- Joined
- Jun 10, 2012
- Messages
- 31,615
- Reaction Score
- 3,962
But Maya would have liked it, I bet!
My exact thoughts...
But Maya would have liked it, I bet!
Kelly was the best player on the board so I can see the Sun taking her even if she wasn't exactly what they needed. Really wanted Kelly to get to Minnesota or somehow drop to Phoenix in the 2nd round, but I was happy to see Moore go to Minnesota if Kelly couldn't.
Lawson, Montgomery, Hightower, White, Greene, and Faris give the Sun their 6 perimeter players for this season, and the one thing Kelly has over of all of those players is that she is the best passer out of all of them. Kelly's ability to actually make post entry passes into Tina will be something important she potentially brings to the Sun. There is just going to be much more pressure on Kelly to be an offensive threat out of the gate with the Sun than if she had a gone to a team with 2 true perimeter scorers like a Minnesota.
The battle for the roster spot, should there be one, would be between Kalana and McCray. Kelly fills the same roles but brings more than either of those two do. This is the second major injury to McCray in 3 years.
Did you watch her this year? She shot threes better than KML did last year.
This year she did. Reread the post you responded toI thought KML lead the nation in 3 point shooting?
The battle for the roster spot, should there be one, would be between Kalana and McCray. Kelly fills the same roles but brings more than either of those two do. This is the second major injury to McCray in 3 years.
Sorry if I wasn't clear.I thought KML lead the nation in 3 point shooting?
Asjha's roster spot would have to be maintained, I believe, so the Sun's player roster will be only 10 players. I don't think that they will also carry McCray if she is injured for the season, so I expect that she will be cut. (There is no real "IR" in the WNBA.) Johanna Leedham will probably make the team, taking one spot from a current player, and Kelly will take one spot. So some current player besides McCray will have to go. Greene, White, or Hightower, I would think. Hightower would be my guess.
Sorry if I wasn't clear.
In 2011-12, KML shot .432 overall and .384 from the arc.
In 2012-3, Kelly shot .530 and .415, respectively. Those are very good numbers. She was at .438 and .315 the prior year, so she became a much better shooter, basically by a whopping .100.
In 2012-13, KML was spectacular at .528 and .492.
Hmm, Kelly shot .530 overall, and Kaleena shot .528. Our latest first round pick has bragging rights--she outshot the best shooter in the country!
I think we will see Kelly's entry passing improve, as far as consistency, when she plays with Tina again. Tina gives the passer such a huge target--much bigger than Stef (not in height but in target size). Kelly had some lapses this year making entry passes and it was not a consistently strong suit for her. Tina gets lots of attention but in most games there will be enough spacing for Kelly to find her. Kelly really knows how to get you the ball even with a tight window but you have to be able to make the play on your end, Maya and Tina being great examples. And she is outstanding at hitting cutters IMO.
Scotter I have this many times. Timing and placement consistency is very important.Stef wasn't a problem as far as catching passes. Stef and Kallena were the only reliable targets. Most of the other players were struggling to be in the right spot and catch passes. Kelly struggled to make the adjustment to his year's roster largely being made up of players that struggled to be where they were supposed to be. Kelly tried to make the passes to Breanna for example that she made to Maya and Tiffany as well as Tina and more often than not a perfect pass was fumbled away or went out of bounds because the player never made the cut, or didn't make it hard enough.
44, note the "last year" in Milford's original statement. Kelly's figure this year was better than KML's last year.
Not my problem. I was only clarifying what you failed to understand.thanks for the clarification, but that is comparing apples to oranges. A total manipulation of statistics.