He transferred to LaSalle after two seasons. Last night he lit up URI for 29/23 in an OT loss.
Hard to imagine a guy that skinny dominating the glass.He was really good too bad he turned it over at the end of the game with an awful decision trying to dribble through a double team.
Hard to imagine a guy that skinny dominating the glass.
He went to Kobe Bryant's HS (Lower Merion). He'll have to beef up a bit to make it in the pros. He won't rip down 23 boards in that league(not in one game, anyway).Saw him in person a few weeks ago (Richmond vs. LaSalle). He is insanely athletic with a lot of bounce. Looked like the only pro prospect on the floor and really stood out
Hurley has 4 guards on the floor at all times and they’re still a much better rebounding team than UConn, not to mention just a flat out better team all around. Every team has players go off against them, the difference is URI is actually winning games consistently.If he got 23 rebounds against us the "anti-Ollie" brigade would blame it on the fact he's not teaching during practice how to box out blah blah blah. Hence my post elsewhere about being careful what you wish for. Hurley had no answer to keep him off the boards, but hey they want him so you won't hear anything. He's the new shiny toy so they say! Hope so I really do if that's the choice.
Hurley has 4 guards on the floor at all times and they’re still a much better rebounding team than UConn, not to mention just a flat out better team all around. Every team has players go off against them, the difference is URI is actually winning games consistently.
Yeah, that was crazy. I'm still not sure the first attempted miss(at the end of regulation) really hit the rim.I had a way way way way bigger problem with Rhode Island fouling up 3 in situations where they shouldn’t.
I’m all for using it in the right spot but up 3 with 1.9 in the backcourt gives them life.
Not sure I’ve seen a team make two in a row they tried to miss.
Yeah, that was crazy. I'm still not sure the first attempted miss(at the end of regulation) really hit the rim.
Agreed--you're pushing your luck by repeatedly fouling to stop the 3. At some point just play D.
I had a way way way way bigger problem with Rhode Island fouling up 3 in situations where they shouldn’t.
I’m all for using it in the right spot but up 3 with 1.9 in the backcourt gives them life.
Not sure I’ve seen a team make two in a row they tried to miss.
Yeah, that was crazy. I'm still not sure the first attempted miss(at the end of regulation) really hit the rim.
Agreed--you're pushing your luck by repeatedly fouling to stop the 3. At some point just play D.
Pretty sure I know that. Also that great rebounding team was down 29-12on the boards at halftime to a very small LaSalle team. I said he gets them to play hard and they win in the A10. Hell we wouldn't win in the A10 under Ollie I know that but this just might not be the answer, that's all I'm saying.
As I recall they had a 2nd-half lead against Oregon but tried running the clock too early. The Ducks caught 'em.It took me a little longer to buy Hurley's stock than others, but in the last twelve months or so he has left me very little to criticize. They absolutely should have knocked off a really good Oregon team in the round of 32 last year (I don't remember the specifics, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't his fault), and given how wide open that tournament ended up being, they could have had a realistic shot at winning the whole thing.
I'm not sure how good they are this year because the A-10 is really down. But when you watch them play they do all of the things that well-coached teams do, by and large. Granted, those things can change quickly (we remember how well-coached the first couple Ollie teams were), but given his track record of turning around I think three programs now, I think you have to acknowledge that this guy can coach.
My point was that you can’t draw a conclusion off of one game just because they didn’t win by as many points as projected.Pretty sure I know that. Also that great rebounding team was down 29-12on the boards at halftime to a very small LaSalle team. I said he gets them to play hard and they win in the A10. Hell we wouldn't win in the A10 under Ollie I know that but this just might not be the answer, that's all I'm saying.
Would an up-and-coming coach want to take over a program that's under investigation?My point was that you can’t draw a conclusion off of one game just because they didn’t win by as many points as projected.
There’s risk to any coaching hire for sure, Hurley has as good of a chance as any realistic hire. Geographically similar recruiting grounds, and he’s doing more with less, which is a necessity in the AAC. He now has the public perception of being a rising star which will aid him too.
You’re obviously within reason by having doubts, but I’m not sure what better options are there for us (assuming there will be a new coach).
Probably not all of them, but Hurley wants the job. I think he’s ours if we pay him the money he wants/could get elsewhere.Would an up-and-coming coach want to take over a program that's under investigation?
You know this?Probably not all of them, but Hurley wants the job. I think he’s ours if we pay him the money he wants/could get elsewhere.
Don't hold your breath for an answerYou know this?
They were offered but not going to play a lotAs I recall they had a 2nd-half lead against Oregon but tried running the clock too early. The Ducks caught 'em.
I checked the URI roster and noticed most of the good players (Matthews, Dowtin, Terrell) were offered scholarships by some strong programs--yet Hurley got them all. Evidently he's a pretty good recruiter.
Thamel: Spreadsheets, wiretaps and bank records detail payment scheme in hoops corruption caseWould an up-and-coming coach want to take over a program that's under investigation?
YesYou know this?