Crazy creative stuff for him and Luke to apply what an offensive coordinator who became a Head Coach in the NFL(Shanahan) is doing to confuse the defense with offensive sets to his approach to CBB. Throw a little Euro and NBA styles- You got UConn CBB. Everyone else is playing catch upis it the same offense? No. not close. Based on what he said to Katz the other day, have they seen tape of the offense and found some part of it they may utilize at times? Almost surely. He pretty much said the coaching staff will watch anything they can get their hands on for ideas they can play around with.
I may be off on this (like entirely) - but it is my casual understanding that in broad terms Geno runs his own version of the Princeton offense and it has evolved even more over the years. Meanwhile, Europeans also evolved their own version of the Princeton offense and the men's side runs their version of the European-based evolved "Princeton offense" complete with analytics.
So they would look similar as they have the same root.
Yeah I was trying to learn more about this a couple weeks back when looking into our offense and was watching some videos and there are several videos of Geno Auriemma chin series plays. And many of them are recent with Paige. So there's certainly a small subset of our playbook that is similar to theirs, but who is to say where the origin of that was. More likely than getting it from Geno we implemented it because it's well known and is easy to get into DHO/Zoom from.The whole Chin series we run is adapted from the Princeton offense. It's kind of old school in a way. But the actual product really doesn't look like Princeton any more.
We still didnt get the attention deserved of the accomplishment. BSPN was too busy hyping Catlin Clark and how great the womens game was and people totally bought into it. If the topic was cbb she got at least double the coverage in losing than we did in winning.Recruiting better shooters and more offensive talent.
Hiring Murray is a huge reason. And Murray, Hurley, Kimani are all improving every year. Hurley is a student of the game and constantly trying to improve.
After winning in 23 we never got the full media attention from winning a chip. And at Uconn, we usually don't get the excessive hype. But after B2B it's a totally new level of respect.
Would you at least agree that if all players on the Women's team were healthy, they could have beaten the Pistons?With all due respect, not at all.
We are very lucky.
Some of our fans are embarrassing.
The emojis are better because they project powerfully self-certain criticism upon no identified or communicated basis, while masking his poor writing skills.Keep throwing those laugh-crying emojis on every mention of Geno, that'll show 'em
Don't copycat his inept use of "embarrassing." Let his writing fail on its own.What's embarrassing is that you think a Hall of Fame coach has nothing to offer.
Constant motion, cutting, and multiple picks, screens.... creating wide open looks and layups
I'm not sure how anyone can miss the similarities
The whole Chin series we run is adapted from the Princeton offense. It's kind of old school in a way. But the actual product really doesn't look like Princeton any more.
Same as Tom Moore, a pair of dues paying basketball junkies. No silver spoons in those BLUE BLOODSIt's amazing that Luke Murray didn't even play D1 basketball, correct? He was just a high school player, I believe.
Once John Mara started making decisions the downfall beganBeing a UConn is great. It cleanses my palette of being a NY Giants fan and watching their front office ineptitude since the 2nd SB win over the Patriots (really it started before that SB.
That is just not true. Whaley gave 100%. So did Cole. So did others. The problem was a talent gap, not an attitude gap. Replace Cole with Newton and Whaley with Clinton and those teams are completely different. You can have the most complex offense in the country. If you don’t have the guys who can run it, and you don’t use them correctly, it ain’t getting you anything.We forget that at the beginning of his tenure, Hurley had to devote basically his entire coaching to effort and toughness. Forget BBIQ, forget sophisticated plays, he had his hands full getting guys to give max effort all game.
I love how this board reduces everything to the absurd. Either Hurley isn't even aware that Geno Auriemma exists, or he has copied his entire playbook. It wouldn't surprise me in the least, among the myriad of things that Hurley consumes in order to improve his coaching, he has looked at and talked to GA. Coaches routinely steal from each other and no one is particularly shy about admitting that. It's part of the process. But, absolutely, they're working off of common principles.Yeah I was trying to learn more about this a couple weeks back when looking into our offense and was watching some videos and there are several videos of Geno Auriemma chin series plays. And many of them are recent with Paige. So there's certainly a small subset of our playbook that is similar to theirs, but who is to say where the origin of that was. More likely than getting it from Geno we implemented it because it's well known and is easy to get into DHO/Zoom from.
Our turnover in personnel makes that a little more difficult. Sure, we will be using the same principles, but, we will have new pieces and be using existing pieces in different different ways.I think the most fascinating thing about the upcoming season will be finding out what other coaches have come up with defensively in order to slow the Husky Train down. And then, of course, how we adjust to their adjustments.
Hurley stated he used to focus on only defense, but the back2back early exits from the tourney forced him to change his philosophy, to focus more on offense.I’m not an X and O guy like many of you, but I remember in the early Hurley days, a lot of complaints about our offense and how we just ran a weave and high hedge endlessly. Now, anlmost overnight, we run the best offense in CBB.
Is it the players, is Hurley evolving, is Murray a mad offensive scientist, is it the cultural buy-in? Am I answering my own question by saying it’s all of the above?
I don’t know how they would adjust. UConn forces teams to make decisions when playing defense, and when they make the wrong decision, we get alley oops or wide open 3’s.I think the most fascinating thing about the upcoming season will be finding out what other coaches have come up with defensively in order to slow the Husky Train down. And then, of course, how we adjust to their adjustments.
Please don't say that to a COVID sufferer...To be honest, it’s all been a fever dream
Cole didn't arrive until his 3rd year. Whaley gave 100%...because Hurley cranked the intensity up to 11 and demanded the team follow suit.That is just not true. Whaley gave 100%. So did Cole. So did others. The problem was a talent gap, not an attitude gap. Replace Cole with Newton and Whaley with Clinton and those teams are completely different. You can have the most complex offense in the country. If you don’t have the guys who can run it, and you don’t use them correctly, it ain’t getting you anything.
I actually like the Villanova example. That I do think influenced Hurley’s thinking. They won with a big and 4 guys out. But I also think figuring out how to use guys in any system is important. Jackson is Exhibit A. Teams didn’t even bother covering him at the 3-point line. It took a while before Hurley figured out he could be effective inside rebounding and scoring rather than trying to play as a 3rd guard. He became sort of Samson Johnson type scorer rather than a Deep threat.
Once a Mara started making football decisions the return to the Wilderness Years (brought on by Mara's making football decisions) began.Once John Mara started making decisions the downfall began
Hmmm? A good blueprint for UConn football. The defensive approach ain't doing squat.After the loss to New Mexico in the NCAAT Hurley decided we needed to focus and ramp up our offense. So he hired Luke Murray and recruited offensive talent.