What I don't get, and it's probably not worth the effort pondering, is how UK fans can retaliate, constantly, with Cal being "clean" b/c he was never proven to be "guilty" of any of his schools past discretions yet say that JC is slimy. JC was never, to my knowledge, found guilty of anything other than not having "control"; the same thing that Cal was found "guilty" of. So how can they with a straight face say that Cal is this clean guy caught in circumstances but then call out JC as a cheater and shady? They ALWAYS do it. Boggles my mind. If you want to play the Cal didn't do anything wrong angle, then you have to do the same thing with JC, right?