- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 450
- Reaction Score
- 4,335
Headline writer(s) took some liberties. This is the original USA Today article. BTW, Danny U gets FOUR PARAGRAPHS!!!!In the end the headline points in the wrong direction. It wasn't that UConn wasn't for Elena simply its location. Instead she had to be true to herself and her sister. A better header would have been "How I Gave Up Someone's Dream to Find My Own." She will be an awesome Special Ed professional.
I agree... its the basketball side of things, championships dont mean anything etc. If thats the case you can easily get a membership to the local Y to shoot some hoops.I think most of the people who are still bitter about the situation, are not bitter because she chose her family over UCONN (I mean how can you be? - though there might be a couple..) but more the way she went about it. Or the way it went down.
Everything is relative. Basketball is great but family is family, at 17 she was living other folks dream for her, not her own. She mows enjoys basketball again that she has found away to fulfill both joys in her life.I agree... its the basketball side of things, championships dont mean anything etc. If thats the case you can easily get a membership to the local Y to shoot some hoops.
I'd venture to say that almost all of EDD's critics would now retract the "harsh" comments, have completely changed their attitude, and even learned something about what is important in life and basketball's place in it.BTW, the for the writer the reaction of some in the "UConn fan base was harsh", maybe even most for a time but here at the Boneyard there was always a group of fans, a significant group, who supported Elena's decision. The is no fan base per se just individual fans some who handled the decision with negative responses and, also, other fans who saw beyond the loss to UConn to the bigger picture of one gifted 17 year olds difficult decision and commitment to her sister.
Well I doubt most have learned anything about what is important. Most people already realize that. And those that don't aren't gonna be swayed by EDD's story. What many have learned (and even EDD) is why she left. At the time it wasn't presented as "for her family".I'd venture to say that almost all of EDD's critics would now retract the "harsh" comments, have completely changed their attitude, and even learned something about what is important in life and basketball's place in it.
I disagree, the relationship with Lizzie was discussed from the very start as one of contributing pressures. It was not couched in the terms of the importance of touch being the sole or key way to communicate between the two of them and the obstacle that even the distance to UConn created for that.Well I doubt most have learned anything about what is important. Most people already realize that. And those that don't aren't gonna be swayed by EDD's story. What many have learned (and even EDD) is why she left. At the time it wasn't presented as "for her family".
It was presented as burnout.I disagree, the relationship with Lizzie was discussed from the very start as one of contributing pressures. It was not couched in the terms of the importance of touch being the sole or key way to communicate between the two of them and the obstacle that even the distance to UConn created for that.
I disagree, the relationship with Lizzie was discussed from the very start as one of contributing pressures. It was not couched in the terms of the importance of touch being the sole or key way to communicate between the two of them and the obstacle that even the distance to UConn created for that.
That was one of a multitude of presentations and was her self appraisal but the wider discussion included homesickness and the desire to be near her sister.It was presented as burnout.
Discussed by people in the BY. yes. Discussed by the Delle Donnes, NO.
That was one of my major beefs with the whole BY reaction at the time. Lots of people were declaring that "Oh, It's because of her sister. It's all about that." Such folks were making assumptions that certainly had not been confirmed by anyone in a position to make a confirmation. But, it was a pleasant out, and easy to accept -- regardless of whether it was true or not.
But, that was only one possible explanation -- and not the one Elena herself offered. Yet some people absolutely insisted that they knew that was what it was all about. And that irritated me, for one. It is nice that this pleasant explanation has indeed been confirmed by someone who really knows the facts.
Meanwhile, folks gave Kalana grief for making an honest, upfront comment!!! KG didn't deserve that, and she wouldn't have been open to it if Elena had not been so unclear about what was really going on.
I doubt very many BYers ever thought Elena "owed" anything to UConn or the BY, though many were disappointed at not being able to see her play (and STILL are) and were rightly unhappy that UConn perhaps missed other recruit(s) because of the misdirection of the phantom EDD commitment.
maybe the "in crowd" knew the truth all along and even knew she was leaving in the middle of the nightWell I doubt most have learned anything about what is important. Most people already realize that. And those that don't aren't gonna be swayed by EDD's story. What many have learned (and even EDD) is why she left. At the time it wasn't presented as "for her family".
I would not characterize my criticism about her leaving as harsh. I have always felt that it was her life and her decision to make. I was very critical of how she chose to leave, skulking off in the middle of the night. At the time I thought it was a cowardly and disrespectful act and I haven't changed my mind about that.
thats what I say about those who call ANY player (Diggins) names... and hurl insults at their family membersBully for you.
Here's what I think...hiding behind a pseud and hurling insults at a 17 year old is more than cowardly…BTW, you were there when she left?
At least in a newspaper, if you editorialize, you have step up and be identified. Here at The Boneyard you can hide in the bushes and lob grenades at a teenager(s) & very young adults.
Yep, pretty much what I was saying....but Paco with more detail.Discussed by people in the BY. yes. Discussed by the Delle Donnes, NO.
That was one of my major beefs with the whole BY reaction at the time. Lots of people were declaring that "Oh, It's because of her sister. It's all about that." Such folks were making assumptions that certainly had not been confirmed by anyone in a position to make a confirmation. But, it was a pleasant out, and easy to accept -- regardless of whether it was true or not.
But, that was only one possible explanation -- and not the one Elena herself offered. Yet some people absolutely insisted that they knew that was what it was all about. And that irritated me, for one. It is nice that this pleasant explanation has indeed been confirmed by someone who really knows the facts.
Meanwhile, folks gave Kalana grief for making an honest, upfront comment!!! KG didn't deserve that, and she wouldn't have been open to it if Elena had not been so unclear about what was really going on.
I doubt very many BYers ever thought Elena "owed" anything to UConn or the BY, though many were disappointed at not being able to see her play (and STILL are) and were rightly unhappy that UConn perhaps missed other recruit(s) because of the misdirection of the phantom EDD commitment.