Why can't we hate him as much as ISIS and call him a lying POS while still subtlely acknowledging he's done amazing things at UK and is the best recruiter ever?
I kid, I kid, but it is possible to hate someone's guts while acknowledging their skill. That's how I used to look at the Red Sox in the early-mid 2000s. I hated the duck out of them, but was also silently like "damn, they're good" whenever they played the Yanks.
As for Diallo, this doesn't shake my confidence in KO and the connections we've got between this kid and the program. For a lot of these kids, it's understandable for them to see getting the UK and Duke offers as legitimizing their greatness, while still not taking them seriously. I think about Malik Newman, who everybody thought was UK-bound, but decided on the hometown school that had been recruiting him longer (Probably not the best example because as far as we know he did take the UK offer seriously, but I can't think of a better one off the top of my head).
However, the playing time argument doesn't work here. Malik Monk had probably already filed the paperwork for the 2017 draft, and they've got no guards besides him, Fox, and Briscoe. Whoever UK lands, whether it be Diallo or someone like Gary Trent (who's probably Duke bound anyway) will be playing over 30 minutes a game automatically.
And I can definitely see the comparison between Daniels and Gabriel, in terms of ranking and development (NOT in their style). However, a player like that may not have 3 years to become a stud in UK's system. They could easily get lost in the shuffle of 2018 recruits, and so on. I do feel Gabriel is in danger of having this happen, but only time will tell.