- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 6,077
- Reaction Score
- 27,329
The economic argument does not hold water. Let's say playing in the New Big East would attract 3k more fans per game for 7 games at $30 per ticket. That adds up to a ~$630k per year increase in ticket sales. I would argue that you could sell the same amount of tickets just by having a winning team. The difference in the TV contracts between the NBE and AAC is marginal right now and I think the new AAC contract should be higher than what the NBE is making now. NCAA credits favor the NBE right now, but I think the AAC can deliver comparable revenues in the future. This year, the AAC has more Top 25 teams (3) than the NBE (2).Since I'm only trying to look at this from an economical standpoint, the most money that the athletic department can likely generate would be going independent for football and trying to schedule the likes of Alabama, OSU, Auburn, Clemson, etc., and securing the basketball teams in a more logical geographic conference that has more natural and existing rivalries (Providence, St. John's, Villanova). The change for basketball would almost immediately see an increase in ticket revenues from the last two seasons, because let's face it, no one wants to watch this team play ECU on a Wednesday night. I'll be honest, I don't know the TV contract dollars in the American versus the new Big East.
The biggest economic impact would be the potential to get a P5 bid which would lead to much higher revenues. Joining the NBE would take the P5 opportunity off the table.
