Again, this is off base. A guy who worked hard in the post in college to get his 10 and 8 would be likely to experience a bigger drop off in the league than a guy who got it 'athletically'
I have to agree.
Again, this is off base. A guy who worked hard in the post in college to get his 10 and 8 would be likely to experience a bigger drop off in the league than a guy who got it 'athletically'
what does dwight howard do besides dunk, block shots and rebound? and he held a whole franchise hostage!Like I posted before, DeAndre Jordan still does NOTHING besides catch alley oops and block shots and he just got a second contract offer of 4/43 that was instantly matched by the clips
As a fan, its easy to say that Drummond should stay for many obvious reasons. But if I am Andre Drummond, I would never pass on an opportunity to set myself up for life. Right now, Drummond most likely gets picked 2nd on potential alone. He is 6"11 and a freak athelete. The NBA gives kids like that a very long leash. Worst case scenario, if Drummond never develops at the next level, he will still have a 5-6 year career and earn upwards of $30+ million. Until midseason this year, Kwame Brown was still in the NBA. Bottomline, if you go through the history of the NBA draft and do a case study on how many projected top 3 picks went back to college for an additional year, it would quickly become a cautionary tale of money lossed vs skills developed. All you ahve to do is look back to last year and see how far Sullinger will drop and most likely Harrison Barnes as well.
Let's compare stats:Marcus Camby never became much of an offensive threat. What's he on, his 4th contract?
IF Andre Drummond is going to get better, which is the entire reason to draft him, then it stands to reason that he will be a higher pick next year vs. this year. Draft will be weaker, he will be better.
It's pretty obvious he's a lottery pick, maybe even number 1. ."
ESPN has him 6th, and I don't think this has been updated since NCAAs as his stock is shown rising whereas after UConn's postseason its most likely neutral or descending.
That's easy to say when you are gambling with someone elses' career.It's pretty obvious he's a lottery pick, maybe even number 1. However, another year of college won't change his draft spot.
It's easy to say it, PERIOD.That's easy to say when you are gambling with someone elses' career.
It's easy to say it, PERIOD.
Wake up.
You're an odd mix of solid, well-informed posts, and crap that should be stuck under the tables at Waffle House.
Barring injury, which is a "DUH," the kid is not going lower next year relative to this year, which is a top heavy draft.
Irving went after his freshman year. Regardless, AD is an unusual talent and a top five draft pick. He should think very carefully about jeopardizing that even if the chances are remote.I would change that to "barring serious, career ending injury." Look at Kyrie Irving.
The dilemna for Andre is that if he stays at UConn, but doesn't show much improvement, he'll be penalized.
This is getting old and I'm beating a dead horse. Drummond was argued as #1 or 2 coming into this year and now he's #5+. That is descending versus the competition. He has 1-3 plays per game that make you say wow, but then disappears, bricks free throws (29.5%!) and shoots jump shots from his chin. Like any prospect he has a range of NBA comps projection but his is particularly wide. Best case poor man's Dwight Howard, worst case DeAndre Jordan probable I'd agree with whoever suggested Camby as a pretty good comp.Did you see that block against ISU where he met Royce coming in for the jam full steam? He stopped that big load dead in his tracks, the ball didn't budge once he met it. How many others in the draft can do that? He ain't descending.
I've always wondered why people think players would develop more/better if they stayed in college. In college, he has a limited amount of time in the gym, limited access to coaches, limited practice time with a team and most important, he's practicing against college players. If he goes pro, he's got about 100 times as many practices in a year. He's got unlimited access to coaches and training time. He doesn't have an obligation to be taking care of classes. And he gets to go against pro players. Why do you think kids like Oak played so much better after a few weeks of big man camp against the best and taught by the best? As a pro, that's not a two week camp - it's a 365 day camp.
If he has the potential, it will be brought out faster if he goes pro. He needs another year of college is ridiculous. Do I want to see him stay for another year? Hell yes, but that's only because I'm selfish fan. I am not for a second thinking what is best for the kid.
That is a good point. Lamb and KEA are 2 names that hurt their draft position by staying another year.
This is getting old and I'm beating a dead horse. Drummond was argued as #1 or 2 coming into this year and now he's #5+. That is descending versus the competition.