Goodrich Starting Ahead of Diggins | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Goodrich Starting Ahead of Diggins

Status
Not open for further replies.
And if a Lady Vols fan said the same about DT, exactly how would you differentiate?
Two things:
First, DT is one of the best players ever in the WNBA, so a Lady Vols fan wouldn't be able to comment on her poor performance. She has not been the huge disappointment that SD is thus far.
Second, if DT had underperformed, I would be pissed about a Lady Vol fan making a comment like that. So what? I like DT as a great player on my team with moxie and the talent to back it up. Other teams disliked her for the very same reasons. There are some teams and some players that many UConn fans aren't all that fond of. The same goes for every team in every sport. To make believe that we're above all that and sending the love out to every player all the time is disingenuous and ludicrous.
 
It's going to be another scrappy day in paradise....
 
Don't care one way or the other about Diggins. Hence, why no comments from me so far. However I did find this......interesting???


Enjoy

1. Why did they feel the need to close caption the people you could understand and not the one you couldn't?
2. I imagine when Diggins was told of this fan driving 600+ miles to see all her home games and wearing green because she played at ND, the first thought through her head was "I gotta beef up my security."
 
What do those have to do with Boneyard fans. Nothing. In reality it isn't even clear they are fans of Montgomery at all. They are draft articles by the NY Times, Seattle Times and WNBA.com.
You know, Ice, that poster has a history of coming on the board and having insane or ridiculous opinions and calls out BY'ers in the process, then does a fast shuffle in subject matter to change what was actually "meant", then starts in on something else. One of the least enjoyable visitors to our board - always picking quarrels with anyone and everyone... Frankly, I'm surprised the poster hasn't been banned.

Case in point for this discussion - it was about Diggins, but suddenly it's about BY fans who supposedly thought that Monty should have been the #1 draft pick (which has zero to do with the topic at hand - mainly the hype by ESPN and the WNBA surrounding Diggins). But as proof, a bunch of draft.net articles about Monty apparently projected to go at the top of the draft. Which as you aptly pointed out, has zero to do with BY fans, and even less to do with Digggins' hype... altho i'm not sure what is less than zero...!!
 
Yep. The stats will show the biggest reason ND beat (not dominated, dominated means you stomp the other team by 18+)) UConn.

UConn 1 - 4-15, 2-4(3pt), 5 assist, 7 turnover
UConn 2 - 11-31, 0-5(3pt), 3 assist, 8 turnover
UConn 3 - 5-15, 0-2(3pt), 6 assist, 5 turnover
UConn 4 - 3-15, 0-3(3pt), 8 assist, 6 turnover
Diggins was the one that "stirred the drink"- she would come up with those sneaky steals or front our player who was getting the pass and get the charge call. She broke down our defense off the dribble a lot- and then Notre Dame's great interior passing lead to easy buckets or kick outs for uncontested three's. I personally don't like her. And I don't think she is a super star. But it is not fair to say that she was not a Key cog in the wheel. I also think this year we developed late obviously. We did hand over the earlier three losses-each we were in excellent position to win.
And N Dame was a much better team her Soph and Jr year IMO! She was a really good distributor and facilitator. In the Semi's this year- the body language by SD and Achonwa was so bad even early in the game. It almost looked like they knew they could not win the game. Even when it was close they looked frustrated to death. Anyhoo!
 
I know you are not this dumb, so what is your agenda? To trash Montgomery in order to inflate Diggins.

On a Uconn board.

Trolling.

The big picture agenda seems to be criticizing former UConn players. Montgomery is a favorite target, sometimes not even mentioned by name and sometimes apropos of nothing (see last post in this very short thread http://www.the-boneyard.com/threads/sun-up-74-61-on-washington-3-31-left-in-game.20715/#post-279800 which is about Renee though she is not mentioned in the post nor had she been mentioned in the thread.) Asjha was/is also a target, particularly after her selection to the Olympic Team, though strangely no mention of her after she filled her role as 12th player beautifully in Team USA's toughest against Australia).

There are many here who are willing to engage in honest discussion of current and former UConn players, their strengths, weaknesses, successes and struggles. It's very difficult to have that conversation with posters whose primary agenda seems to be to criticize UConn players. That's not engaging in discussion; that's using this board as a dumping ground and it's a turnoff.
 
.-.
I bet he was hoping she'd be drafted by Chicago instead of Tulsa
I am in "Shock" - no pun intended, that she has never met, spoken, or taken a picture with this gentleman. He loses his son. Comes out of a deep depression as a result of watching her play the game of basketball. Gets season tickets and drives 600 miles per home game to see her. I would be dumbfounded if most of the young women that come thru Ct, wouldn't go over pre or post game and shake his hand, wish him well, and ask if he would like some pictures taken with him. This tells me more about who and what I think she is than anything. Am I crazy? Would a small gesture like I mention above be too much for one of these athletes after you are made aware of the entire background re this nice man?
 
You know, Ice, that poster has a history of coming on the board and having insane or ridiculous opinions and calls out BY'ers in the process, then does a fast shuffle in subject matter to change what was actually "meant", then starts in on something else. One of the least enjoyable visitors to our board - always picking quarrels with anyone and everyone... Frankly, I'm surprised the poster hasn't been banned.

Case in point for this discussion - it was about Diggins, but suddenly it's about BY fans who supposedly thought that Monty should have been the #1 draft pick (which has zero to do with the topic at hand - mainly the hype by ESPN and the WNBA surrounding Diggins). But as proof, a bunch of draft.net articles about Monty apparently projected to go at the top of the draft. Which as you aptly pointed out, has zero to do with BY fans, and even less to do with Digggins' hype... altho i'm not sure what is less than zero...!!

-1 to -infiniity
 
LOL.

I have not mentioned Goodrich's name a single time in this thread. I have said that I expected Diggins to struggle, that the WNBA is different than it was 11 years ago (which is undeniably true), and that it was too early to judge Diggins so harshly.

I must apologize for piggybacking on doggydaddy putting words in your mouth. Ironically, as I was willing to charitably acknowledge one of your assertions as actually relating to the attended purpose of the thread, you've just denied that. Therefore I must also acknowledge that you may not be guilty of post hoc reasoning; you are simply a provocateur, i.e., a troll.
 
Digger, I've never seen a poster rub you wrong like this guy.
 
I must apologize for piggybacking on doggydaddy putting words in your mouth. Ironically, as I was willing to charitably acknowledge one of your assertions as actually relating to the attended purpose of the thread, you've just denied that. Therefore I must also acknowledge that you may not be guilty of post hoc reasoning; you are simply a provocateur, i.e., a troll.
Sorry Digger. My bad.
 
Digger, I've never seen a poster rub you wrong like this guy.

I can think of one, bball****, the Conlon critic. Then again, he rubbed everyone the wrong way. I also had my moments with knowitall/Dutchess***/huskyrob. Indeed, all of my sabbaticals from this board have come when I found myself "crossing the line;" addressing people differently than I feel I would in person.

In this case, you know how much I hate the hypothetical/post hoc/tautological reasoning of think tanks with their fixed agendas. This poster's handle perhaps inclined me to equate him with that. Now that we've established he's simply a troll I'll be able to better resist in the future. I won't take a sabbatical just yet. This is, after all, still the most informative and hospitable fan board in cyberspace.

Ooh, ooh, I forgot to add ... Thanks to our wonderful moderators.
 
.-.
"The truth below" should be renamed "the Troll below"....:p

yeah, I know that wasn't nice. I'll stop now
 
I am in "Shock" - no pun intended, that she has never met, spoken, or taken a picture with this gentleman. He loses his son. Comes out of a deep depression as a result of watching her play the game of basketball. Gets season tickets and drives 600 miles per home game to see her. I would be dumbfounded if most of the young women that come thru Ct, wouldn't go over pre or post game and shake his hand, wish him well, and ask if he would like some pictures taken with him. This tells me more about who and what I think she is than anything. Am I crazy? Would a small gesture like I mention above be too much for one of these athletes after you are made aware of the entire background re this nice man?


wow - harsh.....she is aware of him, is humbled (her words) by him, and does wave to him each game according to the clip. Did you watch it?

I am not a fan of Skyler, but clearly her work ethic and energy serves the greater good for some folks who need something positive in their lives. He has courtside seats and appears happy with his situation.

Sheesh
 
I can think of one, bball* , the Conlon critic. Then again, he rubbed everyone the wrong way. I also had my moments with knowitall/Dutchess* /huskyrob. Indeed, all of my sabbaticals from this board have come when I found myself "crossing the line;" addressing people differently than I feel I would in person.

In this case, you know how much I hate the hypothetical/post hoc/tautological reasoning of think tanks with their fixed agendas. This poster's handle perhaps inclined me to equate him with that. Now that we've established he's simply a troll I'll be able to better resist in the future. I won't take a sabbatical just yet. This is, after all, still the most informative and hospitable fan board in cyberspace.

Ooh, ooh, I forgot to add ... Thanks to our wonderful moderators.

This isn't my "fight" at all, but, I really liked a couple of the things you said here. Like you, I'm generally a patient & playful poster - the Silly Old Bear - but, like you, now and then I run across something that I feel I must curl my lip and snap at. That's somewhat the nature of these boards - and, we've all seen posts either a) complaining that the BY is too much a cheerleading forum, or b) complaining that the BY is a fetid well of negativity. Sometimes, even in the same thread!

This leads me to believe that our Mods strike a pretty good balance between being supportive, but, in an analytical and thoughtful way, rather than blind allegiance (Tony C excepted, of course). There will always be differences of opinion, and differences in the quality of the underpinnings of these opinions, but most of the time we get through it without drawing too much blood. Credit also needs to be given to the individual posters who try to select their words carefully, anticipating potential misinterpretation or the inadvertent goring of somebody's pet cow. But, in the words of Old Lodge Skins, "sometimes the magic works..and, sometimes it doesn't".

The point I really want to thank you for is stating "This is, after all, still the most informative and hospitable fan board in cyberspace".

This is a fun place to be. Knowledgeable, playful, wistful, teasing, analytical, poignant, supportive, argumentative, sarcastic, sly, a tad , informative on matters somewhat OT - the BY is simply a very worthwhile investment in one's time and interest.

That sounds like a sale pitch for Lurker Day, but, that's not my intent. I simply want to express my appreciation to the BY, and to "most of you guys, most of the time":rolleyes:
 
I know it's kind of feeding trollish diversionary tactics, but just to put Monty's career in perspective, she was in reality selected 4th in the 2009 draft and statistically looking at the top 10 picks in the WNBA that year with Angel being by far the best, RM would by most fans be rated even in the 3-4 slots with #3 pick Tolliver but with #5 pick Bonner being in 2nd place off of her PPG and RPG numbers, though this opinion would not include any evaluation of defensive strength or other less statistically tangible figures. #2 pick Coleman is well back now from the top group and Courtney Paris is not really a court shaker at even a #7 pick level.

Monty has done pretty much what you would expect a #4 pick to do in a average to less-than-average draft year, and that is very nice unless one has old newspaper headlines pasted all over them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,477
Messages
4,577,114
Members
10,488
Latest member
husky62


Top Bottom