- Joined
- Apr 20, 2016
- Messages
- 1,156
- Reaction Score
- 3,403
Yes I do..Do you not understand the differences between a 5 and a 3?
Yes I do..Do you not understand the differences between a 5 and a 3?
Bueckers, Westbrook or Muhl. Three options.I agree. Next year Geno will have options at the guard spot if Christyn continues to struggle. Right now his only option at that position is Molly Bent. Next year that option will be Paige Bueckers. That's a world of difference, and an embarrassment of riches when your first guard off the bench is the number one recruit in the class of 2020.
I'm sorry but yes CW is struggling very much as posters are stating--those numbers you are referencing are fattened by the fact that Geno is playing CW nearly the whole game to help her regain her confidence and she's getting a lot of her points in garbage time against inferior talent while the other starters have long gone to the bench. Yes, I am very much suggesting the team would be better off if CW's minutes were reduced and Griffin were allowed to play more.... she could put up almost the same amount of points, more rebounds, more steals, more hustle plays... I don't see the absurdity in that..
Again, here is the incredible myopia that seems to exist at this board: first of all< I did not state the CW should be wholly benched, I stated that her minutes should be reduced due to lack of contribution, like any other player who experiences a considerable delta in performance. I don't know why this simple sports process is causing so much heresy here... And no, CW is has not demonstrated herself to be an elite basketball player--she is not even a consistently good player--this year, she has shown sporadic glimpses of being elite. Hey, I do hope that CW pulls out of this, and I am really rooting for her, but she's nowhere near "elite", or a being "key cog".You should be banned from the board for thinking CW should be benched for Aubrey to start. Christyn is a key cog in our offense, Aubrey barely knows the offense. I LOVVVVVVE Aubrey, but she is effective depending on matchups. Christyn is an elite basketball player, Aubrey is an elite athlete who hasn’t learned to play basketball yet.
Again, here is the incredible myopia that seems to exist at this board: first of all< I did not state the CW should be wholly benched, I stated that her minutes should be reduced due to lack of contribution, like any other player who experiences a considerable delta in performance. I don't know why this simple sports process is causing so much heresy here... And no, CW is has not demonstrated herself to be an elite basketball player--she is not even a consistently good player--this year, she has shown sporadic glimpses of being elite. Hey, I do hope that CW pulls out of this, and I am really rooting for her, but she's nowhere near "elite", or a being "key cog".
Now here's a fine example of disassociated logic: do you actually believe that CW would average 15 ppg in the SEC the way she's been playing? Do you think she would have been first team SEC like she was in the AAC?If Christyn was on South Carolina's team, and if I would to tell you she would be the high scorer...would you believe me?
Now here's a fine example of disassociated logic: do you actually believe that CW would average 15 ppg in the SEC the way she's been playing? Do you think she would have been first team SEC like she was in the AAC?
Cincy, USF and Houston are not the same as the play that I see in the SEC...
What she does need to do more of immediately is to contribute to the floor game- rebounds, deflections, passes, assists, and defense. Forget about the scoring and it will come back but even if she averages 20 points a game but if those other areas aren't improved upon we aren't improved much as a team with the extra points. That is a big difference between Meg and her. Meg has made herself into an all around player who does these other things quietly but effectively and can be a great passer when she doesn't try to force because she anticipates the movement of her teammates very well. We talked all season about CW not adjusting to her position and role on this team this year but yet she has had All AAC numbers in an admitted down year. For the NCAAs though we need the floor game too and now is the time to start doing it. It's very easy to score in transition on this team. Get downcourt as fast as you can and either CD or Anna will find you!Some of you people need to come back to Earth! Is Williams struggling this year? Yes, but NOWHERE near as much as some posters would lead you to believe! She is averaging 15/5/2, those are damn respectable numbers! She was 1st team All AAC, and she will start and play damn near play 40mins EVERY game the rest of the way! To suggest that the team would be better off with Griffin starting is just utterly absurd!
Here is the thing; yes, Christyn is in a shooting slump but she can, and has, gone off and scored 20+ points. Therefore, opposing coaches can’t leave her unguarded and may in fact game plan to contain her to certain spots on the court. Aubrey is - currently - most dangerous under the basket and unable to hurt teams beyond 4-6 feet. So what happens? Me, I’d double team to take Crystal or Meg out of the game. Crystal, because that would disrupt UConn’s offense and Meg, who can score quickly in a variety of ways make the team go. Sure, Aubrey might score 15 points but smothering Crystal would hurt the team immenselyWhy does Aubrey need an outside shot in order to start. Live doesn't. "Let me count the ways" that Aubrey contributes to winning ...
You hit the nail on the head. While some of Christyn’s offensive problems are in her head, she’s definitely had to adjust her shooting rhythm this season. Last season with Pheesa drawing attention inside and Lou outside, Christyn had time to catch, measure her shot and then let it go. This year she’s had to accelerate her release and as a result Christyn has been inconsistent.I think that the major difference between this year and next year will be the extra second she will hopefully get to set herself for her shot. The rebounding should be better and with the experiences the ladies have this year and what is coming in, hopefully, the passing.
Going out on a limb here, but isn't it 2? We could ask Molly. She is a math major.Do you not understand the differences between a 5 and a 3?
Hello. And you are????? I am sure your resume will make Geno's 35 years of doing this look sad and pathetic.... but why not tell us how you are qualified to determine that CW needs to be on a short "leash".Man what a disappointing season for Christyn Willimas. I'm sure Geno will continue to start her, but for the teams sake I hope he has a very short leash for her. She contributed absolutely nothing in the 1st half versus Temple. A bit better in the 2nd, but the game was over by then. Soo much talent is locked up inside her, maybe a psychologist/mental coach is needed.
Man what a disappointing season for Christyn Willimas. I'm sure Geno will continue to start her, but for the teams sake I hope he has a very short leash for her. She contributed absolutely nothing in the 1st half versus Temple. A bit better in the 2nd, but the game was over by then. Soo much talent is locked up inside her, maybe a psychologist/mental coach is needed.
I'm sorry but yes CW is struggling very much as posters are stating--those numbers you are referencing are fattened by the fact that Geno is playing CW nearly the whole game to help her regain her confidence and she's getting a lot of her points in garbage time against inferior talent while the other starters have long gone to the bench. Yes, I am very much suggesting the team would be better off if CW's minutes were reduced and Griffin were allowed to play more.... she could put up almost the same amount of points, more rebounds, more steals, more hustle plays... I don't see the absurdity in that..
LOL. Seriously?Good psychology would be start Aubrey in her place .. eh?
For the SEC teams with strong centers, I would vote for 15 ppg from CW. UConn this year does not have a strong inside game - allows defenders to stay outside on shooters. Similar to Anna, CW needs to get pass while she is open. Today, CW typically gets ball while guarded 30 feet from basket. Few can put up big numbers with these options.Now here's a fine example of disassociated logic: do you actually believe that CW would average 15 ppg in the SEC the way she's been playing? Do you think she would have been first team SEC like she was in the AAC?
Cincy, USF and Houston are not the same as the play that I see in the SEC...
Your post got me thinking about AEH. Last season with 6’7” Tiera McCowan at Center, she was a key contributor for MS St as their designated sharpshooter. With McCowan gone, AEH’s shooting percentage has dropped substantially, and she now finds herself as the 8th or 9th option for the Bulldogs.For the SEC teams with strong centers, I would vote for 15 ppg from CW. UConn this year does not have a strong inside game - allows defenders to stay outside on shooters. Similar to Anna, CW needs to get pass while she is open. Today, CW typically gets ball while guarded 30 feet from basket. Few can put up big numbers with these options.