- Joined
- Jan 6, 2015
- Messages
- 7,015
- Reaction Score
- 57,048
That would be the biggest college basketball event of all time.Even without a season they could do the ultimate bracket tournament with all the teams making it in.
But then who would Dickie V whine about not getting in???Even without a season they could do the ultimate bracket tournament with all the teams making it in.
I'd love to see how you seed 355 teams.That would be the biggest college basketball event of all time.
Start with having all one-bid conferences do a single-elimination tournament and the winners advance to whatever the next level of the tournament would be.I'd love to see how you seed 355 teams.
I'd love to see how you seed 355 teams.
The same way you seed 68. Anyone bitching about their seed gets mocked. We already know the big guys will get seeded favorably so why cry about it?I'd love to see how you seed 355 teams.
Well done.Hire Laurie Fine?
I'd love to see how you seed 355 teams.
Hire Laurie Fine?
Well done.
Good idea. Wonder who would come out of the AAC.Start with having all one-bid conferences do a single-elimination tournament and the winners advance to whatever the next level of the tournament would be.
Imagine if our first games back in the BE were MSG BET games for the only spot in the tourney the conference gets. Not ideal for the season as a whole but how amazing would that be to watch?Start with having all one-bid conferences do a single-elimination tournament and the winners advance to whatever the next level of the tournament would be.
I'd love to see how you seed 355 teams.
Wouldn't the teams be doing the seeding?Hire Laurie Fine?
I am so down for this. I'd take a month off to watch all the games I could.Even without a season they could do the ultimate bracket tournament with all the teams making it in.
My take is that we already do it now, if you consider the conference tournaments as the early rounds. If we went to one big overall bracket it would kill the conference tournaments and the money they bring in would be effectively diverted to the NCAA. That's why I'm against it.Why are we not doing this anyway???
To clarify, I wouldn't want one big bracket to become the rule. But this season it would would be a cool one-off. Each conference would be free to run the season the way they see fit without worrying about the big dance, the teams would be playing for a conference title.No way would they do a straight feeder bracket from conference tournaments. How do you explain at large teams the following year?
This wouldn't be too difficult. There are 32 D1 leagues.
Do the best you can ranking the top 32 teams. Everyone left plays off in their league, single elimination to fill the final 32 spots. 64 teams. That would give all the winners about 3 or 4 games to make the tournament.
Take the original 32 ranked teams and break them into 4 sections, 8 teams each and do another single elimination tourny to get their rank going into the tournament. Coin flips for first round losers for the 7/8 seed, etc. That way they all get between 1 and 3 games to prepare for the tournament. Maybe even have the first round losers play the second round losers in exhibitions just to get another game in.
You can even bubble all the mini tourneys.
Again do the best you can to rank the 32 play in teams and seed it as normal. Best quad winner from original ranking vs the worst play in winner, 2nd best quad winner vs the next and so on.
Tons of TV worthy games - best March Madness ever.
Done!
Just one more day of games gets every program involved.Make a 256 team tournament with pods of 4.