a good place to go?

 

[HuskyNan]

I hope Ieshia Small is watching this Rutgers' offense and thinking that she wants no part of that. How can any top recruit that is offensive minded think that Rutgers is a good place to go?

C. Viv has brought in many outstanding high school offensive players who somehow forget how to shoot in college. I have been saying for years that all of the fabulous athletes on the RU roster should be running up and down the court as fast and as often as possible, not slowing down the game into a slogging, messy half court affair. Don't know why Stringer doesn't mix things up after years of offensive futility.

 

[Plumber Luigi]

Had Stanford winning 78-55.

LINK

Actually if you click on that prediction the actual prediction was UConn 77 - Stanford 56.

Automatic web page generation is automatic. And wonky sometimes.

 

[DobbsRover2]

Actually if you click on that prediction the actual prediction was UConn 77 - Stanford 56.

Automatic web page generation is automatic. And wonky sometimes.

That is based on stats from yesterday's game as seen by the UConn SOS, however, and clearly there is something wrong with both sides of the computing for that game.

Oddly, except from a tendency to inflate the scoring, the rest of the predictions don't look that off the mark, though UConn's 2nd half of the year defensive pressure will likely turn some of those opponents' 50+ scores into something in the 30s.

 

[MilfordHusky]

Well, it has us scoring 121 in the next game, so too bad it is so flawed.

Geno won't run up the score on fellow Philly guy Westhead; otherwise, 121 looks about right.

 

[meyers7]

Well, it has us scoring 121 in the next game, so too bad it is so flawed.

I'm liking that prediction.
(not sure if we'll give up 51 to Oregon though)

 

[grizz36]

Waddya expect? Their "Scouting" rankings are run on a Commodore computer running code written by Al Gorithm.

Is good old Al still coding? I thought he tripped up and went OOPS!