- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 6,996
- Reaction Score
- 17,742
The best player in wcbb - Paige- is not going get anything less than 29 minutes.
Any lineup in a big game that takes out the best player in wcbb and possibly Azzi is just as good if not better - without keeping one in --is a horrible idea.
Just because we say "press the other team" doesn't mean it's going to work. And there's a possibility that this "press team" costs you the game. And to think as the coach you're getting all these superstars and you go back on the recruiting trail trying to get the next Paige - how do you think they will react that you sat not only one but 2 superstars in a huge game which your move clearly cost the team the game?
You think "the next Paige" is going to want to play knowing her coach is going to sit her or another superstar instead of "letting at least one of them play?"
What you're suggesting is reckless imo.
What if Geno created a designated “press team” and played them at strategically appropriate times during the game? With the incredible depth of this team it seems to me that having a rotating “press” squad of Aubrey, Mir, Nika, Christyn, and Liv say, that would come in and press full court, balls to the wall for 3 minutes, disrupt the other team completely, then bring the offensive team back in until the next strategic moment and then repeat. The players wouldn’t have to be locked in to those roles, we have enough talent where they could rotate in and out of the press team and assuming they are good enough offensively, they could rotate on the offensive team as well. I’m certainly not saying which players would be best suited for the pressing role or how often to implement it, just that it seems possible that it could be an effective way to utilize all the talent we are going to have over the next three - five years. Thoughts?
Any lineup in a big game that takes out the best player in wcbb and possibly Azzi is just as good if not better - without keeping one in --is a horrible idea.
Just because we say "press the other team" doesn't mean it's going to work. And there's a possibility that this "press team" costs you the game. And to think as the coach you're getting all these superstars and you go back on the recruiting trail trying to get the next Paige - how do you think they will react that you sat not only one but 2 superstars in a huge game which your move clearly cost the team the game?
You think "the next Paige" is going to want to play knowing her coach is going to sit her or another superstar instead of "letting at least one of them play?"
What you're suggesting is reckless imo.
Last edited: