intlzncster
i fart in your general direction
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 28,910
- Reaction Score
- 60,188
If our OOC schedule wasn't loaded, I might agree. But the strength of our OOC schedule, coupled with what should be a much improved AAC, should produce a two seed in this hypothetical. Not to mention, college basketball is going to be lacking at the top this year - one and two seeds will likely have more losses than usual.
The preseason tournament should yield at least two games against top 25/50 competition. Then, there is Maryland, Ohio State, Georgetown, and Texas. That right there gets you to six games against top comp (OSU seems like the one question mark). Win three of those, rack up 15 wins in conference play, and win the AAC tournament and you have yourself a 28-6 team with a pretty complete resume.
Say we beat Michigan, Syracuse, Maryland, and Ohio State. That still leaves us with losses to Texas, Georgetown, and, for the sake of argument, Gonzaga. Now say you split with SMU, Cincinnati, and Tulsa. You're at six losses, but you have roughly a dozen quality victories. That's a two seed.
The problem with this setup, is that that it requires UCONN to win early, against serious talent. UCONN's got a lot of new pieces at key positions. If they don't gel right out of the gate, it could be an issue.
So, if you said NC or Final Four last year, edit yourself out.