Highlights v. NJIT | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Highlights v. NJIT

Too many forced passes within the paint that turn into turnovers. This has been an issue all season. New Rule: if you have possession of the ball inside the paint and below the foul line, shoot the damn ball.
 
the first year was year 1. at the end of year 9 the decade of the 10's started it was the first decade of 10 full years. the first decade was only nine years because there is no year 0. (i think)
 
Probably not. But when some guy started counting he figured it out ;)
 
He goes up without a dribble more frequently than most, though he does need to go up stronger.

What do you intend by calling yourself "Best Poster?"
He goes up, just not too high. I don't know if I seen another guy his size finish under the rim as much as he does. Do you think if he went stronger, he would get more lift?
 
.-.
He goes up, just not too high. I don't know if I seen another guy his size finish under the rim as much as he does. Do you think if he went stronger, he would get more lift?
I give this one over to the coaching staff and hope for good outcomes.
 
He goes up without a dribble more frequently than most, though he does need to go up stronger.
I was talking about the "flushing" part. He does frequently dribble/spin into incredibly difficult shots for himself. But of course he goes up sometimes without dribbling, he literally only takes shots around the rim.
 
I was talking about the "flushing" part. He does frequently dribble/spin into incredibly difficult shots for himself. But of course he goes up sometimes without dribbling, he literally only takes shots around the rim.
Fair enough.
My version is that he's he the rare big who goes straight up without putting it on the floor.
That said, he doesn't go up high or strong, which is a a coach-identified issue that is getting attention
 
the first year was year 1. at the end of year 9 the decade of the 10's started it was the first decade of 10 full years. the first decade was only nine years because there is no year 0. (i think)

If the first year was 1, and if the next year with a 1 is year 11, which comes ten years after year 1, then doesn't that prove that year 10 is the end of the first decade?
 
Colloquially a decade is a period you refer to by its number, ie the 80s, 90s, etc..

bUt aCtUaLlY tHe nEw MillENiUM sTaRTeD iN 2001
 
If the first year was 1, and if the next year with a 1 is year 11, which comes ten years after year 1, then doesn't that prove that year 10 is the end of the first decade?
Of course you are correct literal definition of a decade. It is any ten year span, i.e., 1998 to 2008 is a decade. Also in the vernacular is a grouping of years beginning with a 0. but we've already nerded this thing to death.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,264
Messages
4,560,439
Members
10,452
Latest member
WashingtonH


Top Bottom