The lower Bowl was basically full. Great job students! If the turnstile count was 15,657 then many fans were not scanned properly. This article has the wrong number from the number of fans that were there. This was the largest crowd in years. Many wore Orange on their side of the field but when we scored it was loud. People are ready to go and I hope we can keep some of our best threats on offense healthy for the second half of the season.The article says the turnstile count at Syracuse was 15,657. The box score on the AD website shows 25,114.
$68 million to play at a stadium closer to CCSU? Might as well just put down $300 million for an on-campus place. Playing in EH has never made sense and never will.
The lower Bowl was basically full. Great job students! If the turnstile count was 15,657 then many fans were not scanned properly. This article has the wrong number from the number of fans that were there. This was the largest crowd in years. Many wore Orange on their side of the field but when we scored it was loud. People are ready to go and I hope we can keep some of our best threats on offense healthy for the second half of the season.
No excuse for UCONN to not have an on-campus stadium if it is serious about football.
The stadium does its job. You sit your butt in the seat and watch a game on a field. There is no need to spend that kind of money. Fix basic structural items to manage its life and let it be. The media infrastructure costs and other keep up with Jones expenses are an absolute joke. Until this program produces. They need to sit tight.
Three hours? That gets you the last four miles of the trip to State College on game day.Unfortunately, we don’t have the football mindset of many places where people drive 3 hours to attend games in places like State College.
The stadium does its job. You sit your butt in the seat and watch a game on a field. There is no need to spend that kind of money. Fix basic structural items to manage its life and let it be. The media infrastructure costs and other keep up with Jones expenses are an absolute joke. Until this program produces. They need to sit tight.
how about abandoning the POS and going back to Storrs where UConn athletics actually belongsAlright you dum dums who are against this; what should we do? Wait 20 more years so that it costs $120M?
how about abandoning the POS and going back to Storrs where UConn athletics actually belongs
Thank you. In case you weren’t aware, we are one of the worst programs in FBS, have an average actual attendance of 15k per game for 6 times a year, and no major conference membership in the face of ongoing power conference consolidation. An idiot invests 70 Million in upgrades. You do basic maintenance and see what the future holds. As long as the core infrastructure elements are in good condition, it is possible to expand and invest in luxuries when a power conference comes calling. But, I guess that just moronic.Dumbest post of the year. Congrats.
Alright you dum dums who are against this; what should we do? Wait 20 more years so that it costs $120M?
I never put a $200 million cap on it. What's lame is students having to take a bus or drive far off campus. Campus culture needs a football stadium, I'm not really concerned with the state's ideas or how likely it is to happen. There's nothing dumber than investing in a stadium that exists to accommodate a bunch of Avon dads over the students who pay obnoxiously more than most other state schools.That’s a brilliant take.
Do you have any idea how lame an on campus stadium would be with anything less than $200M?
Of course you don’t. Because if you did you wouldn’t make such a stupid comment.
When someone can show that the state has the appetite to spend something like that on an on campus stadium and spend what it takes to maintain it and keep it up to date then let me know.
Nobody is arguing against routine maintenance for cleanliness, safety or stadium longevity, but this specifically mentions "keeping up with the rest of Division 1 stadiums" which implies a bunch of non-football nonsense. It's not like people in this state are deciding between going to the Rent on Saturday or going to a game in another state with a better stadium.
The "keeping up with the rest of D1" money would be better spent on the coaching staff because the only thing that will turn attendance around is winning games.
The Mansfield residents once were opposed to the downtown Storrs development, Now, they are all going there to shop and eat. If they put the stadium near the research industrial park, traffic can come and go via Route 44. It is only six times a year.For those of you too young to know why UConn ended up at the Rent in East Hartford, this is a good history of it.:
I recall Mansfield year-round residents hated the ideal of the stadium and opposed it at the legislature. Traffic. Weekend crowds. Rt 195 would have needed a big upgrade to support the traffic.Hartford, Connecticut Breaking News, Sports & Entertainment - Hartford Courant
Hartford Courant: Your source for Connecticut breaking news, UConn sports, business, entertainment, weather and trafficwww.courant.com
The Rent location was hard to oppose. It got us into The Big East. Yes, we wanted it on campus. But East Hartford was better than nothing.
Not attacking anyone here but love the football field where it is. Further explanation below.(The Rent is a great place to see a game without a bad seat in the house and the tailgating is tremendous. I love the place. I would just love it more if it were located on campus.)
What make's it a dump? The grounds and stadium are clean as are the rest rooms. What makes a sporting location that one only spends a half a day such an eyesore???. It’s a dump. Not a bad place to watch a game but it’s a complete eyesore that lacks sooo much.
No attack @Kolumbo but it is not always distance. First one has to find a place on campus to locate a stadium. Then find acreage for parking. Again a state road study to possibly get the amount of cars and parking needed.Here we go again. I really wish they would just build on campus. And why are nutmeggers the only college fans in the country concerned about distance to the campus.
Yes, just like pretty much every public asset that doesnt have a legit business model. Revenues here never been close to paying for things and so maintenance was sacrificed. Completely predictable.Of course I suspect they have not spent money on regular maintenance as they should have. Part of this is the setup. The owner is one state agency, the operator is a different one who subs out part of the management to a private corporation ( private sector blah blah blah, it means you pay retail for everything) and maintenance is the prerogative of yet another agency. Plus it is 20 years old so likely there are systems that are in need of replacement and repair. Oh, and nobody involved in the operation has the authority to borrow to pay for upgrades. It is guaranteed to be a mess…
If I was the Governor Storrs would be a neo-city of 100kIf I was the Governor I would commission a study for an on campus stadium and push for the land to set aside accordingly - preserved for the future! Maybe the stadium is on campus or maybe its immediately adjacent or a mile down the road - which ever site is best. At the Rent I would do the renovations to extend the life of the facilities another 15 years. I would publicly state that the goal should be to build an on campus stadium on a timeline to replace the Rent by year 15 from today. Its a goal. As time might prove - it may not be feasible or wise - we shall see.