Quite frankly Dave knew it would go public. Subject to FOI.punching the air in a good way or because he was angry?
Edit: I am somewhat surprised that email thread was leaked.
Quite frankly Dave knew it would go public. Subject to FOI.punching the air in a good way or because he was angry?
Edit: I am somewhat surprised that email thread was leaked.
I don’t agree. Since there’s no buyout there’s no upside to either retiring or being fired other than the allusion that it was on Edsall’s terms. But the first announcement was so clearly a respectful way not to fire Edsall but even in that Benedict withheld final judgement which he obviously rendered the following day. He probably needed just to get some alignment internally with Chair of board, president and chief of staffBenedict marking his territory and making it clear that he makes the decisions, not Edsall.
Now seems pretty sure that Edsall tried to preempt his firing with that unilateral retirement announcement, and DB was not having it.
Yup. The embarrassment is the BB only fans. No other alumni base treats it’s programs so disparately and with such malign intent. The truth is they know football would suck the air out of the room if successful, as it should.We are the only fanbase like this that I know of and it's pathetic. Even with the bball fans getting their wish of rejoining the NBE, they still want the FB to go away. I had a whole conversation with a good friend yesterday about how the FB program is essential to the AD. He said it was not true and the program is an embarrassment and should just be dropped. My friend is a huge FB guy too, yet he grew up with UConn bball and thinks we need to just "accept" that's what we are as a school. It's embarrassing that our own alumnus and fans can't cheer for ALL UConn teams, no matter the sport. It's even worse when your own fan base are actively stating that the football team should be scrapped.
Moorhead must have had a Flux Capacitor to have gotten to 2006 from 2009.Crazy train.
Edsall didn’t even work with Benedict on this.
Locker room issues…. Not the first time with Randy. He had an issue in the locker room in 2006 too. Moorhead saved Randy’s ass.
This is aggravating. The joke about 15 years ago was that the men’s team hated football, women’s team hates the men’s team and that football hated everyone.UConn might have the most NIMBY fans in the country. That attitude has been a significant factor in what's holding back the football program in particular.
And, university Legal and HR.He probably needed just to get some alignment internally with Chair of board, president and chief of staff
Yep - just a formality on both ends.Dave’s email was time stamped after the news was public. So assuming this is just the formal and professional cya version of the in-person exchange.
Got that right!!!I'll guess Benedict encouraged a change a QB and edsall said screw it I'm done.
Yes!!!My guess? AD said put Krajewski in and edsall said no and stuff escalated
This is aggravating. The joke about 15 years ago was that the men’s team hated football, women’s team hates the men’s team and that football hated everyone.
I gotta blame a lot of the very old media for this many many moons ago. Calhoun was always miffed how much we spent on football (stadium, practice center) and the media kind of took up that passive aggressive spirit …basketball vs. football. I can’t tell you how many times, after a loss, the old “is it basketball season?” I heard.
Then, it was men’s hoops making fun of the older people liking women’s hoops, then women’s hoops doing the “men are men, and women are champions BS”
One of the great mysteries I have as a former writer covering the team, an alum of the school and a CT resident is the hate one of the fan bases has fir the other.
The only thing all 3 fan bases agree on is Jim Penders is awesome. I am not joking on that either.
That is what it read like.And, university Legal and HR.
Nope, it's guys like you. The ones that didn't care one whit about the damage FB was doing to the programs that made D-1 FB possible.Yup. The embarrassment is the BB only fans.
I'd argue football made athletic departments possible and helped create them. Football is the sport UConn had success in first. Then soccer, then field hockey, then basketball.Nope, it's guys like you. The ones that didn't care one whit about the damage FB was doing to the programs that made D-1 FB possible.
As for football, to me, this is whistling while Storrs burns. There isn't one program in New England worth anything and yes, that surely includes BCU.I agree - never made sense.
That is just too big of an "if" and that saddens me greatly. We are a very good, flagship state U that doesn't reside close to the football belt. It's pro territory and has been forever.Yup. The embarrassment is the BB only fans. No other alumni base treats it’s programs so disparately and with such malign intent. The truth is they know football would suck the air out of the room if successful, as it should.
Excellent post but there are a couple points I'd like to make.This is aggravating. The joke about 15 years ago was that the men’s team hated football, women’s team hates the men’s team and that football hated everyone.
I gotta blame a lot of the very old media for this many many moons ago. Calhoun was always miffed how much we spent on football (stadium, practice center) and the media kind of took up that passive aggressive spirit …basketball vs. football. I can’t tell you how many times, after a loss, the old “is it basketball season?” I heard.
Then, it was men’s hoops making fun of the older people liking women’s hoops, then women’s hoops doing the “men are men, and women are champions BS”
One of the great mysteries I have as a former writer covering the team, an alum of the school and a CT resident is the hate one of the fan bases has fir the other.
The only thing all 3 fan bases agree on is Jim Penders is awesome. I am not joking on that either.
I agree, Calhoun was a football fan and a supporter of the football program. Sure, he advocated for his sport first, as any good coach would. Everyone liked Hathaway when he was Lew’s errand boy and they all supported Hathaway becoming AD because they thought they could do as they pleased. Little did anyone know, Jeff would go on a power trip once given some power. He alienated just about everyone, including Jim and Randy.It wasn't that JC was angry that football was getting donations for their practice facility/training center. His issue was that no effort was being expended to raise funds for a much needed basketball facility.
Excellent post but there are a couple points I'd like to make.
The jabs about the age of the women's team's fan base started in the mid 1990's when we were still lobbying for support to move up a level in football.
It wasn't that JC was angry that football was getting donations for their practice facility/training center. His issue was that no effort was being expended to raise funds for a much needed basketball facility. Additionally, during JH's time as athletic director, increasing payroll pretty much anywhere within the athletic department was like pulling teeth (and JH happened to continually bring his management of staffing costs as a reason for bonus payments).
That said, the overarching point (which I still am baffled by) is why so many people who should be at a minimum passively supportive of the football program are so opposed to idea of trying to compete at this level. We've had a horrible decade and people have been coming out of the woodwork for a few years now stumping to have football drop down to FCS. Even when we were at our best 11-14 years ago, they were publicly belittling what was being accomplished. I can't think of any other school that has to deal with anything close to this.
Around the time that Kansas State had completed 100 years of football (Snyder was in his first run as HC) they had more winless seasons than they had winning seasons (each was around 15). Memphis (as Memphis St early on) had a thirty year run, beginning in the mid 1970's where they had four winning seasons. Over the last 25 years of that same time frame Temple and Rutgers performances weren't much better than Memphis. This past decade of UConn football doesn't scratch the surface of what other programs have endured but we have people everywhere arguing that we need to give up football at this level. I would love to know why this stance is so important to them.
A part of me wants to believe that if Endres was a hoops player, JC would've found a way to overlook the toking up. I'm probably wrong on that, but I just have this feeling.Randy had a big presser back in the day I think comparing Tyler or Zach, not sure, to Taliek Brown how Jim stood by him and he was such a winner and won games ugly and the media didn't know what we were talking about (Endres was best pure QB) etc.
5 minutes before the presser Jim was in the elevator and said..."That guy Cody is by far the best QB."
I can only tell you that I know plenty of UConn alum and basketball fans who don't understand why we're still playing football. Those folks are definitely out there.I strongly feel this is a mostly a small biased sample size thing. If you get beyond a small % of BY MBB hardos, I think that the vast majority of UConn MBB fans want football to succeed and also understand that the team needs to for us to be a viable overall athletic department.
Every single one of my friends are strong UConn ATHLETICS fans. Every single one. Talking dozens. Maybe I've just found the right subgroup to hang with, but I think it's more like a reasonable representative sample of the average UConn athletics fan.
It's a fun narrative to peddle, but I really don't think it's that true.