- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 20,210
- Reaction Score
- 115,896
I'd agree about the recency bias. UConn hasn't been very good the last few years and that takes away some of the luster of the years before it. It was only 6 years ago when Bilas said, "The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites. But over the past 20 years whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn." So if UConn gets back to being elite they'll be in that conversation again.I agree with you, but the majority of national media sentiment of college basketball is generally very Johnny come lately. Gonzaga and Nova probably wouldn’t have made that list 5 years ago. Announcers/analysts in college ball suffer from a lot of recency bias, and the rhetoric around it is cyclical - that’s moreso my comment, I don’t put much stock in what they say because it changes so frequently