Where we won a NC.at the very end he couldn't help but chuckle while saying the University of Connecticut heads to dallas for the conference tourney
point?Where we won a NC.
Why was he chuckingly? Dallas is a place where we have played great.point?
It's funny that we travel so far to play a conference tourney. Someone may know this, but I don't: Besides Hawaii, what is the furthest any team travels to play their conference tourney? This has to be close to the top.Why was he chuckingly? Dallas is a place where we have played great.
It's funny that we travel so far to play a conference tourney. Someone may know this, but I don't: Besides Hawaii, what is the furthest any team travels to play their conference tourney? This has to be close to the top.
among the power conferences plus UConn:It's funny that we travel so far to play a conference tourney. Someone may know this, but I don't: Besides Hawaii, what is the furthest any team travels to play their conference tourney? This has to be close to the top.
Why was he chuckingly? Dallas is a place where we have played great.
Getting in line for ticketsMSG next year baby!
Awesome work. Thank you!among the power conferences plus UConn:
miami > greensboro = 824
wvu > kansas city= 895 miles
UW > vegas= 1,069
UConn > dallas= 1,704
For the record...what does chuckingly even mean?Why was he chuckingly? Dallas is a place where we have played great.
Can’t say I disagree with that assessment. Love Akok, but losing him wasn’t the disaster many thought it would be.Always interesting to hear the opposing coaches view after a loss to us. Sampson said the turning point for us was when Akok went out it forced us to play Whaley more who he said makes more winning plays, that Akok will get there but right now Whaley is much better.
Can’t say I disagree with that assessment. Love Akok, but losing him wasn’t the disaster many thought it would be.
Can’t say I disagree with that assessment. Love Akok, but losing him wasn’t the disaster many thought it would be.
Whaley brings aggressiveness and smarts on D, Whaley has an offensive game - something Akok lacksDisagree, we only have three bigs, there were plenty of minutes for Whaley alongside Carlton and Akok.
But kudos to Whaley for stepping up big time.
I agree that Whaley contributes more than Akok at this point (against most opponents, perhaps not all). But we'd be better off having all three than just two, even if it meant a modest reduction in Whaley's minutes.Whaley brings aggressiveness and smarts on D, Whaley has an offensive game - something Akok lacks
Akok is a great shot blocker but needs so much refinement
One has to wonder where this team would be if Pork Chop was given more of a chance the whole season.
Awesome work. Thank you!
Always interesting to hear the opposing coaches view after a loss to us. Sampson said the turning point for us was when Akok went out it forced us to play Whaley more who he said makes more winning plays, that Akok will get there but right now Whaley is much better.
I think people are more concerned about what the loss of Akok means for next year or beyond.
Whaley brings aggressiveness and smarts on D, Whaley has an offensive game - something Akok lacks
Akok is a great shot blocker but needs so much refinement
One has to wonder where this team would be if Pork Chop was given more of a chance the whole season.
That is 100% true, but it's not all of it. Carlton, with no foul trouble last night, only played 15 minutes or so. So Whaley being a huge improvement over Akok, as startling as that is, is part of it, but the move to playing most of the game with 4 guards and 1 big has also been a huge part of it. I've been a proponent of defensive is underrated most of my life, but this team is making me reevaluate it. While I thought they played really well defensively last night, since the Akok injury we have been a far worse defensive team, and yet we've more than made up on it by being a far more efficient offensive team. last night we made over half of our 2 point FG attempts. I can't remember the last time we did that.
I think this has always been reference to Sid and Alterique not being 100% healthwise. He mentioned something about Alterique only being 80% at gametime.Am I the only one who thinks that his constant public reference to Sid being half a player, "we can play sid for a few minutes, which gives us 7.5 players" a little degrading? If I were Sid it would piss me off to be honest. Maybe it's a coaching tactic.
I took that 1/2 player to be mainly a reference to Al's balky back. He said he didn't know until 35 minutes before the game that Al would be able to play, and that the trainer told him Al was only around 80%. So basically, with the combination of Al's limitations and the limited minutes you can expect from Sid, it's probably worth 1 1/2 players between the two of them.Am I the only one who thinks that his constant public reference to Sid being half a player, "we can play sid for a few minutes, which gives us 7.5 players" a little degrading? If I were Sid it would piss me off to be honest. Maybe it's a coaching tactic.
And with that 2400 miles of travel, their conference allows them to schedule appropriately as to limit the effects of traveling so far each year. They essentially play the non-conference at home, with usually 1 P5 game on the road, then they have the Diamond Head Classic in December. In conference, they play 2 at home, 2 on the road. The road games are 2 days apart in close vicinity. It helps their players get used to one week travel, one week home. UConn gets no such special travel treatment. If i had more time, i could try to count up the travel miles Hawaii vs UConn have each year, but probably wont add much to our argument, since we all agree UConn travels too much.And Hawai’i only 700 miles further to their conference site in LA (2400 miles total)