I agree that we won't here a lot of definitive answers from the practices. That's the way it should be. What's the point of having competition if it's decided before it starts and all the fans are informed of the results. That's not likely to happen. So the best we will get are snippets from the coaches and reactions from what the reporters have seen. That won't tell the true story unless someone is head and shoulders above the rest. It's not likely that a true freshman would start in the beginning of the season, but it remains to be seen how they match up with the veteran players. If one or two of them came in knowing the playbook (unlikely), able to make all the throws accurately, able to see and find the open receivers not just the primary target, able to avoid the rush, able to avoid the interceptions due to ball placement and showed that they did these at a higher rate than the veterans, they could win a spot on the depth chart. Although the goal would be to red-shirt these guys the staff need to evaluate exactly what they have and who gives us the best chance to win. I don't feel that what we had last season will in any way be acceptable, even though in many games I thought Chandler was our best offensive player. I feel that with Weist in charge of the offense, Day in charge of the QBs and Buggs in charge of the RBs we will get a 'fresh' evaluation of the players. I don't think much of this evaluation will be shared with us fans but as long as the correct pieces are put in place for us to be successful I'll be OK with that. Let the games begin!