Maybe. I always thought he had a good amount of offensive potential. But he was comically bad on defense. I don't know if that was coaching, effort, or just an inability to learn the system and make the correct reads.Cobb would have been a hell of a player if he’d had the right coach in his ear from day one.
You mean at South Carolina? Or Chipola? Or here under Ollie?Cobb would have been a hell of a player if he’d had the right coach in his ear from day one.
IW's foot speed & ability to get off the floor are impressive for a guy his size, he hedges hard like few big's can and goes up to attempt a block then right back up for the board fast. Like CV, his effort & will are visible to all, as fans you have to admire the work he has done & effort he puts on display. If he can improve the consistency of his mid-range jumper he will be tough to take off the floor next year.
He keeps track of his own man when he does hedge, you can see it in his eyes.I would add it's not just the hard hedge, it's his ability to recover and get back I position after he hedges.
The main thing is he doesn't just hedge to hedge. It's purposeful, he goes hard after the ball. He is very disruptive and has forced a number of steals. The pressure is real. Whaley creates a strong double team that puts the offensive player in real trouble.I would add it's not just the hard hedge, it's his ability to recover and get back I position after he hedges.
Great point. I think Whaley is an extremely motivated kid and worked his a.. off to get to where he is. He added strength and a little mid range jumper. Excited to see his next improvements.He massively improved during the off season, it's all about Whaley accepting the challenge, he wasn't that player as a sophomore.
I agree. And it seemed like he was getting a good read on his guys, he wasn't one to go flying in the air on a pump fake.
I was just about to add something similar.Also even when he began this past year playing better he still found foul trouble easily. But when he knew he needed to play more minutes as Polley then Akok went down he was smart enough to keep the hands out. He stayed out of major foul trouble the last 8-10 games by being smarter, thats a nice sign too.
I don't think so, or at least not likely. He had physical ability but showed little understanding of team play, and didn't work hard enough off the court (aerobic fitness) to show more on the court. Those characteristics are internal, and it's very hard for external efforts to make a dent in them.Cobb would have been a hell of a player if he’d had the right coach in his ear from day one.
Is that a KenPom data point?Altered shots that don't earn a player a block in the box score are frequently mentioned. Whaley gets about 4 of the steal equivalents to that per game.
Love what Whaley did and his potential next year but let’s not forget that Carlton was on the verge of breakout after 18/19. I figured him for best center in the AAC last year. Didn’t work that way did it?
I was half kidding. Whaley will shine next season and who knows, maybe we get the good Josh back.Good point, but it feels like Whaley is still on the rise. I would guess that Whaley has a very good Senior season, while I am honestly not so sure about Josh.
The main argument is that he was too raw but there’s no way he was a worse option than Adams or Sid(both ended up playing significant minutes)in the post. He showed signs freshman year.So the broad consensus seems to be that he needed to put on some muscle and put in the work to get on the court, and there is something to that. But in my opinion what makes Whaley the player he is, can't be easily taught. The guy is a basketball player. He has a great awareness of where everyone else is on the court, and where they are likely to go. He's six nine and makes great passes on a fast break, he make crazy good bang-bang passes out of the post.
So kudo's to Hurly for challenging him to improve, but I'm not sure he recognized what he had the first season.
The main argument is that he was too raw but there’s no way he was a worse option than Adams or Sid(both ended up playing significant minutes)in the post. He showed signs freshman year.
It had to be something that he was doing that put him in the dog house. Maybe nursing the injury too long and not practicing, or not practicing hard when he got back or something that rubbed Coach the wrong way initially.
I generally like your insight but I can't quite figure out why you hate on Hurley so oftenThe main argument is that he was too raw but there’s no way he was a worse option than Adams or Sid(both ended up playing significant minutes)in the post. He showed signs freshman year.
It had to be something that he was doing that put him in the dog house. Maybe nursing the injury too long and not practicing, or not practicing hard when he got back or something that rubbed Coach the wrong way initially.
At any rate we have an absolute beast of a forward returning next year now so whatever happened it worked.
I love Hurley lol. He can be questioned at times, it’s healthy.I generally like your insight but I can't quite figure out why you hate on Hurley so often