intlzncster
i fart in your general direction
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 28,930
- Reaction Score
- 60,232
nasty move mid paint from last night? That was hilarious and I'd love to see it again.
that hurt my eyes...nasty move mid paint from last night? That was hilarious and I'd love to see it again.
that hurt my eyes...
I'd like to see a gif of Napier with the invisible red cloth matador dance move he made defending that particular one Stanford fast break. He went under and through so easily (with no shame, I might add).I think it would be some nice light hearted humor at this stage. Although the anti Nolan brigade might have a field day.
Here you go:
Gotta give him credit - he never lifted his pivot foot!
That is very true. PN is actually doing so good things out there but has not yet put it together. On one play he aggressive attacked the hoop but back-rimmed the dunk.Gotta give him credit - he never lifted his pivot foot!
If he just steps towards the hoop after the first head fake he would have had a layupHere you go:
If he just steps towards the hoop after the first head fake he would have had a layup
Oh No you didn't!!That move is only 450 not 630.
Somebody with puter skills needs to add either the Benny Hill theme song or the Three Stooges Curly bwu-bwu-bwu-bwu noise to this video to really do it justice.Here you go:
Or the Peppermint TwistSomebody with puter skills needs to add either the Benny Hill theme song or the Three Stooges Curly bwu-bwu-bwu-bwu noise to this video to really do it justice.
It looked like he turned fully once, then a 3/4 turn after. So 360+270 = 630. Maybe my observation is off on the movement. Regardless of whether I'm right or wrong (and it's probably the latter), the subject matter alone makes this the most amusing debate I've ever participated in.Oh No you didn't!!
Sounds like you guys are having a trigonometry debate...rare sight on the Boneyard!...or did I go off on a tangent?