- Joined
- Sep 16, 2014
- Messages
- 683
- Reaction Score
- 3,583
Is He done with Playing in the NBA? If so Lets get the Big man back to UCONN to help with the Big's
Would be pleased to see him on KO's staff. But, there are restrictions on how many asst coaches a team can have. We are there already.Is He done with Playing in the NBA? If so Lets get the Big man back to UCONN to help with the Big's
I read somewhere last year that he was going to make his comeback toward the end of last season... at this point I think he's been out of the game too long to play in the league. Would love to see him come back to Storrs in any capacity.
Boy, you write some backwards stuff. The players that make the best coaches share a few traits. First, they are intelligent. Check. Second, the played under or coached under a great coach at some point. Check. Third, most great coaches were not super gifted and had to work hard to overcome adversity. Check. And before you have a meltdown over that last point, Emeka was talented but wasn't exactly Kevin Garnett coming out of high school.Just because someone was a successful player doesn't automatically make them a successful coach. We don't know how his skills would translate to teaching younger players. Love Emeka and want to see him involved with the program in some capacity, but we shouldn't hire him as a coach only because he played well for us and in the NBA.
Boy, you write some backwards stuff. The players that make the best coaches share a few traits. First, they are intelligent. Check. Second, the played under or coached under a great coach at some point. Check. Third, most great coaches were not super gifted and had to work hard to overcome adversity. Check. And before you have a meltdown over that last point, Emeka was talented but wasn't exactly Kevin Garnett coming out of high school.
Paesano said:Boy, you write some backwards stuff. The players that make the best coaches share a few traits. First, they are intelligent. Check. Second, the played under or coached under a great coach at some point. Check. Third, most great coaches were not super gifted and had to work hard to overcome adversity. Check. And before you have a meltdown over that last point, Emeka was talented but wasn't exactly Kevin Garnett coming out of high school.
you nailed it. Playing and coaching are different gigs.I think your post is the backwards one here. Intelligence, familiarity with great coaches, and work ethic are parts of what make up a good coach. But you're missing something huge: people skills. The smartest, hardest-working guy in the book will be a terrible coach if he can't effectively impart what he's teaching his players. Is this guy personable? Can he interact effectively with college-aged kids? Does he run drills/deliver lessons using language and tone that allow players to connect with his message and get the most out of it? Will he be able to command respect because of what he says and does as a coach, not just his status as a successful player? How is he as a motivator - does he bring intensity without being too harsh for his message to be lost?
Granted, Emeka might be the most personable teacher on the planet. But none of us (besides Chief) can confirm whether not he has what it takes to coach collegiate basketball players for sure. (aside: if someone here had him as a camp counselor at one point, I'll bite my tongue.)
You may think this is dumb new-age bunk, and that none of it mattered back in your day, but this is the reality of the basketball world today.
Just because someone was a successful player doesn't automatically make them a successful coach. We don't know how his skills would translate to teaching younger players. Love Emeka and want to see him involved with the program in some capacity, but we shouldn't hire him as a coach only because he played well for us and in the NBA.
You make some very good points, there are many aspects to being a really good coach. As a sports writer covering the team during Emeka's time at UConn I got to know him fairly well. I don't personally see him being a coach for many reasons. I don't want to look like I'm coming across negative at all (I really liked Emeka) so I won't go into details. He was a nice guy, hard worker, terrific player and teammate, and a great student. I just don't see him coaching. I don't really see him having an interest in coaching either. I could be totally wrong, but that's my take based on my observations, conversations, and relationship with him. Granted, I'm no ChiefI think your post is the backwards one here. Intelligence, familiarity with great coaches, and work ethic are parts of what make up a good coach. But you're missing something huge: people skills. The smartest, hardest-working guy in the book will be a terrible coach if he can't effectively impart what he's teaching his players. Is this guy personable? Can he interact effectively with college-aged kids? Does he run drills/deliver lessons using language and tone that allow players to connect with his message and get the most out of it? Will he be able to command respect because of what he says and does as a coach, not just his status as a successful player? How is he as a motivator - does he bring intensity without being too harsh for his message to be lost?
Granted, Emeka might be the most personable teacher on the planet. But none of us (besides Chief) can confirm whether not he has what it takes to coach collegiate basketball players for sure. (aside: if someone here had him as a camp counselor at one point, I'll bite my tongue.)
You may think this is dumb new-age bunk, and that none of it mattered back in your day, but this is the reality of the basketball world today.
Agree generally, but Emeka is a bright guy. I'm confident that he'd figure it out.Just because someone was a successful player doesn't automatically make them a successful coach. We don't know how his skills would translate to teaching younger players. Love Emeka and want to see him involved with the program in some capacity, but we shouldn't hire him as a coach only because he played well for us and in the NBA.
Agree generally, but Emeka is a bright guy. I'm confident that he'd figure it out.
We agree. I just think betting against Emeka in anything he chooses to do is a losing bet,Intelligence and personal skills don't always go hand in hand, there are a myriad of examples of that dynamic. Not to say that Emeka isn't a great, personable dude in addition to being incredibly smart. But it's really tough to just pick those skills up using one's own intelligence (I could argue that my entire childhood/adolescence was living proof of that...).
We agree. I just think betting against Emeka in anything he chooses to do is a losing bet,
Just because someone was a successful player doesn't automatically make them a successful coach. We don't know how his skills would translate to teaching younger players. Love Emeka and want to see him involved with the program in some capacity, but we shouldn't hire him as a coach only because he played well for us and in the NBA.
Did I say he did?Do you have any reason whatsoever to suspect that Emeka has any interest at all in coaching? Maybe he and Ray can be grad assistants together.
Emeka to the whitehouse in 2016
It is time.