- Joined
- Mar 16, 2018
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction Score
- 2,397
If Coach K "sucks" then no one doesn't.
I was going to say I was proud that you put this on the board and then got the board whipped up and walked away from it. The fact that you're trying to defend a take asking if a top 5 coach ever in CBB sucks, and you have people agreeing with you is just silly.
Sort of agree with your post, Coach K has indeed built a great program, but John Wooden had roughly the same degree of talent as Coach K has recruited at Duke. Wooden was though a vastly superior game coach, X's and O's guy, call it what you will. His 10 National Championships prove that. They didn't call him the Wizard of Westwood for nothing. Always wondered what he had written down on those neatly rolled up pieces of paper in his hand.I think you are defining the role of the coach far too narrowly. Let's see what the job entails in the eyes of an AD or University President.
I'd be hard pressed to find anybody who has done a better job at it than that.
- Build a program that enhances the attractiveness and image of the university
- Win games consistently to bring in fans/ticket $, sponsors, TV and branding money
- Recruit strong student athletes who lead to success on the court and present a positive image off the court
- Get to the post season and win games in the tournament
- Put the team in position to challenge for championships
That's not really a cogent position, it's just criticism of the me.
But objectively speaking, it is absolutely a fair question to ask if Pete Gillen or even Dom Perno could have won five national championships with three future NBA first rounders every year for 25 years.
You really believe that question is unfair?
You're not going to like this then.I can’t wait for the day that either Coach K or Dookie Vitale retires. It is impossible to listen to Vitale do a game because it is a total infomercial for Duke.
That's not really a cogent position, it's just criticism of the me.
But objectively speaking, it is absolutely a fair question to ask if Pete Gillen or even Dom Perno could have won five national championships with three future NBA first rounders every year for 25 years.
You really believe that question is unfair?
You can't go back and forth with me because your position is very weak. Calling me a troll because I argue that K is an underachiever (and perhaps even sucks) isn't a legitimate position. K's entire career supports my position. You, or a piece of wood, could have gotten Duke to one out of the last nine Final Fours.I'm not going to go back and forth with you on why this take is silly that is a waste of time. However, I will continue criticism your obvious trolling that seems to work on an ever increasing amount of posters.
The problem with looking at the seed vs results ranking is that a one seed has to win 4 games or they under achieved while an 8 seed wins two and they over achieved. And when it comes to seeding Duke in bb is much like Notre Dame in fb - often over rated.
I think Coach K does a very creditable job at integrating new players into his system. I am not convinced he is great at making in game adjustments.
I can’t wait for the day that either Coach K or Dookie Vitale retires. It is impossible to listen to Vitale do a game because it is a total infomercial for Duke.
You're gaslighting. It's amazing anyone would take any time to argue with you over something so incredibly stupid.You can't go back and forth with me because your position is very weak. Calling me a troll because I argue that K is an underachiever (and perhaps even sucks) isn't a legitimate position. K's entire career supports my position. You, or a piece of wood, could have gotten Duke to one out of the last nine Final Fours.
At best Coach K is an underachiever.