Great news on Crystal in Italy..!!! | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Great news on Crystal in Italy..!!!

It is true that things have changed and, I doubt that she was told 'you will be a starter here regardless of the situation. That is the true fate of a transfer. I think she is up there with our best players. And I doubt that the Uconn staff will be willing to give Duke the last laugh, so much is at stake, including her development.
I have also watched a couple of the Fifa's U18 games. Whilst it's true that Crystal has taken on a leadership role and things go smoothly (or more so) when she is on the floor, I have not seen any new development in her defensive abilities. Indeed, on a few occasions she had trouble keeping the guarded player in front of her. That part of her game will have to improve if she wants a starting spot and, she may have competition. On another player- the recruit C. Williams. She seems very good at just about everything (and confidence); but, she shoots a lot.
 
I don't know what the big deal is about who starts, particularly at the beginning of the season. Geno will play whatever mix of players he thinks it will take to win, in whatever role he thinks will work and I doubt he gives a rodent's hindquarters who is an AA, who starred at another school, who is supposed to be the second coming of Sue Bird, etc., etc. He might have some decent depth this year, which would be nice for a change, but who knows how kids will develop and mesh. And he's always used the bench pretty effectively to "motivate" players when they needed it. I would guess that there will be plenty of line-up changes during the first half of the season as he figures how to make the best of the talent he has. Frankly I could care less about who starts, or even who plays - Geno's mentality (and I'm sure I could be wrong) seems to be that ALL his players have to earn their playing time based on how they practice EVERY day, not what they did a year ago, could do, might do or want to do. Looking forward to seeing what he comes up with by the time the real season begins after Christmas.

You get--got it--good. Generally, Geno requires players to participate in practice with vigor. But not always. I know that comment will draw loads of those tell me that is wrong. So I'll hold my example(s) for the next comment coming.
But I agree that Geno uses positionless players, when he can. No one can say where and how KLS, Napheesa, Gabby Azura will be used by Geno with certainty. The educated guesses have been posted above and I agree with most. Certainly Geno will mix and match based on the team he is playing.
This discussions importance is in it's distraction from the lack of definitive information on the Uconn WBB team.
 
What does Stewie have to do with KLS? They play two different positions and their games are not similar in the least. Stewart is a stretch 4 that did a lot of her work in the post but still had the ability to step out and knock down a 3pt jump shot. KLS is 2/3 that spends 90% of her time on the perimeter and getting run off screens. That is a completely absurd correlation.
Very well said.
 
It is true that things have changed and, I doubt that she was told 'you will be a starter here regardless of the situation. That is the true fate of a transfer. I think she is up there with our best players. And I doubt that the Uconn staff will be willing to give Duke the last laugh, so much is at stake, including her development.
I have also watched a couple of the Fifa's U18 games. Whilst it's true that Crystal has taken on a leadership role and things go smoothly (or more so) when she is on the floor, I have not seen any new development in her defensive abilities. Indeed, on a few occasions she had trouble keeping the guarded player in front of her. That part of her game will have to improve if she wants a starting spot and, she may have competition. On another player- the recruit C. Williams. She seems very good at just about everything (and confidence); but, she shoots a lot.

Geno took a hobbled Duke Center who apparently Duke Medical could not or would not help. She was repaired by Uconn Medical Center, paid for by Uconn, and rehabed. She never fully recovered. Geno allowed her to practice when, how long when she was able. For more than 2 years Brittany Hunter gave Geno/Uconn every bit of talent and energy within her. The glimpse of greatness showed through. The point of this statement is to show the REAL Geno and what a Duke Transfer was willing to give back to him. To me this honors both. I have expectations that Azura shall see what Geno has done for her future career and her current Basketball abilities.
 
While more positive in my thoughts, defense will be the main factor in minutes this coming year. Team was loaded last year but could not stop quick point guards from driving the middle. Geno has a LONG memory.

Hop jim--I see things a bit differently.
1. Defense of the dribble drive has been a factor for much of the last 10 years
2.Teams with longer bench and good guards have created problems for Uconn
3.In practice and in games Defense lapses tend to create splinter illness
4.Geno's memory is long in some areas, short in others--as it suits HIM.
5.Geno as any Coach, will manipulate emotions ,playing time or anything to motivate\
6.The weakness of some of the Geno's more recent teams has been his created short bench.

Luckily Uconn has had the talent and mobile players to mask some defense/short bench--but we have seen times where another foul or 2 may have ended in a loss.
Also, we have seen teams--USC, Md, LV, Duke, ND--use freshmen early and often. I refuse to believe those teams get better more ready players than Uconn.
 
One problem with the proposed starting line up is that it is really slow. Saniya was the fastest player, and now we plug in her place the team's slowest player. The rest of last year's starters aren't all that fast either. Quick penetrating guards are going to be a problem. Crystal Dangerfield needs to become Mo, at least on defense, in the next 3 1/2 months.
 
.-.
CocoHusky- - -Azura would be replacing Saniya and the lineup would change positions, (even tho Geno really doesn't stick to real positions the're just titles) without benching an AA. The line up for the beginning of 2017-2018 IMHO would be:

Kia Nurse PG
KLS SG AA
Gabby Williams SF AA
Naphessa Collins PF AA
Azura Stevens PF/C

1st G off the bench will be: Crystal Dangerfield
1st Big off the bench will be: Batouly Camara

It might change later on during the season but this is the only lineup that makes sense, again IMHO!
I'm just an old turf writer out of his lane but I think your assessment is correct.
 
One problem with the proposed starting line up is that it is really slow. Saniya was the fastest player, and now we plug in her place the team's slowest player. The rest of last year's starters aren't all that fast either. Quick penetrating guards are going to be a problem. Crystal Dangerfield needs to become Mo, at least on defense, in the next 3 1/2 months.
I'm sorry but Gabby was a NV state champion in the high hurdles and Kia, Lou, Pheesa and I suspect Z also run the court like no other team in WBB.

It's not about who might win a 100 yd dash. It's about who's in the best shape and will still be sprinting up and down the court in the 4th quarter when the other team's tongues are hanging out.
 
Every once in a while you make sense. ;) Your syntax needs work and your cadence can be annoying, but, still, if a person can parse it, sometimes it makes sense.... Don't let it go to your head though Broadway.

As far as Syntax---others have larger syntax---I have always ---believed--that if Sin was actually
Taxed--it would gloat the treasury and then you'd see some very fancy toilet seats.
 
I'm sorry but Gabby was a NV state champion in the high hurdles and Kia, Lou, Pheesa and I suspect Z also run the court like no other team in WBB.

It's not about who might win a 100 yd dash. It's about who's in the best shape and will still be sprinting up and down the court in the 4th quarter when the other team's tongues are hanging out.

This har country mouse wishes he had writ that--EXCELLENT---
It AIN"t about much more than talent and physical training--geno style.
 
According to most of you she will not be a starting pg for uconn this year? You seem to think gabby or kls will be the pg, which they never played at uconn since day 1.

More like Kia Nurse handling the rock at PG unless her shot fails her. I was hoping for more out of Dangerfield's USA play. This team, actually any UCONN team, is all about team passing and rapid ball and player movement. Nurse is the better defensive player until Dangerfield shows otherwise. Dangerfield is the better passer but she loves to dribble, dribble, dribble and more dribble which destroys UCONN's ball and player movement. I'll wait for the jury to come in.
 
Again with kia nurse? There's 2 guards on the team, kia will be one and Dangerfield the other. What is so hard to understand? Gabby, kls, and Collier are NOT guards!!!!!

From UCONN roster
33 Katie Lou Samuelson 6-3 Guard/Forward SO/SO Huntington Beach, Calif.
23 Azurá Stevens 6-6 Forward/Guard JR/JR Raleigh, N.C.

So I guess Stevens will play the point. :D
 
.-.
Can't we trade one of the 6 or 7 future all-americans for a Rhodes scholar or something?

Expectations are so high that there are only 2 possible outcomes: expectations are met; expectations are unmet. With only 5 players on the court at a time, 1 basketball, and 40 minutes of playing time, there is no possibility of expectations being exceeded.... But it sure will be fun to try....

"Expectations are so high that there are only 2 possible outcomes"
I don't believe this. So I don't believe what follows. Seems I said this to a prof in a philosophy class. :oops:
 
Crystal is not the worst defensive player on the team. That said, I will not argue that she is not the worst of the first 6 players on the floor. I've seen her man go right by her on more than one occasion (but not all the time) last year. I gave her a pass last year because she was a freshman. Learning how to play good defense (playing the passing lanes and keeping your arms up) and learning how to keep your man in front of you, is part of making that "sophomore leap" that all freshmen are expected to make. We all know that NOTHING frustrates Geno more than seeing one of his players get beat off the dribble. Saniya Chong's inability to keep her man in front of her played a large part (the other being her I-band injury) of her logging so much pine duty her first three years.

I've also seen Lou get beat several times as did Napheesa, because of being out of position, and not having their feet in the correct position to guard their man. IMO, the two best defensive players for Geno is Kia and Gabby (with Kia being the best). They have the ability (and determination) to keep their man in front of them. Geno once said "when Gabby is guarding you, you're guarded". Any basketball purist knows that you play defense with your feet, not your hands. The good defensive players keep their feet moving while in a defensive stance (instead of standing flat-footed). Sometimes we learn best (and more quickly) from our peers than our instructors (coaches).

I would like to see Dangerfield become tutored by peers Gabby and Kia, during the remainder of the summer, and before or after practice once the season starts. One on one instruction on how to move your feet, how to anticipate a player's movement, and how to take something away from your man. Learn how to be "proactive" instead of reactive. Shoot it, pass it, or drive to the basket. Those are a player's options on offense.

A good defensive player will take one or more of those options away from you. Moriah Jefferson was great at this, so was Stewie. This was a skill they both learned AFTER they arrived at UConn, not before. Dangerfield at some point will learn it too. She'll have to .....if she wants to play. KML was not a defensive stalwart, but Geno could not afford to take her out of the lineup for long periods of time. That's where Kiah Stokes came in as a counter measure. One was great on offense, the other was great on defense. Geno became masterful at inserting them into the lineup at any given time.

Whether you make them pass it, go in the direction YOU want them to go in, or take a shot that's not the best shot they could take (or they're comfortable with, i.e., a bad shot). The best thing (as far as you're concerned) is for your man to pass the ball to another player. If you can do that, then, you've done your job. You kept your man from scoring.

You ALWAYS try and help your teammates if and when you can, because EVERYONE gets beat once in a while. If you can hold YOUR man scoreless for all or most of the game, that frustrates them, and puts more pressure to score on their teammates. Remember 3 years ago when Ohio State's (and the nation's) leading scorer Kelsey Mitchell was held to just 8 points when they played UConn? Great defense held her to those 8 points. That was one of the reasons UConn won that game by such a large margin, because no one else stepped up. The twin towers at South Carolina were both always held to well under their season average when they played UConn because of good tight defense played by Stewie and Tuck.

The last time UConn played Notre Dame for the NC, Brianna Turner (their leading scorer) was held scoreless in the first half by Stewie and Tuck. Crystal is quick enough to be a lock-down defender. She just has to learn and master the "technique"....like Jefferson did. I'm betting she will. :cool:
In "THE GREAT LOSS", no one could keep their man in front of them. That left poor Collier all alone on a defensive island under the basket with the big girl and the one that got away. Mostly, all she could do was foul. When I say "no one", I also mean Gabby and Kia also let there guy beat them. Collier can't do it all.
 
One problem with the proposed starting line up is that it is really slow. Saniya was the fastest player, and now we plug in her place the team's slowest player. The rest of last year's starters aren't all that fast either. Quick penetrating guards are going to be a problem. Crystal Dangerfield needs to become Mo, at least on defense, in the next 3 1/2 months.
From this distance, it would appear you are on to something.
Now that you identified the problem--I am now giving you Geno's job--fix it!!

Before you fix it---Danger shall NEVER be Moriah--NEVER!! Forget that comparision. Moriah was quick, fast, and did things with the BB that amazed. On defense she could and did leap and block taller players-shocking most of those defended. If you think Danger will become Moriah on D--won't happen.
So without the Moriah to do your defense--to speed up your starting 5--who do you put in your Starting line up--Proven talent--I'll give you 2 positions with guesses from the 7 people most consider bench and the 5 starters plus 1.
 
"Expectations are so high that there are only 2 possible outcomes"
I don't believe this. So I don't believe what follows. Seems I said this to a prof in a philosophy class. :oops:
Possible outcomes--you win -you lose OR you start or you don't OR you get to play or you sit

Expectations--is the subject of the 2 outcomes--expectations are met OR they are not--there is no third option for Expectations.
Bags27 class in logic begins in Sept---sign up the ride is fun.
 
In "THE GREAT LOSS", no one could keep their man in front of them. That left poor Collier all alone on a defensive island under the basket with the big girl and the one that got away. Mostly, all she could do was foul. When I say "no one", I also mean Gabby and Kia also let there guy beat them. Collier can't do it all.

You'll get no argument from me . 6'7" McCowan was just too big for any UConn player to effectively guard. When you give away 5-6 inches and 30-40 pounds to your man, you're at a gross disadvantage. All you can do is foul her/him. Collier and Gabby did the best they could.

Even Butler really couldn't do anything with her. It just was not Uconn's day. UConn played small ball all season, and almost got away with it. If I still had my turban, I'd tip it to Napheesa and Gabulous for their play during the season, often guarding players much taller than them.

This year, we've got our own tower in 6'6" Azura Stevens who is mature, skilled and has a no nonsense approach. She and the rest of her teammates are hungry to play. May the basketball Gods smile on the UConn women this season. No days off!!!
 
Possible outcomes--you win -you lose OR you start or you don't OR you get to play or you sit

Expectations--is the subject of the 2 outcomes--expectations are met OR they are not--there is no third option for Expectations.
Bags27 class in logic begins in Sept---sign up the ride is fun.

You flunk.
 
.-.
You'll get no argument from me . 6'7" McCowan was just too big for any UConn player to effectively guard. When you give away 5-6 inches and 30-40 pounds to your man, you're at a gross disadvantage. All you can do is foul her/him. Collier and Gabby did the best they could.

Even Butler really couldn't do anything with her. It just was not Uconn's day. UConn played small ball all season, and almost got away with it. If I still had my turban, I'd tip it to Napheesa and Gabulous for their play during the season, often guarding players much taller than them.

This year, we've got our own tower in 6'6" Azura Stevens who is mature, skilled and has a no nonsense approach. She and the rest of her teammates are hungry to play. May the basketball Gods smile on the UConn women this season. No days off!!!

In "THE GREAT LOSS", no one could keep their man in front of them. That left poor Collier all alone on a defensive island under the basket with the big girl and the one that got away. Mostly, all she could do was foul. When I say "no one", I also mean Gabby and Kia also let there guy beat them. Collier can't do it all.

While I agree that Stevens will be the 5th starter this year, it was UConn's poor play on the offensive end and not the defensive that cost them a W against MSU. McCowan played well but was far from dominating with 10pts and 8rbs. It was UConn's poor foul shooting, turnovers, and failure to get to 50/50 balls that allowed MSU to attempt 67 field goals compared to a mere 46 for the Huskies.
 
While I agree that Stevens will be the 5th starter this year, it was UConn's poor play on the offensive end and not the defensive that cost them a W against MSU. McCowan played well but was far from dominating with 10pts and 8rbs. It was UConn's poor foul shooting, turnovers, and failure to get to 50/50 balls that allowed MSU to attempt 67 field goals compared to a mere 46 for the Huskies.
While every argument of the cause of the loss to Miss St has some validity each point you state MAY have been a factor--they are suppositions, your beliefs (which can never wrong because it's what YOU believe).
Butler in the final game at 6-5 was less effective than 6'1 Precious and in my opinion was a liability because she wasn't good with Bigs or Smalls. At times her emotions took charge and she had no idea of what to do next--that happened all season--so why did Geno use her, he knew all this--who else could he use--rarely used Molly or Kyla? --Neither was allowed much bigtime game experience--and this was crunch time. Geno was --like a twisted fastner--his depth was non existent and his prime time players had fouls and were dogged tired--why did they miss fouls they normally made?? Emotions---got to make this--and exhaustion was setting in. I could speak of the lack of getting more shots for kLS --or the need to defend further up court--but that would be whistling in the wind--To me Uconn lost this game on ONE thing only--DEPTH, short bench, no one to count on past 6th player--it will be interesting to see if Geno does not fully develop beyond the 7th person this year. 8 players are easier to work with and with loads of game time--give the coach people he can count on in the Big dance. But 8 with10 available players --means all 8 must be healthy and productive when needed ,with Mss St--they weren't.
 
While I agree that Stevens will be the 5th starter this year, it was UConn's poor play on the offensive end and not the defensive that cost them a W against MSU. McCowan played well but was far from dominating with 10pts and 8rbs. It was UConn's poor foul shooting, turnovers, and failure to get to 50/50 balls that allowed MSU to attempt 67 field goals compared to a mere 46 for the Huskies.
DEFENSE wins championships, and UConn has won a number of championships when their offense was less than effective. In 2010 UConn's offense was terrible in the 1st half and only slightly better in the 2nd half, but they beat Stanford 53-47 on the strength of a fantastic effort on defense.

I get that UConn played less then their best on offense vs MS St, but if the Huskies had the size and depth to play UCONN defense, the 60 pts they scored in regulation would have been more than enough.
 
I get that UConn played less then their best on offense vs MS St, but if the Huskies had the size and depth to play UCONN defense, the 60 pts they scored in regulation would have been more than enough.

Mississippi State shot 37% in that game. UConn got beat badly on second chance points, created almost no turnovers, and let the Bullsdogs control the pace and style of game.
 
There may be a bunch of sane reasons why UCONN lost in the Semi's to MissSt. But just possibly the reason they lost was they had given so much both physically & mentally all season that it took it's toll in that game!
UCONN just had nothing else to give!
As shocking and as simple as that sounds, all the players on the roster gave 150% for 36 games and in game 37 they were just worn out from going to the well to often! MissSt. just played at a higher level because they came in on a high and UCONN came in on a low!
 
.-.
Mississippi State shot 37% in that game. UConn got beat badly on second chance points, created almost no turnovers, and let the Bullsdogs control the pace and style of game.
I agree. Other than the 37% shooting, it was certainly not UCONN DEFENSE. I expect that throughout this season Geno is going to be an absolute pain in the ass about playing tough, smothering defense all over the floor.
 
I agree. Other than the 37% shooting, it was certainly not UCONN DEFENSE. I expect that throughout this season Geno is going to be an absolute pain in the ass about playing tough, smothering defense all over the floor.

Uconn kids, and certainly this is a superior group of Uconn kids, don't just give up and say "I'm not playing Uconn D". So--OLDUDE--what was the reason for this "apparent" let down in Defense??

I'm a broken record on my tune of Depth. I can twist that and paint it 8 different colors and it comes
out --the same. What I cannot deny is Schaefer had a good game plan well executed and played 9 of 10 players for more than a few minutes. Shaefer had the DEPTH of personnel , apparently with experience in many games, that gave him good minutes.
 
This discussions importance is in it's distraction from the lack of definitive information on the Uconn WBB team.

I promised myself not to post till the season started, just cuz I'm not much of a fan of the endless speculations (which started well before last season ended) and I was afraid I'd show what a cranky old SOB I can be in a reply. Oops. Back to my self-imposed ban from typing - will only just read for whatever actual news shows up!
 
There may be a bunch of sane reasons why UCONN lost in the Semi's to MissSt. But just possibly the reason they lost was they had given so much both physically & mentally all season that it took it's toll in that game!
UCONN just had nothing else to give!
As shocking and as simple as that sounds, all the players on the roster gave 150% for 36 games and in game 37 they were just worn out from going to the well to often! MissSt. just played at a higher level because they came in on a high and UCONN came in on a low!
In other words they did NOT exhibit the heart of a champion. When that happens you shake things up. I look look forward to see the shaken up Huskies!
 
I promised myself not to post till the season started, just cuz I'm not much of a fan of the endless speculations (which started well before last season ended) and I was afraid I'd show what a cranky old SOB I can be in a reply. Oops. Back to my self-imposed ban from typing - will only just read for whatever actual news shows up!

You don't know Cranky (to miss quote a famous movie line) you can't handle CRANKY.
Being an SOB has held only a few back from posting---post away!!
 
I promised myself not to post till the season started, just cuz I'm not much of a fan of the endless speculations (which started well before last season ended) and I was afraid I'd show what a cranky old SOB I can be in a reply. Oops. Back to my self-imposed ban from typing - will only just read for whatever actual news shows up!

Hey augustaTC, don't be selfish. A lot of us are cranky SOB's too (some more than others). We welcome comments and opinions from everyone, especially cranky old SOB's. We get some of our best posts from old cranks.
So feel right at home. If you read something that hits a nerve, let us know about it, we need the fodder. It is hoped you would give us a pass on the endless speculations. During the slow summer months, there's not much else to comment about. We go through this EVERY summer. Unless we get a new commit or lose a player to transfer (Natalie Butler), and there's little to no news is coming out of the basketball office, we're reduced to playing a lot of solitaire. :)
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,366
Messages
4,568,329
Members
10,472
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom