It was extremely biased tbh.Very pro Carolina in my opinion
And the viewers, when a whistle blows I want to know what it was for. Too much babble, what Gus said above.A looonnng interview with Pheesa during the game really annoyed me - just disrespectful to the players.
They have a lot to play for still this year. If SC is the best team UCONN showed it belongs in the same gym with them.I loved the part where they went on and on about how the ball was out on Edwards and that Boston never touched the ball..... come to find out it was the complete opposite. Boston had her hand on it and it went out and Edwards did not touch it.
Those two ladies were so certain about things then they watched the replays and they had to eat a couple servings of crow. And prior to the game it was a homer SC feel.
I cannot wait until next year assuming everyone is healthy....
See, this doesn’t bother me. South Carolina is the reigning national champion, current #1 ranked team, with last year’s national POY. When UConn was in the same position, the coverage was equally gushy over the Huskies to the point Geno actually said he wished sportscasters would talk about someone else.Game announcers were bad. Constant jabber with some pertinent game info. A lot of bias toward SC.
Biggest problem; keeping up with the fouls. At least they caught the hand off in the last two minutes that totally changed the game. Three points down with the ball if that is called.I had to keep looking up stats online to find out how many points or fouls a player had. And most times, we weren’t told what the foul was. I may need to start listening to the radio during games
Ha! Good point. I hadn't even noticed that.My biggest complaint was the segment with Napheesa. That should have been a half time feature. I was glad to not have a sideline reporter to add insult to injury.
Agree. Talked a lot but didn't add any value in terms in insight into the game or creative thoughts.I don't know, a bit verbose for me.
What? Everyone loves Holly Rowe!I'm hust glad Holly Rowe wasn't on the sideline.
All the interruptions... interviews, side boxes, announcers talking about anything but... are all (being charitable) to expand the audience for WCBB, in the nature of human interest stories. Those of us who love the 3D, vivid display of "basketball thinking" don't need that stuff. The magic of movement to a purpose is wonderful enough.A looonnng interview with Pheesa during the game really annoyed me - just disrespectful to the players.