Gabby Williams | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Gabby Williams

I agree that for many types of music, analog is better. Sound is a fundamentally analog thing. For a lot of classical, folk, etc., the incredible quiet parts are better with digital.

For me the biggest reason for going digital was merely convenience. I don’t spend much time at all just listening, so superior sound isn’t a driving factor. But being able to put six hours of music on the platter for me flat out beats having to put a new record on every 15-25 minutes. And as Jordy pointed out, CD’s take up much less space.
Unfortunately that kind of dead, vacuum space doesn't exist in the concert hall. These halls are full of people and air, and vinyl best portrays, to me, that reality.
 
1200 is this the best of the best?
upload_2017-12-26_5-54-12.jpeg
 
disco... the Bee Gees and Donna Summers, love those! y Pandora stays on EWF

but the same outfit also does several different refurbishments of the Technics tables. Here's one:

IMG_5415.jpe


ARTISAN FIDELITY

Not saying these are the world's most expensive or best turntables, but they do a really job on some cool vintage decks:cool:
 
I prefer this restored and reimagined Garrard 401 from Artisan Fidelity:

:p

View attachment 27214
but the same outfit also does several different refurbishments of the Technics tables. Here's one:

View attachment 27215

ARTISAN FIDELITY

Not saying these are the world's most expensive or best turntables, but they do a really job on some cool vintage decks:cool:
Such beautiful tables. You have, as I, expensive tastes my friend. Here's one of my table, a VPI Classic 4. I have a Shelter Harmony.


VPI-Classic-3-white-bckg.jpg
 
Last edited:
.-.
but the same outfit also does several different refurbishments of the Technics tables. Here's one:

View attachment 27215

ARTISAN FIDELITY

Not saying these are the world's most expensive or best turntables, but they do a really job on some cool vintage decks:cool:
Here's my friend Marshall's which I drool over regularly. It's a little more affordable (a little) than the Titan. Arm included. The Kronos Sparta.

Kronos%20Sparta%20HR.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back in my youth, my parents spun their disks on something like this little baby. You could stack up a bunch of 45s with a quick switch-over to LPs. Very convenient with it's own handle. You could even have music in the kitchen if you wanted. :)

We thought it was high tech.....

old-record-player-1960-s-27411609.jpg
 
Back in my youth, my parents spun their disks on something like this little baby. You could stack up a bunch of 45s with a quick switch-over to LPs. Very convenient with it's own handle. You could even have music in the kitchen if you wanted. :)

We thought it was high tech.....

View attachment 27219
Here's what we had in our living room growing up. A complete system. Who could want more?
maxresdefault.jpg
 
Here's the one from VPI I'm currently drooling over. I heard it in action at the last NYC Audio Show.

vpi_titan_turntable_review_matej_isak_mono_and_stereo_2017_2018%2B-%2B1.jpg
Why two tonearms? Two cartridges optimized for different types of music?
 
.-.
Why two tonearms? Two cartridges optimized for different types of music?
Many audiophiles have two arms on tables that allow for it, some up a to 4 arms, for multiple purposes: For different types of music, for mono and stereo, in order to have different cartridges (because boy, do these things sound different) for status, because they got like that etc. I would love to have another arm with a quality mono cartridge. I believe the VPI Titan can hold up to 3 arms. Harry Weisfeld who makes and owns VPI along with his son Mat (both whom I've met many times) are fans I believe of the new Air Tight Magnum Opus, which I have heard in a shoot out with their PC-1. Yeah, the MO is leaps and bounds above the PC-1, but the cost of entry for either is eye crossingly expensive. I even stuttered when I heard the MO's price.
 
Last edited:
Here's my friend Marshall's which I drool over regularly. It's a little more affordable (a little) than the Titan. Arm included. The Kronos Sparta.

"Affordable" is a relative term. By my standards NONE of these are attainable :(
 
"Affordable" is a relative term. By my standards NONE of these are attainable :(
Note I did say "eye crossiingly expensive". I still stutter when I mention their prices. I also stutter when I hear them in action.
 
And let's not forget that as good as some of those turntables are, the real celebrated analog technology among the audiophiles these days is reel-to-reel tape. Do you want this machine, an old TASCAM that's been extremely heavily modified with brand new heads and circuitry all around?

OawdDC3.jpg


It will only set you back $21,000 or so.

Want some albums for your $21k tape player, playing at 15 inches per second? (normal consumer tape players back in the day played at 7.5 or 3.75 inches per second) As it turns out, they have started making some albums in this format. They will only set you back four or five hundred dollars each.

edit: This is a nice video on the subject, covering the history of reel-to-reel formats and the newer extremely expensive audiophile variant of it:
 
Williams made a wise choice selecting basketball over track, but I sure would like to have seen what she would have developed into as a high jumper. Just a beautifully graceful athlete who seems to have a different gravitational pull than the rest of us.

She represents UCONN as a true student-athlete.
 
.-.
Back in my youth, my parents spun their disks on something like this little baby. You could stack up a bunch of 45s with a quick switch-over to LPs. Very convenient with it's own handle. You could even have music in the kitchen if you wanted. :)

We thought it was high tech.....

View attachment 27219
That apparently was Hi Tech. I keep looking for the crank---NOW that was Hi Tech, at the extreme. Mica reproducers, does the world get better than that??
 
Here's what we had in our living room growing up. A complete system. Who could want more?
maxresdefault.jpg
We had something similar, but with a 9” tv in the center. Made before 1949. Don’t remember what my parents did with it. I know the turntable was used for many years.
 
We had something similar, but with a 9” tv in the center. Made before 1949. Don’t remember what my parents did with it. I know the turntable was used for many years.
Here's the TV I watched Merrytoon Circus, Captain Kangaroo and Mr. Greenjean's.


magnavox-mediterranean-color-tv-1.jpg


Surprisingly, I don't miss it one bit. Kinda miss Emmit Kelly though.
 
And let's not forget that as good as some of those turntables are, the real celebrated analog technology among the audiophiles these days is reel-to-reel tape. Do you want this machine, an old TASCAM that's been extremely heavily modified with brand new heads and circuitry all around?

OawdDC3.jpg


It will only set you back $21,000 or so.

Want some albums for your $21k tape player, playing at 15 inches per second? (normal consumer tape players back in the day played at 7.5 or 3.75 inches per second) As it turns out, they have started making some albums in this format. They will only set you back four or five hundred dollars each.

edit: This is a nice video on the subject, covering the history of reel-to-reel formats and the newer extremely expensive audiophile variant of it:

These are the guys who make the new RTR's that people in the audiophile community are going bat crazy for. It's not actually a Tascam, it's made by a bunch of guys called United Home Audio. Their latest is called the Ultimata 2, and yeah, 21K. RTR is really the ultimate analog, but the tapes are mad expensive. $250 I think new. Believe it or not though, 21K is cheap for high end transducer front ends (Turntables, Tape decks etc). High end (not audiophile stuff, which are cheaper) TT's really start at about 8k and can go up to about $1,000,000! Fortunately including arm, although not all. High end cartridges start at about 2k and can go up to about 50K! All of these high end companies make little profit from long and costly R&D and meager sales. It's a rarified world for sure, but the high end of any product is going to be costly. By the way, it was the audiop(h)ile community that invented the terms "High Definition" and "High End".
 
Last edited:
Williams made a wise choice selecting basketball over track, but I sure would like to have seen what she would have developed into as a high jumper. Just a beautifully graceful athlete who seems to have a different gravitational pull than the rest of us.

She represents UCONN as a true student-athlete.
Very nice of you to say.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,388
Messages
4,570,158
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom