Geno v Cori | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Geno v Cori

Here’s an element of coaching to consider. Close has developed an offense that practically forces the basketball into to low post, which is about all that UCLA did well last night.

Remember that Geno recruited Betts. Had she come to Storrs, UConn would never have put her in a similar offense. Geno runs a motion offense that spreads the floor and shares the ball.

That is not to suggest that Geno would never post up Betts and feed her the ball in the low post. It would be an option. But not an exclusive one.

What Geno knows, and Close has yet to understand, is that a one dimensional offense is much easier to stop than a multidimensional offense.
 
Though I know I have seen way less WBB games that other BYers here, I was simply amazed how poorly UCLA shot 3-pointers. It's one thing to shoot a 3-pointer under pressure. It's another thing to shoot a 3-pointer when you are wide open.

Betts obviously doesn't worry about shooting 3-pointers. In 3 seasons, she has never attempted a single 3-pointer. Heck, in practice, while her teammates are shooting 3-pointers, she should be practicing her foul shot shooting since it's at 62% --- some 20 points worse than most of her teammates. If her sister is anything like her, Lauren will have someone to practice foul shot shooting with next season; unless she spends this practice time working on her hook shot spin moves or in the training room getting a massage.
 
The pacing is just one of my personal problems (lol). Hope my wife doesn’t read this. There are different levels to it, but in any case it can unsettle players. Close’s pacing seems to be nerves, whereas Mulkey’s pacing is just what drama queens do and what hypes up other drama queens. lol. At least Close restricts her performance to the coach’s box unlike Mulkey who thinks the court is her personal runway.

 
Last edited:
UConn's speed is usually the first thing that coaches cite.
This is an excellent observation, and counter-intuitive because UConn doesn't always have the super-speedy types like Hidalgo. We have one this year in KK, but the speed at issue is team speed. The team moves as a whole with astonishing rapidity, already in a play or a defensive formation before the opponent knows what happened. They turn a defensive stop around so quickly it makes opponents' heads spin. It's not about one speedster beating them down the floor. The whole team gets out on the break. Sarah, who is not the speediest, is usually first or second in the transition offense. And they do this when opponents score as much as when they miss. And on a long rebound: fuhgedaboutit.
 
Several posters have commented that Geno completely out coached Cori Close. Just watched their presser. The UCLA players said they felt fully prepared by their coaching staff and owned that they did not execute and played poorly. I am curious what other boneyarders would point to—specifically—to critique Close. Where do you see the superior coaching?
Soxx- - -There was nothing Close could have down to stop that snowball rolling downhill!
 
Several posters have commented that Geno completely out coached Cori Close. Just watched their presser. The UCLA players said they felt fully prepared by their coaching staff and owned that they did not execute and played poorly. I am curious what other boneyarders would point to—specifically—to critique Close. Where do you see the superior coaching?
game planning just to start. Others can fill in what they want, but the first step in putting together a game plan was obviously superior from coach Gramps.
 
If any of you saw A. Carter in her postgame interview with SVP she said she is a player analyst normally, but in this case had to give the main credit for the blowout to Geno and his gameplan.
 
Close’s post game presser was impressive, IMO. She prepared the best she could given lack of experience in the FF. She said she talked with many others about what to expect, and they all said—you have to experience it. She took responsibility to take this experience and learn from it. She was VERY complimentary of UConn.

She values learning from experience. I think she’d be a good coach to play for.

It appears the coaches and the program have been so supportive of Betts with her mental health struggles, and I can’t dog anyone who steps up to that plate. It’s sorely needed.
 
Talent-wise, UCLA compares favorably to UConn and every other team in the country. No way, this team should lose to any team by 30 plus points.
I think for Close, her team has the problem that Geno always talks about as a priority. Consistency and can she trust her players beyond Betts to get X every night. She can't.

I've watched them all season and it has always been different players helping Betts to put points up and not a consistent player or two.
These both are interesting points. Talent and player rankings are one thing, but development is another. Geno speaks often about players these days, not knowing how to do basic hoop skills. Geno demands consistency, and yes, we all moan about how he pulls players after mistakes, however this is what makes players and teams great.
 
the outcoached thing seems a real reach Uconn
is playing very well right now and has way better talent at the top
ucla was a one dimension team based on lauren betts that had allowed them to be very successful
despite her statistics she was a non factor last night
imho Jana el efy in the first 5 minutes of the game limited Betts impact by
playing straight up defense with no help that
was not something that had happened to
ucla all year
the panic set in and lesser talent at the other 4 positions
led to the easy win
was it poor coaching that allowed Jana to play
way beyond what she had shown all year?
ucla plays one way and when that wasn’t working
their was no plan b
only opinion i have on her as a coach is that
i question the usefulness of the very emotional
in game style
 
Here’s an element of coaching to consider. Close has developed an offense that practically forces the basketball into to low post, which is about all that UCLA did well last night.

Remember that Geno recruited Betts. Had she come to Storrs, UConn would never have put her in a similar offense. Geno runs a motion offense that spreads the floor and shares the ball.

That is not to suggest that Geno would never post up Betts and feed her the ball in the low post. It would be an option. But not an exclusive one.

What Geno knows, and Close has yet to understand, is that a one dimensional offense is much easier to stop than a multidimensional offense.
Geno runs the offense that suits the players that he has. When he had less mobile post players like Kara Wolters and Stephanie Dolson, the offense included getting the ball to them in the low post.
 
This is an excellent observation, and counter-intuitive because UConn doesn't always have the super-speedy types like Hidalgo. We have one this year in KK, but the speed at issue is team speed. The team moves as a whole with astonishing rapidity, already in a play or a defensive formation before the opponent knows what happened. They turn a defensive stop around so quickly it makes opponents' heads spin. It's not about one speedster beating them down the floor. The whole team gets out on the break. Sarah, who is not the speediest, is usually first or second in the transition offense. And they do this when opponents score as much as when they miss. And on a long rebound: fuhgedaboutit.
Be quick, but don't hurry. John Wooden
 
Close was def out coached. And there was zero adjustment at halftime
Really? How many points did Azzi get in the second half after racking up 19 in the first half? Now that is not to say those were good adjustments because I saw a few plays where multiple UCLA players went to guard Azzi leaving Sarah wide open to shoot a 3.
 
Geno runs the offense that suits the players that he has. When he had less mobile post players like Kara Wolters and Stephanie Dolson, the offense included getting the ball to them in the low post.
The evolution of UConn's offense has taken place over many years. Kara played at a time when the only team in the country using a motion offense was Pet Carrill's Princeton Tigers. As for Steph, she did not exclusively play in the low post on offense. Geno ran a lot of his offense through Steph in the high post, running screen and rolls, backdoor cuts and so on. Furthermore, UConn's best two low post scorers have been Tuck & Pheesa, both of whom played when UConn was fully committed to spreading the floor and running a motion offense.
 
[Sarcasm Alert: post incoming]

This is what always happens. Azzi goes off for 19 or 20 points in the first half and then opposing teams double and triple team her even if it means Paige and Sarah go off in the second half. I think the opposing coaches must think this will undermine Azzi's confidence
 
There was one adjustment- Azzi was double teamed in the second half, unlike the first. Unfortunately for UCLA, that meant there was only one defender on Paige
or Sarah
 
what adjustments do you think she should have made?
NOT Double Team AZZI when she has a history of hot and cold streaks, 'forgetting' that Paige did just score 29 second-half points against OK and Sarah can score effectively from the outside.
 
The experience factor of at final four is huge - it is a media circus unlike anything women's basketball players have gone through in their basketball lives before they get to one. The distractions, the media presence, the schedules all combine to throw off standard routines for teams and players. Geno has talked about how badly Uconn handled their first one, and how her has known when his team 'wasn't ready' in other years. But Uconn has the institutional memory and the players have the experience - if you play at Uconn there is the regular season championship, then the tournament championship, and then the final four and sometimes you win the semi and sometimes you don't, but the season ends with the final four each year. And the rookies learn from the sophomores, who were there last year, the juniors who have been their twice, and the seniors with their three trips, and they shepherd the transfers and rookies through the process.

As for the coaching ... Geno had a plan, but it depended on UCLA missing from outside, and Uconn minimizing the driving and entry passes. And on Uconn playing multiple defenses - double and triple team the post sometimes and play it straight up on the next possession, running zone and switching back to man, but always pressuring the outside. UCLA got tighter and tighter on offense, and were run ragged on defense, the pace became another form of 'pressure' making UCLA run and seldom letting them set their half court defense. AND rebound!

Geno also has the process and flow of building a final four team down pat - he knows how to build up to this stage of a season. He is the best to ever do it, just as he is the best at coaching undefeated seasons, how to keep the pressure on, but provide moments of relief, and to create controlled celebration while maintaining focus on the next game.

Close did make halftime adjustments, and Azzi was shut down - 19 points in the first half, zero in the second, but Paige went off for 10 and Sarah for 14 in the second half compensation for that 'zero'. Paige and Sarah were getting the same shots Azzi had in the first half. And Sarah was as much of a match up issue for UCLA as Betts was for Uconn. And sometimes (especially playing Uconn) games can completely snowball. Hope people noticed how the bench actually increased the lead which almost never happens!

Great season for Close, and great experience, and if they keep focused they will be back to the FF next year, and much better prepared.
 

Online statistics

Members online
255
Guests online
1,502
Total visitors
1,757

Forum statistics

Threads
164,021
Messages
4,378,757
Members
10,171
Latest member
ctfb19382


.
..
Top Bottom