Geno's Technical? | The Boneyard

Geno's Technical?

Papa33

Papa33

Poster Emeritus
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
569
Reaction Score
3,345
I've been looking for any printed explanation for our favorite coach's bench technical. I guess he was well out on the court, but what was he objecting to? For my part, I wondered at Cal's oft-employed defensive tactic of bodying up on any UConn players driving to the hoop. I saw lots of contact that banged drivers off course or off balance just prior to shots. No calls on any of them that I can recall.
 
Sargassoc said:
Boneyard chat reported a perceived no-call on Megan. I didn't see it either.
Expand ...

It was a poor lack of judgment by Geno and could have costed us the game

I hope in hindsight when watching that he realizes how stupid it was. He certainly doesn’t appear to listen to cd on the bench
 
I'm soooo tired of her holding him back... it looks foolish, he doesn't have self-control?
 
NEforceUConn said:
It was a poor lack of judgment by Geno and could have costed us the game

I hope in hindsight when watching that he realizes how stupid it was. He certainly doesn’t appear to listen to cd on the bench
Expand ...
That's a little harsh, isn't it? The game was never really in play, technical from Geno or not.

From what I've seen, the Huskies often seem subject to some "benevolent" referee trying to use the whistle to even up the game a little. In the face of this, sometimes a coach has to stand up for his team. To me, Geno usually strikes the right balance in this regard.
 
Love how soooooooo many people here know how to coach better than Geno does.
Personally I think this was the most inconsistent trio of refs we have had in a long time and Geno finally had enough. We were probably on the way to a 20+ plus lead and the refs just seemed oblivious to what was going on, for both sides, but seemed to be more lopsided towards the home team at times.
Wish I could watch the replay and count the ref miscues.
 
.-.
The officiating in that game yesterday was absolutely horrendous! Anigwe and West would camp out in the lane for 5-6 seconds virtually every possession with zero 3 second calls, West would set a blatant moving screen at the foul line virtually every possession, virtually every 50/50 call on a ball that went out of bounds was given to Cal, UConn's cutters were grabbed and bumped virtually every possession, and Anigwe got away with at least 3 no call fouls when she was on defense.

I have no problem with Coach Auriemma getting a technical. I just have a problem with him getting one in a crucial spot in the game like yesterday.
 
RockyMTblue2 said:
It was reported in another game a few days ago that there is now a rule that if a coach has to be restrained by an assistant it is an automatic T. Don't know if that was accurate or not.
Expand ...


Not accurate. It is possible that a referee might decide that this action falls into one of the various supposed conduct violations, cited in the rules, most of which are not deemed to be technical fouls:

c. Prolonged, negative responses to a call/no-call that are disrespectful or unprofessional and include, but are not limited to, thrashing the arms in disgust, dramatizing contact by re-enacting the play, or running or jumping in disbelief over a call/no-call.
d. A negative response to a call/no-call including, but not limited to, approaching/charging an official in a hostile, aggressive or otherwise threatening manner, emphatically removing one's coat in response to a call/no-call or throwing equipment or clothing on to the floor.
e. Continual criticism during a game regarding the same incident after receiving a warning from an official.
f. Taunting, baiting, ridiculing, finger pointing, trash talking or inappropriate gestures (obscene, provoking and intimidating).
 
I was right behind the Uconn bench. Geno complained earlier, I think about Collier being knocked down. It might have been the first half, don't recall, but it was at the far end. When Megan went down in the paint, in front of the Uconn bench, he stepped on the court and yelled at one of the women refs. She T-d him up. I don't think Megan going down was much, as others around me said too. I am pretty sure the T made it UCONN 3 fouls Cal 0. In fact I think all of Cals fouls in the 4 the quarter were intentional fouls and all in the last 2minute. He was protecting his players. I think the lead was either 12 or 10 points. Would he do it in a closer game, probably not.
 
As I recall it was a 10 point game and the T foul shots brought it down to 8 with 1:57 left. Not a smart move by any stretch of the imagination.
 
NEforceUConn said:
It was a poor lack of judgment by Geno and could have costed us the game

I hope in hindsight when watching that he realizes how stupid it was. He certainly doesn’t appear to listen to cd on the bench
Expand ...
If it was merely for a no-call on Megan, then I think it might have been poor judgment for a different reason. IMO UConn was benefitting more than Cal from the refs not calling a close game. We can’t afford foul trouble, and we held Anigwe to 10 points with Collier - the primary defender on Anigwe -getting ZERO fouls. Why call more attention to it?
 
.-.
Papa33 said:
I've been looking for any printed explanation for our favorite coach's bench technical. I guess he was well out on the court, but what was he objecting to? For my part, I wondered at Cal's oft-employed defensive tactic of bodying up on any UConn players driving to the hoop. I saw lots of contact that banged drivers off course or off balance just prior to shots. No calls on any of them that I can recall.
Expand ...
What you are seeing is the 2018/19 version, of this is how to beat Uconn . bang them and then get them in foul trouble--no bench help.
 
Papa33 said:
I've been looking for any printed explanation for our favorite coach's bench technical. I guess he was well out on the court, but what was he objecting to? For my part, I wondered at Cal's oft-employed defensive tactic of bodying up on any UConn players driving to the hoop. I saw lots of contact that banged drivers off course or off balance just prior to shots. No calls on any of them that I can recall.
Expand ...

Megan went into the lane and got hit by 2 players and ended up on the floor. It was a pretty obvious hard foul from where I was sitting. No call by the ref and Geno went ballistic. I think at that point he'd already decided to get the T. Cal hit a three at the other end and Geno stepped out onto the court as the play came back down to his end, got in the face of the ref and got the T.

The refs were letting a lot of stuff go in the paint and I think Geno was worried that it was out-of-hand and someone was going to get hurt.
 
NEforceUConn said:
It was a poor lack of judgment by Geno and could have costed us the game

I hope in hindsight when watching that he realizes how stupid it was. He certainly doesn’t appear to listen to cd on the bench
Expand ...

Since it didn't cost Uconn the game, it was not bad. As they say : The proof is in the pudding. In earlier day Geno was thrown OUT of games; not that's a bad one.
If fans are expecting perfection in anything Geno does or YOU do, think again: It won't happen in this life time. His judgement in this case seems to have been validated.
 
Geno will defend his kids regardless of what it will cost. It is important for the TEAM to know he always has their back. Then too a Tech against Geno usually gives the team a spark to step up the offense or Defesne.
 
.-.
From an independent Cal sports website:

West then blocked Walker inside, and Caldwell grabbed the rebound and the Bears sped up the court. Caldwell found Thomas, who hit a three and Cal was within 72-62 with just under two minutes to play. The crowd erupted, and in the midst of the bedlam, Auriemma was assessed a technical foul for arguing fouls called against his team.​
​
“We have the reputation around the country, year in and year out--we just don’t foul,” said Auriemma. “And by the end of the game, Cal had shot more free-throws than us and still had four fouls to give. I was OK with it, until I wasn’t.”​
​
 
j66kicker said:
If it was merely for a no-call on Megan, then I think it might have been poor judgment for a different reason. IMO UConn was benefitting more than Cal from the refs not calling a close game. We can’t afford foul trouble, and we held Anigwe to 10 points with Collier - the primary defender on Anigwe -getting ZERO fouls. Why call more attention to it?
Expand ...

What? They were not calling a "close game", they were calling a one sided game! Collier held Anigwe to 10 points because she got help just about every possession. UConn is known as a team that doesn't foul and to have there be that big of a discrepancy in fouls called is ridiculous.
 
NEforceUConn said:
As I recall it was a 10 point game and the T foul shots brought it down to 8 with 1:57 left. Not a smart move by any stretch of the imagination.
Expand ...
Really??? And where do you coach? Oh thats right... you are not the coach who has 11 national titles, you are not the coach who makes millions of dollars a year... you have not been the coach of the year... etc....
 
NEforceUConn said:
It was a poor lack of judgment by Geno and could have costed us the game

I hope in hindsight when watching that he realizes how stupid it was. He certainly doesn’t appear to listen to cd on the bench
Expand ...

Oh please!!!!!!! Give it up. Geno protects his players when he sees them getting hammered.
 
.-.
Plebe said:
From an independent Cal sports website:

West then blocked Walker inside, and Caldwell grabbed the rebound and the Bears sped up the court. Caldwell found Thomas, who hit a three and Cal was within 72-62 with just under two minutes to play. The crowd erupted, and in the midst of the bedlam, Auriemma was assessed a technical foul for arguing fouls called against his team.​
​
“We have the reputation around the country, year in and year out--we just don’t foul,” said Auriemma. “And by the end of the game, Cal had shot more free-throws than us and still had four fouls to give. I was OK with it, until I wasn’t.”​
​
Expand ...

Sorry, Geno. Cal was called for 13 fouls, UConn 8. And UConn was 8-8, while Cal was 4-5.
 
Some of Coach critics remind me of a football game ,in which we were leading 50 to 0 and I was playing my bench ,one of my know more than me fans "Hollered Out "if you take off that Cowboy hat ,Maybe you could do some Coaching. In other words; there will always be some fans that know more than the Winning Coach. Why are there so many UConn. fans always dwelling on the negative?
 
TitleTown said:
What? They were not calling a "close game", they were calling a one sided game! Collier held Anigwe to 10 points because she got help just about every possession. UConn is known as a team that doesn't foul and to have there be that big of a discrepancy in fouls called is ridiculous.
Expand ...
You're thinking of the 4th quarter, where Cal had no team fouls toward the end. But things even out, or more than even out. Over the whole game these evil refs called 9 fouls on UConn and 13 on Cal. So...

1) It was not a very closely-called game (which, IMO, favored UConn), and...

2) If it was 1-sided, then I guess the refs favored UConn, since they called fewer fouls on us. Plus, re. shooting fouls, Cal only shot 5 FTs, while we shot 8.

These are the facts, and the facts are undisputed...
1545624487922.png
 
TitleTown said:
The officiating in that game yesterday was absolutely horrendous! Anigwe and West would camp out in the lane for 5-6 seconds virtually every possession with zero 3 second calls, West would set a blatant moving screen at the foul line virtually every possession, virtually every 50/50 call on a ball that went out of bounds was given to Cal, UConn's cutters were grabbed and bumped virtually every possession, and Anigwe got away with at least 3 no call fouls when she was on defense.

I have no problem with Coach Auriemma getting a technical. I just have a problem with him getting one in a crucial spot in the game like yesterday.
Expand ...
I agree that it was ill-timed. I think we are in agreement that Geno was trying to protect his player(s). To the extent that he is doing that (especially with regards to Lou), I am fully supportive.
 
j66kicker said:
You're thinking of the 4th quarter, where Cal had no team fouls toward the end. But things even out, or more than even out. Over the whole game these evil refs called 9 fouls on UConn and 13 on Cal. So...

1) It was not a very closely-called game (which, IMO, favored UConn), and...

2) If it was 1-sided, then I guess the refs favored UConn, since they called fewer fouls on us. Plus, re. shooting fouls, Cal only shot 5 FTs, while we shot 8.

These are the facts, and the facts are undisputed...
View attachment 37672
Expand ...

No, the facts are that Cal fouled on virtually every single trip down the floor and had very few fouls called against them. UConn fouled very few times down the floor and had virtually every foul they committed called against them.

Cal also had more fouls called against them because they were intentionally fouling trying to stop the clock and send UConn to the line late in the game.
 
TitleTown said:
The officiating in that game yesterday was absolutely horrendous! Anigwe and West would camp out in the lane for 5-6 seconds virtually every possession with zero 3 second calls, West would set a blatant moving screen at the foul line virtually every possession, virtually every 50/50 call on a ball that went out of bounds was given to Cal, UConn's cutters were grabbed and bumped virtually every possession, and Anigwe got away with at least 3 no call fouls when she was on defense.

I have no problem with Coach Auriemma getting a technical. I just have a problem with him getting one in a crucial spot in the game like yesterday.
Expand ...

Finally got to view the game. I thought you were using hyberbole. Nay Nay - you're dead on.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,510
Messages
4,579,587
Members
10,489
Latest member
Djw06001


Top Bottom