- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 7,032
- Reaction Score
- 17,938
They were not "dominant" last year in the Big East. And this year's team has among the lowest floors. This is the year they can get picked off from wnning the reg. season but that's doubtful; if just one of the team's in the Big East is better than the rest then expect a dogfight with UCONN coming out on top but not in a dominating way. ; if no title-worthy opponent happens and UCONN wins convincingly - then-- great. However they are probably going to have some games where we say "they aren't very good . . . " The questions isn't as much as the opponent, but the fact that UCONN isn't as strong which means some "ugly" performance games more-than-likely (of which they can win ofc but still "ugly.)".A lot of this is semantics, but I certainly wouldn't say we “dominated” the Big East last year. We had a rough and ragged February where we lost to Marquette and St. John's and won several close games, including against Georgetown and (gulp) Xavier. We won the regular season by a mere one game.
To me the more apt question isn't “is our dominance safe?” but rather “can we re-establish our dominance?”
On the flipside UCONN doesn't need to be dominant to win the Big East but then a few years from now if one were to look back and see how UCONN won so many reg, season titles the comment would be "they were dominant" despite some of the games being very close with title-on-the-line.