- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
- Messages
- 1,032
- Reaction Score
- 5,091
-assuming you would get them equivalent to what they did at their best year as a Husky..
Okafor was my first thought, too. But since Amida has so much potential, and (no knock on Facey, love how he's played this year) the 4 is our thinnest and least experienced spot, I thought about our great 4s. A lot of goods ones, but Donyell was the best on the offensive end and frankly our offense has been pretty offensive to me this year.Okafor, if we had low post scoring we would be set
Is that really the natural choice? I agree that he would make the team significantly better, but in this hypothetical situation, you have the option to choose from any player in program history. I wouldn't put him in the top 5 and probably not top ten of former players I'd want for this team.Deandre Daniels should be the natural choice. Its actually slightly painful to think about it.
Rashad Anderson. We need a consistent 3-point threat.
Is that really the natural choice? I agree that he would make the team significantly better, but in this hypothetical situation, you have the option to choose from any player in program history. I wouldn't put him in the top 5 and probably not top ten of former players I'd want for this team.
I would just have a very hard time saying I'd take him over Allen, Kemba, Shabazz, Adrien, Marshall, Caron, Rip, Emeka, Thabeet, etc.I know what your saying but I picked him because he was just left here, he knows the current players , he would be a captain, probably would play the four , and he could hit the three and shoot. Also , He'd be better than he was last year.
If your answer is something other than Kemba or Shabazz, you are simply delusional.
-assuming you would get them equivalent to what they did at their best year as a Husky..