BLit on twitter told me no other offers but he is coming out with a story soon. kid is a ghost town on google cept for a couple small things that were posted in this thread already. FUMA puts out like Milford if not better, i wonder if he got stuck behind a big time rb there and thats why we aren't seeing alot. imagine being stuck behind dobbs at milford for example?
i'm trying to get some vids right now, he is #28. he might have played some db as well...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RZtbz_3DPw
pic of him at 1:27 mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMIIAEp1jg4&feature=related
1:40 mark, #28 with a pic here but the mic man says a different players name. hmmm
Here is a blurb from Scout -
As a senior, Williams attended Emmaus (Pa.)he totaled 130 carries for 1,283 yards and 18 touchdowns. Ran a 10.5/10.4 100-meters.
As a Post-Grad, Williams had 35 carries for 480 yards and six touchdowns.
9.9 YPC in high school and 13.7 YPC at FUMA, huh?
Can't argue with the production. Hopefully it translates, we need someone to help immediately. I like the kid's size.
If your school has a kid who averages 13 yards per carry, and only carries it 35 times over the course of a season, may I suggest you need a better coach.
Here is a blurb from Scout -
As a senior, Williams attended Emmaus (Pa.)he totaled 130 carries for 1,283 yards and 18 touchdowns. Ran a 10.5/10.4 100-meters.
As a Post-Grad, Williams had 35 carries for 480 yards and six touchdowns.
For all the board regulars, this topic gets brought up every year around this time-the meaning of Track & Field times, the distinction between "fast" and "quick", etc....Without rehashing every little nuance that can come up I do want to point out something for any newcomers to the board that might not know specifics about the reporting of Track times-if a Track & Field time is listed only to the "tenths" spot (like a 10.4 in the 100meter dash), that means it was timed by hand. If a Track & field time is listed to the "hundredths" spot (say, a 10.47 in the 100m), then it "should" have been done electronically and can be counted on for greater accuracy. Sometimes coaches will report a hand time to the hundredths and that is not allowable, but obviously no one on these boards knows if that happens when a time is reported to the hundredths. Over the years I have seen coaches who simply suck at hand timing and get wacky results despite honest efforts to do it right, and I have seen coaches that frankly, I question their ethics since I see them constantly submit hand times for kids that FAR EXCEED what the kids end up doing at States with electronic timing.He has run a 10.4 100 meters. That is flat out flying.
This is a rough conversion, 100-meter time converted to 40-yard dash time;
10.2 --- 4.34
10.3 --- 4.38
10.4 --- 4.43
10.5 --- 4.49
10.6 --- 4.54
10.7 --- 4.58
10.8 --- 4.63
10.9 --- 4.75
11.0 --- 4.85
See this is why you can't really put too much weight on these recruiting websites. 10.45 speed in the 100m? Maybe. NOT.
You'd find him a lot easier in the USA track and field olympic qualifiers if that were true, rather than a football recruiting website.
For reference sake, a 10.45 in the 100m he would have placed either 2nd or 3rd in the big east finals in May 2011, against much more physically mature runners.
(Kashif Moore ran a 10.79 and placed 15th)
This young man is fast though. Very fast for his size and weight.
The kid was clocked in a PA regional track meet as a 12th grader, officially timed, in the 100m in April 2011, a month before kashif ran that 10.79 and came in at 11.05 seconds.
6'0" 205 lbs, runs a 4.5 forty and averaged almost 14 ypc at FUMA and doesn't have any other offers?
Stats were skewed by a couple of long runs.
If you understood math or statistics you'd agree with me... but I'm happy he's coming anyway. At least he can outrun the defensive ends we have.Well, according to at least person on this board, those 70 yard runs will skew his numbers and make him look better than he actually is. So buyer beware.
If you understood math or statistics you'd agree with me... but I'm happy he's coming anyway. At least he can outrun the defensive ends we have.
If you understood math or statistics you'd agree with me... but I'm happy he's coming anyway. At least he can outrun the defensive ends we have.
If you understood math or statistics you'd agree with me... but I'm happy he's coming anyway. At least he can outrun the defensive ends we have.
Pay attention to Businesslawyer's first rule of holes. When in one, stop digging.
He has run a 10.4 100 meters. That is flat out flying.
This is a rough conversion, 100-meter time converted to 40-yard dash time;
10.2 --- 4.34
10.3 --- 4.38
10.4 --- 4.43
10.5 --- 4.49
10.6 --- 4.54
10.7 --- 4.58
10.8 --- 4.63
10.9 --- 4.75
11.0 --- 4.85
For all the board regulars, this topic gets brought up every year around this time-the meaning of Track & Field times, the distinction between "fast" and "quick", etc....Without rehashing every little nuance that can come up I do want to point out something for any newcomers to the board that might not know specifics about the reporting of Track times-if a Track & Field time is listed only to the "tenths" spot (like a 10.4 in the 100meter dash), that means it was timed by hand. If a Track & field time is listed to the "hundredths" spot (say, a 10.47 in the 100m), then it "should" have been done electronically and can be counted on for greater accuracy. Sometimes coaches will report a hand time to the hundredths and that is not allowable, but obviously no one on these boards knows if that happens when a time is reported to the hundredths. Over the years I have seen coaches who simply suck at hand timing and get wacky results despite honest efforts to do it right, and I have seen coaches that frankly, I question their ethics since I see them constantly submit hand times for kids that FAR EXCEED what the kids end up doing at States with electronic timing.
Not commenting at all about this kid's ACTUAL speed since I have NO IDEA, but for the newbies, a 100m time listed to the tenths place needs to be taken with a HUGE grain of salt. Some of my kids run 11.1 hand times and consistently beat other kids who supposedly run 10.6 hand times.
As for this specific young man-welcome aboard! The staff must have been impressed if he committed all the way back in June.