I hope she succeeds there. Michigan lost a lot of its good players, so she might be carrying the team on her back freshman year. And especially being in the B1G with USC and UCLA there.I am looking forward to seeing how Syla Swords plays in Michigan and how that all plays out.
Heavy disagree, Ice seemed to finally understand her role during the BE/MM tournaments. Hardly fouled and played clean D in the BE tourney, hit a few clutch shots against USC, and wasn't a foul machine. Had a good post up and some decent rebounds as well. Funny how more pressure on her back seemed to make her into a better player. I expect she takes a decent leap from her RS year this season. Not expecting anything superstar caliber, but I think she will be a lot better from last season if her tournament performance is anything to show.The question about UConn's frontcourt is that none of the experienced players have played WELL.
I think @Gamecockfan77 makes a reasonable point. If this were the UConn page, I can see fussing over his point. But on the general page, this seems like a fair assessment. Here the point is to understand other teams and other fanbase’s perspectives. UConn’s bigs have limited experience of playing well, much less than SC’s. This is why SC ought to be seen as the favorite to win the NC. But the potential we all see in Jana Ice Sarah and Ayanna is why I think UConn should be right behind them.Heavy disagree, Ice seemed to finally understand her role during the BE/MM tournaments. Hardly fouled and played clean D in the BE tourney, hit a few clutch shots against USC, and wasn't a foul machine. Had a good post up and some decent rebounds as well. Funny how more pressure on her back seemed to make her into a better player. I expect she takes a decent leap from her RS year this season. Not expecting anything superstar caliber, but I think she will be a lot better from last season if her tournament performance is anything to show.
Griffin is also technically a front court player/wing. She played great until she was injured.
I get that but saying none of them played well is false. We all know what AG is capable of. There’s no denying that.I think @Gamecockfan77 makes a reasonable point. If this were the UConn page, I can see fussing over his point. But on the general page, this seems like a fair assessment. Here the point is to understand other teams and other fanbase’s perspectives. UConn’s bigs have limited experience of playing well, much less than SC’s. This is why SC ought to be seen as the favorite to win the NC. But the potential we all see in Jana Ice Sarah and Ayanna is why I think UConn should be right behind them.
We don’t need to talk about repeating the undefeated season. Won’t happen. Can we threepeat the undefeated regular season? Doubtful. Has even Geno done that? 2017 when we backdoored the NC? Too lazy to look it up and not very important anyway.
I disagree. The NC is SC’s to lose this year.UConn wall have a better frontcourt than 90% of the country and will likely be a top 5 team, maybe the best team.
But they need a lot more from players who haven't necessarily played well than SCar does.
We may well find that Cardoso is the difference between SCar being an undefeated national champ and being a team that might merely be top 10, but I don't think overall experience is necessarily the problem.
It would be the irreplaceable piece that is missing.
I personally do not think SCar is just a top 10 team but it's possible.
Same here. Fudd and Griffin are what they are at this point. Sophomore year leaps forward by Shade and Arnold would really level the playing field for UConn against USC.I am a little more worried as a Gamecock fan about your freshmen from last season taking a big step forward than I am about the return of Fudd and/or Griffin.
Arnold moving forward, Shade making the shots she was very willing to take.
The potential depth is definitely disconcerting though.