Flaws of the top ten | Page 2 | The Boneyard
.-.

Flaws of the top ten

It'll be interesting to see if it lands that way. I also wonder if the committee would try to split it teams in the same conference. Perhaps flip Iowa St to the Midwest, Purdue to the South. We shall see.
good point on the conf...didn't think about that
 
Obviously like Hurley, we’re gonna hyperfocus on our team’s shortcomings, especially after witnessing the most dominant championship team of all time.

But who exactly do you put above UConn right now aside from Arizona? Everyone else has either worse losses or clearer flaws that put them lower. Hell, you could even argue Arizona is a Reed and Mullins away from being in that group.

Michigan: Too volatile; maybe higher ceiling but much lower floor (also lack high end wins)
Duke: Backcourt is lacking
Iowa State: Maybe but lost by 20+ @ a flawed Kansas
Houston: Loss to Tennessee; good but I don’t see them over us right now
Vanderbilt: lmao
 
It'll be interesting to see if it lands that way. I also wonder if the committee would try to split it teams in the same conference. Perhaps flip Iowa St to the Midwest, Purdue to the South. We shall see.
I know back in the day the NCAA Tournament Committee had a rule where teams from the same conference could not play against each other until the Elite 8. I believe that rule is largely in place now and they try to stick to that with some exceptions if a conference has a large number of teams in the NCAAT as it would be tougher with these super-sized conferences. Examples would include UConn playing Cincinnati in the 2nd round of the 2011 NCAAT when both were in the Big East and the Big East had 11 teams in the NCAAT. Also, Kentucky playing Tennessee in the Sweet 16 last year was another example as the SEC had 14 teams in the NCAAT.
 
Obviously like Hurley, we’re gonna hyperfocus on our team’s shortcomings, especially after witnessing the most dominant championship team of all time.

But who exactly do you put above UConn right now aside from Arizona? Everyone else has either worse losses or clearer flaws that put them lower. Hell, you could even argue Arizona is a Reed and Mullins away from being in that group.

Michigan: Too volatile; maybe higher ceiling but much lower floor (also lack high end wins)
Duke: Backcourt is lacking
Iowa State: Maybe but lost by 20+ @ a flawed Kansas
Houston: Loss to Tennessee; good but I don’t see them over us right now
Vanderbilt: lmao
I agree with this take. Not because I'm a UConn fan.
Sometimes when im watching a non-uconn game, I'll pretend that the favored team is my team. I watch them as though I'm watching uconn. I let every missed shot feel like a Mullins or AK miss.

Every great team does the same kind of stuff we gripe about.
 
.-.
We're better than the rest. Can't wait, although I'm not rushing time
 

This is a great visual but why didn’t he group and label BYU, Duke, and Fl? How would you label that group?
Also, what is the the game to game volatility scale based on(1.10 - 1.20)? Michigans loss was very bad but I don’t see that they are hugely volatile - like the scale shows. Unless it somehow penalizes them for large winning scores.
 
Last edited:
In the Pine Barrens?

Chris and/or Paulie should have been ended in the Pine Barrons. There is no way Valery would have run away without finishing at least one of the Soprano's keystone cops.
 
This is a great visual but why didn’t he group and label BYU, Duke, and Fl? How would you label that group?
Also, what is the the game to game volatility scale based on(1.10 - 1.20)? Michigans loss was very bad but I don’t see that they are hugely volatile - like the scale shows. Unless it somehow penalizes them for large winning scores.
1. Those other teams are also great, we and Arizona have simply distanced ourselves as especially elite

2. In any given game Michigan looks either unstoppable or incredibly vulnerable. This team beat top 10 Gonzaga by 40 and went on a streak of demolition against solid teams but at the beginning of the season and right now, they’ve looked terrible against worse competition (Wake Forest, TCU, Wisconsin, Penn State).
 
It'll be interesting to see if it lands that way. I also wonder if the committee would try to split it teams in the same conference. Perhaps flip Iowa St to the Midwest, Purdue to the South. We shall see.
They would 100% do that. You're not getting #1 and #2 seeds in the same region from the same conference. There may even be bracketing principles that forbid (or strongly discourage) it.

I also have a hard time seeing the Big 12 owning half of the top 8 seeds.
 
.-.
They would 100% do that. You're not getting #1 and #2 seeds in the same region from the same conference. There may even be bracketing principles that forbid (or strongly discourage) it.

I also have a hard time seeing the Big 12 owning half of the top 8 seeds.
I can see one being bumped for the SEC winner myself.
 
There’s also the expected offensive boost for UConn in the tourney, where they’ll be unfettered by Big East officiating
 

This is the best visualization for describing what my eyes have been telling me by watching games this year. Most of us believe we haven’t yet shown our best game (ie how far up the x-axis we can go
 

Online statistics

Members online
57
Guests online
5,780
Total visitors
5,837

Forum statistics

Threads
166,537
Messages
4,483,498
Members
10,358
Latest member
wynela


Top Bottom