Highlights v. NJIT

[Get a Job]

If you want to get technical every year is the beginning (and end, for that matter) of a decade, which is simply a consecutive 10 year period. In the popular parlance decades begin with the years that end in 0.

 

[SixRings]

Difficult to figure this team out. It wasn’t an impressive win today despite winning by over 20. It was sloppy for most of it. AG was in his turnover machine mode, Carlton could’ve had 20 dunks but had none that I can remember, and the rest just played okay sans CV who hit some shots and played well. Seems that time off hurts this group, more so than other teams. Cincinnati will be a good test and I think they’ll play with some rhythm that they lacked today because they played today.

 

[AntG168]

CV and rique combined for 3 to. Sloppy? Today was business like. We did what we were supposed to. Nothing to see here

 

[SixRings]

Disagree. They couldn’t get much offensive rhythm going. They have a lot more size and talent than NJIT but never got it going. Too many turnovers and bad shots. Akok also played well along with CV. I’m optimistic they’ll play better against tougher opposition and less time off.

 

[Seamus84]

every decade is a decade except for the first one which was 9 years.

???

 

[MilliniumPrince]

Too many forced passes within the paint that turn into turnovers. This has been an issue all season. New Rule: if you have possession of the ball inside the paint and below the foul line, shoot the damn ball.

 

[HuskylnSC]

???

the first year was year 1. at the end of year 9 the decade of the 10's started it was the first decade of 10 full years. the first decade was only nine years because there is no year 0. (i think)

 

[Hans Sprungfeld]

He can't.

He goes up without a dribble more frequently than most, though he does need to go up stronger.

What do you intend by calling yourself "Best Poster?"

 

[Hans Sprungfeld]

every decade is a decade except for the first one which was 9 years.

Did they even know it was 0 at the time?

 

[HuskylnSC]

Probably not. But when some guy started counting he figured it out

 

[HuskylnSC]

He goes up without a dribble more frequently than most, though he does need to go up stronger.

What do you intend by calling yourself "Best Poster?"

He goes up, just not too high. I don't know if I seen another guy his size finish under the rim as much as he does. Do you think if he went stronger, he would get more lift?

 

[Hans Sprungfeld]

He goes up, just not too high. I don't know if I seen another guy his size finish under the rim as much as he does. Do you think if he went stronger, he would get more lift?

I give this one over to the coaching staff and hope for good outcomes.

 

[Huskyforlife]

He goes up without a dribble more frequently than most, though he does need to go up stronger.

I was talking about the "flushing" part. He does frequently dribble/spin into incredibly difficult shots for himself. But of course he goes up sometimes without dribbling, he literally only takes shots around the rim.

 

[Hans Sprungfeld]

I was talking about the "flushing" part. He does frequently dribble/spin into incredibly difficult shots for himself. But of course he goes up sometimes without dribbling, he literally only takes shots around the rim.

Fair enough.
My version is that he's he the rare big who goes straight up without putting it on the floor.
That said, he doesn't go up high or strong, which is a a coach-identified issue that is getting attention

 

[Watchdog]

the first year was year 1. at the end of year 9 the decade of the 10's started it was the first decade of 10 full years. the first decade was only nine years because there is no year 0. (i think)

If the first year was 1, and if the next year with a 1 is year 11, which comes ten years after year 1, then doesn't that prove that year 10 is the end of the first decade?

 

[krinklecut]

Colloquially a decade is a period you refer to by its number, ie the 80s, 90s, etc..

bUt aCtUaLlY tHe nEw MillENiUM sTaRTeD iN 2001

 

[HuskylnSC]

If the first year was 1, and if the next year with a 1 is year 11, which comes ten years after year 1, then doesn't that prove that year 10 is the end of the first decade?

Of course you are correct literal definition of a decade. It is any ten year span, i.e., 1998 to 2008 is a decade. Also in the vernacular is a grouping of years beginning with a 0. but we've already nerded this thing to death.

 

[Waquoit]

Did they even know it was 0 at the time?

They didn't even have decades yet.

 

[BNich]

Was there any crowd there?

I was there so yes. 10,000 plus is the reported number.