ESPN & The Big East | The Boneyard

ESPN & The Big East

For what it's worth, this deal makes having a Hulu live subscription a better choice than YouTube TV, because you can usually get a Hulu live bundled package that includes ESPN plus at about $83 a month.

I find it ironic that one of the reasons why we left the American was to avoid having Connecticut women's basketball games on ESPN plus. And yet, here we are. No one beats the mouse.
 
Another streaming service???? I'm hoping not many women's games are on ESPN+.
Anything not picked up on Fox, FS1, FS2, NBC, Peacock, TBS and TNT will be deposited here.
 
Last edited:
.-.
“A minimum of 75 women’s games”
And it's pretty likely that DePaul versus Butler probably won't be there first choice
 
Last edited:
And it's pretty likely that to DePaul versus Butler probably won't be there first choice
I think this is more about what isn't picked up elsewhere. I assume the other media companies in the pricier deal paid for higher-priority games.

Although I am sure they will throw a UConn game or two onto ESPN-plus just to be annoying.
 
For what it's worth, this deal makes having a Hulu live subscription a better choice than YouTube TV, because you can usually get a Hulu live bundled package that includes ESPN plus at about $83 a month.
This is important information for me. I already get Disney+ so it’s just a matter of upgrading to the Hululive package.
 
This is important information for me. I already get Disney+ so it’s just a matter of upgrading to the Hululive package.
You may have to cancel your Disney+ and then get the Hulu live deal that includes Disney+ and ESPN plus. You don't need another package, because this gives you the regular "cable lineup" of channels. Plus, you get all the Hulu movie and television show on demand functionality. I think it's the best deal relative to all the options available.

Make sure you also add UConn + to your smart TV, as I think there will be a lot of women's basketball content on similar to what was previously shown on SNY. There is no charge for this app.
 
I think this is more about what isn't picked up elsewhere. I assume the other media companies in the pricier deal paid for higher-priority games.

Although I am sure they will throw a UConn game or two onto ESPN-plus just to be annoying.
I don't know that every UConn woman's basketball game will be on the NBC TBS TNT platform. Minimally I would expect at least a few games on ESPN plus, but it may be more than that.
 
.-.
ESPN+ is garbage
Since it is school produced, the quality varies. I suspect UConn home games will be reasonable broadcasts. Away games? There's no guarantee.
 
For what it's worth, this deal makes having a Hulu live subscription a better choice than YouTube TV, because you can usually get a Hulu live bundled package that includes ESPN plus at about $83 a month.

I find it ironic that one of the reasons why we left the American was to avoid having Connecticut women's basketball games on ESPN plus. And yet, here we are. No one beats the mouse.
We are YouTube TV users. I bought Hulu live last year just so that I could get a couple of games that I really wanted to see. The steaming and technical issues were so bad that I immediately canceled Hulu. Never again.
 
We are YouTube TV users. I bought Hulu live last year just so that I could get a couple of games that I really wanted to see. The steaming and technical issues were so bad that I immediately canceled Hulu. Never again.
I used to use YouTube TV. On my old smart TV, YouTube TV was glitchy while Hulu live was not. I use Hulu live now and the quality is excellent.

Why our two experiences differed, I have no idea.
 
.-.
ESPN and The Big East (TV wise) are my childhood. Glad that they are going to continue with the streaming element.
 
For what it's worth, this deal makes having a Hulu live subscription a better choice than YouTube TV, because you can usually get a Hulu live bundled package that includes ESPN plus at about $83 a month.

I find it ironic that one of the reasons why we left the American was to avoid having Connecticut women's basketball games on ESPN plus. And yet, here we are. No one beats the mouse.
I always have used Hulu Live for the games and I'm excited that it'll be another worthwhile expenditure again this season. Better than having to pay for all the extra channels plus Peacock, etc etc.
 
I used to use YouTube TV. On my old smart TV, YouTube TV was glitchy while Hulu live was not. I use Hulu live now and the quality is excellent.

Why our two experiences differed, I have no idea.
I live in the absolute boondocks of Eastern Connecticut and we use tablets for our streaming. Hulu couldn’t reconcile that the physical address of the tablet was different than the connection point for our ISP. Many times that connection point is in Massachusetts or RI. As a result, Hulu would think we were out of market and not allow the connection, no matter how many times I allowed it to see the tablet location. Even when it did connect, it would freeze. We’ve just never had those issues with YouTube TV. Even when we travel, it asks if we are traveling, we say yes, and everything works fine.

I did try Hulu with our smart TV and a hardwired connection because they suggested that that might work. That didn’t work either. I suspect it’s just some combination of our ISP and Hulu not really getting along.
 
I find it ironic that one of the reasons why we left the American was to avoid having Connecticut women's basketball games on ESPN plus. And yet, here we are. No one beats the mouse.
Was that really a motivating factor in the departure? Or just fan speculation?

If FloSports was the alternative, then ESPN+ is a nirvana by comparison.
 
.-.
Can someone translate this conversation into some form of English and tell me how I get to watch the UConn Women games this upcoming season?
This information has not been circulated yet. But hopeful prognostications have been offered suggesting that the Hulu Live bundle might get us there, perhaps supplemented by UConn+.
 
Was that really a motivating factor in the departure? Or just fan speculation?

If FloSports was the alternative, then ESPN+ is a nirvana by comparison.
If I recall correctly, AD Dave expressly mentioned as a factor. Remember that the SNY deal was generating $1 million in revenue. That is twice what CBS Sports pays us for the football team. I don't think it was the factor, but it was a factor.

FloSports has been the big east partner for broadcasting Olympic sports for sometime. This is a step up for that.

It's a big step down for women's basketball. SNY was a linear partner who did a phenomenal job on broadcasting women's basketball games with dedicated pregame, halftime, and post game shows In addition to several other dedicated husky shows such as Geno's Legacy, which brought back women's basketball greats to Sit down with Auriemma and talk about their experience at Connecticut, in addition to preseason and postseason shows.
 
I've had Sling for years. I do not get ESPN+ with their plan, only ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPN3.
 
Was that really a motivating factor in the departure? Or just fan speculation?

If FloSports was the alternative, then ESPN+ is a nirvana by comparison.
It was a fight over the Tier 3 rights. The new AAC TV deal included the Tier 3 rights for women's basketball, and UConn did not like that because it would mean that SNY would be cut out and all of our games forced onto streaming.
 
I've had Sling for years. I do not get ESPN+ with their plan, only ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPN3.
I am pretty sure you can get a Hulu, Disney+, ESPN+ bundle for $9.99 a month. If you don't think you'll use it except for a few games during the season, you can toggle it on and off paying only for those months that there is a game you want to watch.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,497
Messages
4,578,529
Members
10,487
Latest member
husky62


Top Bottom