- Joined
- Oct 15, 2012
- Messages
- 4,514
- Reaction Score
- 18,011
NopeAresco surely to make a call to Idaho... and the big question is, would such a call ever lead to a second conversation.
NopeAresco surely to make a call to Idaho... and the big question is, would such a call ever lead to a second conversation.
Boise State just filed a lawsuit against the Mountain West Conference.
Even if they left the MWC, wouldn't they just go AAC for football and WAC for everything else?Getting juicy! Go Indy, Go!
So if the other schools in the conference vote no against unequal revenue sharing can't they just tell Boise they are free to walk? Comparing it with UConn's situation, they were unhappy with the paywall for its BB programs so they bounced.I read BSU's complaint. Sometimes, when you read a complaint, you conclude that the facts stated by the plaintiff just can't be true, because the defendant couldn't have thought it would have gotten away with its actions. This is such a complaint. From the alleged facts BSU was wronged and is owed money, but I'm guessing the MWC will have a very different belief of the facts leading up to the contract. We'll see.
So if the other schools in the conference vote no against unequal revenue sharing can't they just tell Boise they are free to walk? Comparing it with UConn's situation, they were unhappy with the paywall for its BB programs so they bounced.
Exactly. The conference may have a by-law that says any other contract can be negated by conference majority.Depends on what the rest of the agreements between BSU and MWC -- and the conferences organizational documents -- provide for.
Exactly. The conference may have a by-law that says any other contract can be negated by conference majority.
It just may be best for the other schools to let them leave and take their TV rights. Boise is the most valuable school in that league, but they just may be too much of a pain in the rear to deal with.It could, but that presumes that BSU are idiots to negotiate for special rights and not make clear that those special rights can't be taken away without its consent.
My instinct is that MWC is going to say BSU consented to this, maybe with a statement like "if you can get us over $5M a year we don't need a special right any more." Because otherwise, it just wouldn't make sense based on the provisions BSU quoted.
As for throwing them out, it's difficult to believe that BSU entered an arrangement where it could be thrown out and MWC could keep the TV monies from BSU home games. And MWC absolutely wants that money.
time out called...