What a tool Lunardi can be
True but Bracketology is basically a Lunardi invention so he should be a leader not a follower.....the numbers for UConn universally require a 7 seed at minimum.....which should be the floor regardless of tonight.
He always claims a crazy success rate on his last bracket before selection sunday..once all the direct bids are known and only 2-3 questions remain....earlier in the process..probably not so good
Yup.
This used to piss me off so much when I cared about it more. He’d claim this 99% success rate when the whole bracket was basically known. Now he’s proven himself to be an clown not worth paying attention to. Just like the network he works for.
Oklahoma quadrants
| 5-9 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 6-0 |
| 3-3 | 3-3 | 6-0 | 3-0 |
Let’s not go crazy here. Gonzaga is 26-0 with most their wins as blowouts.
More importantly, do these guys actually watch the teams?
He's like any company first to market with a new product or service............instant aura of respectability and/or quality until it becomes evident to even the "casual fans" that you're as good a coach as 'ole Roy and as valuable as a UNC degree in Afro and African-American studies.
There is no explanation for us being an 8 or 9 because we're not an 8 or 9, Lunardi is an idiot.
We’re not beating scrubs either.
I know it's not nice to criticize Gonzaga, but all their quality wins were fairly early, especially Kansas and West Virginia, so it will be interesting to see if the usual failure in the tournament rears its ugly head again.
That’s fair. I was thinking the same thing. However, they did win them....they have beaten everyone on their schedule. Gotta give credit where credit is due.
Oklahoma has now lost 5 or 6, including a loss to 9-20 Kansas State. Oklahoma struggled with 2-22 ISU Wednesday and got their wheels blown off in the first half to Kansas (who isn't great this year) last night. They are inconsistent as inconsistent comes.
