Hurley Suspension? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Hurley Suspension?

I’m fine with his reaction and a suspension if that’s what it takes to put this teams mental frame in the right space next week.

If we’re frustrated on this dumb board, how do you think he feels watching this team stumble their way against Creighton and Marquette in the last couple weeks?
 
RuffRuff said:
You don’t see him bumping the ref? Piece of evidence a few posts up on a still shot
Expand ...
I've watched the clip a bunch of times and honestly, no I do not see the contact. Everyone else sees it so maybe I'm just blind but I see him get in his face but that's it
 
I didn't watch the game, not one person who did said Silas wasn't fouled

My son said he screamed and 1, was disappointed the shot didn't go in and was shocked there was a no call

I don't care if Hurley's suspended, something has to wake this team up
 
.-.
superjohn said:
Refs were fine today. They missed some both ways.

He freaked out because the team played like garbage and just blew the Big East title.
Expand ...
This is exactly it. The official were fine and missed calls, but Hurley was not really angry at the officials per se. He was angry about UConn's lousy play and how it lead to the way the game unfolded and because of that took his anger out on the officials.
 
gsmooth said:
That's exactly why Hurley reacted like he did. He was incredibly frustrated by the play today.
Expand ...
I think he should be more worried about watching a slow motion train wreck play out right in front of him that he has the power to stop but instead did nothing about it.
 
.-.
uconngb said:
I think he should be more worried about watching a slow motion train wreck play out right in front of him that he has the power to stop but instead did nothing about it.
Expand ...
Ok fair enough. I don't think he coached his best game either and I am certainly not excusing his behavior at the end. I was just explaining why it happened. Sure he was angry at the officials at certain points of the game, but the root cause of his anger was not the officiating-it was the lousy play and blowing the Big East regular season title.
 
Last edited:
king conn said:
I think the point of the explosion was, reverse situation and they blow the whistle on UConn

How many times in this game alone did Marquette drive, throw up a shot that missed, we grabbed the rebound and only then did they blow the whistle after we had the ball in our hands. I counted at least 2.
Expand ...
At least 105 times by my count.
 
uconngb said:
Seriously: stop taking 3s when you are shooting 12% and more giving it to the guy shooting 70%. And if you don’t, I have a nice warm seat on the bench for you.

This isn’t rocket science people
Expand ...
Was Hurley out there jacking up clean-look 3’s, clanking them, and not passing it into Reed?

This isn’t 5th grade Church league basketball. These are paid young adult athletes playing their 31st game of the season. If you don’t think they are capable of making proper decisions, I’m not sure what to tell you.

We also only have 4 timeouts a half and Hurley can’t call one every possession to go over the fundamentals of basketball.
 
JustbrewitMan said:
What could he have “coached better” that the team didn’t already know they needed to do.

I’ll hang up and listen
Expand ...
Get the damn ball to Tarris Reed. If he doesn't have things designed to get the ball to him in the paint and the players can't execute getting him the ball in the paint it's on the coach. If you jack up dumb shots instead of getting it to him in the paint you sit.
 
.-.
All the action seems to be to get guys open on the 3 pt line. Only once did we see the cross screen to get someone open down low. Where are the cuts towards to basket
 
superjohn said:
Get the damn ball to Tarris Reed. If he doesn't have things designed to get the ball to him in the paint and the players can't execute getting him the ball in the paint it's on the coach. If you jack up dumb shots instead of getting it to him in the paint you sit.
Expand ...
But by and large, the shots weren’t “dumb”

I will take Mullins, Karaban, and even Solo and Ross taking in rhythm open 3s. They had many today and they didn’t fall.

I will agree that they didn’t do enough to get the ball into Reed in the 2nd half.

Do you REALLY think our coaching staff wasn’t mentioning it to the players during any time outs to also look to get the ball inside, or also not calling plays that involved looks inside?
 
uconngb said:
Seriously: stop taking 3s when you are shooting 12% and more giving it to the guy shooting 70%. And if you don’t, I have a nice warm seat on the bench for you.

This isn’t rocket science people
Expand ...
So under this logic, if a 38-45% 3pt shooter starts the night off 0-2, they should just stop shooting the rest of the night since they are at 0%. Call it a night and hope for a better start the next game.

Sheesh.
 
JustbrewitMan said:
But by and large, the shots weren’t “dumb”

I will take Mullins, Karaban, and even Solo and Ross taking in rhythm open 3s. They had many today and they didn’t fall.

I will agree that they didn’t do enough to get the ball into Reed in the 2nd half.

Do you REALLY think our coaching staff wasn’t mentioning it to the players during any time outs to also look to get the ball inside, or also not calling plays that involved looks inside?
Expand ...
I don't think Tarris ever touched the ball in the last 19 minutes of the game other than getting the ball at the three point line once and driving for a missed layup Ross dunked home.

They either don't have the stuff designed for him to get it in the paint or the players can't execute getting him the ball in the paint, that's on the coach. They had a week to prepare for playing a terrible team.
 
navery12 said:
I've watched the clip a bunch of times and honestly, no I do not see the contact. Everyone else sees it so maybe I'm just blind but I see him get in his face but that's it
Expand ...
This is dumb rationalizing and disingenuous. Why do you think he got ejected immediately? The photo by formerlurker shows Hurley was clearly in the official's personal space and literally as close as a person can be to someone without contact assuming there was no contact. That's a distinction without a difference.

I hope he doesn't get suspended and I am not saying he should or shouldn't be suspended, but we certainly cannot be surprised or outraged if does get suspended.
 
Last edited:
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,537
Messages
4,527,124
Members
10,401
Latest member
TBone9989


Top Bottom