Well said and spot on. Every year in the portal world is a learning experience. I’m still holding out a little hope for the team taking flight and getting hot with Liam back but ok if it doesn’t land. Will be very curious to see how the staff goes to the portal. DH put a lot of stock in continuity and the soph class, and cultural fit and shooting with Mahaney, meanwhile left a big gap in other important areas we’ve all beat down.I'm fine admitting that this team isn't championship caliber. It would have been other-worldly to be a contender again given the amount of talent that has left over the past two seasons. The margin for error on the roster adds was very thin, and we missed on one of them. People seem to have forgotten that winning championships is really hard (which can happen when you basically average a championship every four years over a quarter century).
There are pieces on the roster, and what looks to be a very good freshman class coming in. No reason we can't be back in it next year and the year after if we can supplement well in the portal.
If McNeeley didn't get hurt we would be 15-3, we would be talking about how we haven't lost on the mainland, we would be talking about how great Hass has been, and we would be talking about going 18-3 before our huge top 10 matchup against Marquette.We were never going to have a total reload after 2 chips, we just weren't. Florida went 8-8 in conference and only made the NIT semis after their two championships.
What are our issues?
We're not a bad team. Still top-25 with McNeeley. We're just comparing ourselves to one of the most perfectly constructed rosters of all time last year.
- Total misrecruit of Mahaney
- Too little shot creation on the roster
- low basketball IQ defenders we figured we could coach up... and didn't.
This hurts most, combining with the fact that Danny wanted so much for Samson who stayed over due to loyalty.
- low basketball IQ defenders we figured we could coach up... and didn't.
Idk, there are a few of those on very good teams. Duke obviously, Illinois is off an Elite 8 with a frosh leading them this year. It just takes the right kid and ecosystem. Our vets are better with him out there.It's never a good thing when your freshman is your best player, especially having a veteran Championship roster.
Sure Liam is that good but the principal remains.
Our vets need to step it up or we're not going to 3 peat.
Spoke to Tarris for a bit, in that they need to get the ball into him, etc. Not much on the latter.Did he say anything about why the team is no longer getting Tarris Reed the ball or why plays are being designed to make AK a penetrator?
We were never going to have a total reload after 2 chips, we just weren't. Florida went 8-8 in conference and only made the NIT semis after their two championships.
What are our issues?
We're not a bad team. Still top-25 with McNeeley. We're just comparing ourselves to one of the most perfectly constructed rosters of all time last year.
- Total misrecruit of Mahaney
- Too little shot creation on the roster
- low basketball IQ defenders we figured we could coach up... and didn't.
If McNeeley didn't get hurt we would be 15-3, we would be talking about how we haven't lost on the mainland, we would be talking about how great Hass has been, and we would be talking about going 18-3 before our huge top 10 matchup against Marquette.
Great point. Other than the Dayton game, our losses have been all one to two possession games.If McNeeley didn't get hurt we would be 15-3, we would be talking about how we haven't lost on the mainland, we would be talking about how great Hass has been, and we would be talking about going 18-3 before our huge top 10 matchup against Marquette.
I agree it's not fair to say the defensive problems are all attributed to being soft, lack of will, etc. , but it is causing a lot of the issues on defense. The other is lack of BBall IQ and/or the coaching staff trying to implement schemes these players are not capable of executing and/or the players not digesting the information from scouting reports. The defensive positioning has improved since Maui, but it is still not good. The Providence game at Gampel is one example. Providence was basically playing 1-on-1 against UConn's defenders in the paint because the other 4 UConn defenders had their backs to everyone else and were for the most part face guarding the PC players behind the arc. That was not necessary. Look at Marquette against PC at the AMP. It's possible to play help defense without giving up the 3s. They held PC to 50 pts while the UConn had defensive rating of 114.7 against PC at Gampel.Its just so not fair to say these defensive problems are will, hunger, and softness issues that other teams didn’t have when the other team had the best rim protector this decade.
Guys from last year’s team did not look like great defenders when Clingan was out. Cam Spencer especially got abused on drives (and it wasn’t a “want to thing” because the effort was there)
Inexact science in short window with NIL complications trying to figure out who is motivated, who will fit the system. The one guy getting it right is Barnes, and the common theme has been plucking a mid major on the rise. Those kids probably see it as an opportunity. Hurley's selection this year with two rising juniors was also interesting, where he could have went out and gotten guys that were already men with maturity in that last Covid/redshirt year, guys like Sion James. When you look at this team now, that feels exactly what it needs. Brawn, maturity, doggedness.Yea, using the portal is proving to not be as "can't miss" as people would think.
Every season has had some "sure fire hits" turn into absolute busts and wastes of NIL money.
Let's be honest, Hunter Dickinson has been a huge disappointment for Kansas x 2 seasons now (for what he should have brought to that team).
Timberlake was a big bust.
Coleman Hawkins has been one of the biggest wastes of NIL money in the history of NIL so far.
Oumar Ballo has put up some good stats but has brought apathy and poor attitude to Indiana.
That Providence gameplan sounds like a reaction to our defensive three point shooting woes. I agree there’s probably a better way to do it, but that way is a way that if you wanted to sell out on stopping just 3 point shooting should work.I agree it's not fair to say the defensive problems are all attributed to being soft, lack of will, etc. , but it is causing a lot of the issues on defense. The other is lack of BBall IQ and/or the coaching staff trying to implement schemes these players are not capable of executing and/or the players not digesting the information from scouting reports. The defensive positioning has improved since Maui, but it is still not good. The Providence game at Gampel is one example. Providence was basically playing 1-on-1 against UConn's defenders in the paint because the other 4 UConn defenders had their backs to everyone else and were for the most part face guarding the PC players behind the arc. That was not necessary. Look at Marquette against PC at the AMP. It's possible to play help defense without giving up the 3s. They held PC to 50 pts while the UConn had defensive rating of 114.7 against PC at Gampel.
As far as last year's team, of course they were much better defenisively with Clingan. They held it together defensively while Clingan was out, so they were solid defenders, Cam not so much early on but he improved greatly. This partially includes the Creighton game at Gampel where Clingan did not start, but was effective off the bench. They held Creighton to their lowest points scored in a game last year at 48 pts.