How long before CBS dumps Kellogg for Kerr?

[Vowelguy]

Steve Kerr is an awesome analyst, while Clark Kellogg is becoming less and less coherent.

 

[jrazz12]

He's just clueless. He's rambling on about this or that and completely missing what's going on on the court

 

[mauconnfan]

I like Steve Kerr but better than Clark? Huh?

 

[UC990411]

20 minutes

 

[aceboon]

Kerr does the Final 4 anyway but yea Kellog is terrible. I don't like Nantz as a #1 guy myself, there are plenty much better, the guy doesn't call a game all season and then shows up for the Big 10 tourney and re-assumes the top spot year after year.

 

[champs99and04]

Kerr does the Final 4 anyway but yea Kellog is terrible. I don't like Nantz as a #1 guy myself, there are plenty much better, the guy doesn't call a game all season and then shows up for the Big 10 tourney and re-assumes the top spot year after year.

Yeah, Nantz just doesn't seem like a huge college basketball guy to me. I think he loves the NFL and the Masters, but I'm not sure his passion for college basketball is at that level. I guess CBS doesn't really have any better options though.

 

[ford82]

Kerr is way better than Kellogg.

 

[pepband99]

Forget about Kellogg, what about Lundquist? Time for pasture...

 

[nelsonmuntz]

WTF is that thing on Craig Sager's head?

 

[James]

Kerr and Kellogg together is the best. Like the big ten tourney, or nba 2k13

 

[uconnfan68]

Forget about Kellogg, what about Lundquist? Time for pasture...

Love Verne and Bill Rafftery together. Nothing like an eye-opener (or 2) before the game.

 

[Mr. Wonderful]

I like Kellogg. Kerr is ok, but not significantly better than Kellogg, if at all.

Jim Nantz is the weak link in the broadcast.

 

[dtrumpet]

I'm sure its just my big east bias, but any game is better when Raftery does it.
and nantz is a weak link, Gus Johnson did a much better job when he was at cbs.