- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 5,050
- Reaction Score
- 19,739
This sport is so broken . . .
It makes our success even more incredible when most teams literally have a new squad every year. The fact that we have the retention we do is incredible.
This sport is so broken . . .
True but don’t forget the key transfers…TNew, Joey,Cam,Haas,Allene,Tarris,SilasIt makes our success even more incredible when most teams literally have a new squad every year. The fact that we have the retention we do is incredible.
Oh of course. But we have a four year starter, three juniors, and a 2nd year center. Hurley has done a brilliant job of retaining pieces and putting the right players around them be them quick fix seniors, freshmen studs, or his really, really smart targeting of underclassmen portal guys to build some continuity. Michigan has five transfer startersTrue but don’t forget the key transfers…TNew, Joey,Cam,Haas,Allene,Tarris,Silas
They highly prefer it - you don't have to spend 3 years courting a player to get him to come. It's more transactional, and it's said that in many cases the player recruits the school.The funny thing is that many coaches like the current system much better. It is a lot less work and a lot less time and effort spent on kids who will never come to the school.
Old days: follow teenagers around for years; try to project what the kid will look like in 4 years when he is and adult; work coaches, shoe execs, family members, and the kid himself; and then lose when a slimy assistant for a Calipari or Pearl shows up with an envelope at the end.
Now: watch some game film of a much more physically and emotionally mature 21 year old that has played 3 years in college already; talk to the player’s agent, discuss a pay package, quickly figuring out if the player is delusional or worth it; move on quickly if not a fit.
I know which way I would prefer.
Ross was a PG who grew to 6’7” so had to learn the wing but likely can reliably dribble…if he creates off the dribble he obtains the lofty 3 level scorer and plus defender attributesRoss isn’t close to a 2, not a speck of a 2 in his game. He’s getting better but his handle and passing isn’t there yet, and he’ll be a senior. Honestly I know everyone loves him but much like Diarra his last year, we are better if he’s our 6th man next year still, an impactful sixth man!
Wonder if Self is done.
The proof is that we are in the title game this year and we bring back all our wings plus we add Landrew. I mean how simple of an explanation can there be.Let me explain my viewpoint, it’s simple. Tell me what proof on any of Ross, Stew, Landrew or Furphy (not a wing), Ball (not a wing) we have of definite impact?? I’m waiting for the numbers. I mean I’m not being a dlck it’s a fact.
And Mullins at this point is still on the team next year. We'll see what he decide to do. Landrew is a great player. Should be a 5 star. He has the physicality and the tools to contribute right away. Stewart(senior), Ross(senior), Landrew is better than Stewart(junior), Ross(junior), Mullins.Right, Mullins. Up and down as he was, Mullins is much better than any of those four prospective returnees and was our starting 3.
I’d be very wary assuming Landrew can immediately be your guy, if Furphy possesses the athleticism for this level, or the three year refrain kd Ross and Stew “making the jump.” Literally four questions marks when there could be a plug and play starting wing out there.
didn't he announce last week he was returning?Wonder if Self is done.
We were looking at this kid last year.
It's really filling up today, on the eve of.
Yeah guess I missed that with all the tourny stuff going on.didn't he announce last week he was returning?
The problem I see with this for UConn is that the school relies on recruiting players who can endure demands for toughness, who can survive acerbic personalities like Hurley or Calhoun. So the coaches have to really seek out kids like Tristen Newton and Silas Demary, who have those traits. The emotional load on a player like Tarris is something that Hurley has discussed repeatedly for 2 straight years now.The funny thing is that many coaches like the current system much better. It is a lot less work and a lot less time and effort spent on kids who will never come to the school.
Old days: follow teenagers around for years; try to project what the kid will look like in 4 years when he is and adult; work coaches, shoe execs, family members, and the kid himself; and then lose when a slimy assistant for a Calipari or Pearl shows up with an envelope at the end.
Now: watch some game film of a much more physically and emotionally mature 21 year old that has played 3 years in college already; talk to the player’s agent, discuss a pay package, quickly figuring out if the player is delusional or worth it; move on quickly if not a fit.
I know which way I would prefer.
Well, I heard Chief was there as well, in the urinal car, and was privy to the entire conversation....so to speak.This is better than chief urinal talk