Despite her won-loss record and the praise given to her, I have never been impressed with Donovan as a coach. IMO, the Sun management made a huge mistake hiring her.
Despite her won-loss record and the praise given to her, I have never been impressed with Donovan as a coach. IMO, the Sun management made a huge mistake hiring her.
I understand a good won-loss record is not the important measure of a coach. Nor is winning a championship. But why was Mike, who had a pretty good won-loss record and NO championship, a better coach?
I'm not defending Donovan nor the Sun's season. The team she inherited has suffered injuries and seems not to have the inner fortitude to work together and through the challenges those injuries have presented.
But there were many folks who thought M.T. had lost the team's ear and could not, like a certain Devil coach, win "the big one." Is that what folks want from a coach?
I understand a good won-loss record is not the important measure of a coach. Nor is winning a championship. But why was Mike, who had a pretty good won-loss record and NO championship, a better coach?
I'm not defending Donovan nor the Sun's season. The team she inherited has suffered injuries and seems not to have the inner fortitude to work together and through the challenges those injuries have presented.
But there were many folks who thought M.T. had lost the team's ear and could not, like a certain Devil coach, win "the big one." Is that what folks want from a coach?
What is bothersome to me is that I've not yet seen anything resembling a team offense. My wife even commented last night that it appears the Sun's offensive scheme involves throwing the ball to somebody and seeing what they can do one-on-one. Missed shots are one thing, not running an offense is a completely different kettle of fish