- Joined
- Jun 26, 2013
- Messages
- 485
- Reaction Score
- 1,604
So, with a lot of the recent articles coming out (and more specifically the pass rush school one), I got a bit more curious about what we may see come Friday and through the season. We all know that it's going to be a multiple 3-4. How much we are in 4 down vs. 3 is yet to be known, but the fact that they've moved as many players from DE to LB/OLB I'm of the belief we'll see more 3-4 than the 50/50 split we've been told here or there. So, with that being said, I wanted to look a bit more into it and did some drill down to find articles in regards to the ND defense, our most recent Diaco sample. Feel free to peruse below.
Key take-aways paraphrased/augmented:
"The Bob Diaco Irish defense used a classic 3-4 scheme with a bend-don't-break mentality. The 2012 Irish D encapsulated what the approach should look like. The team relied mostly on its front seven to make plays while the defensive backs concentrated on staying in front of the ball...The front worked with two-gap principles and some hybrid fronts that would allow players to attack a single gap, rather than controlling blockers.... Meanwhile, with solid tacklers at safety able to play in deep alignments, teams were unable to land very many explosive plays, certainly not enough to offset the negative plays inflicted by a dominant front seven."
"Diaco's defenses didn't attack. They relied on limiting big plays and forcing an offense to beat you with a 10- or 12-play drive. "
The quintessential two readings you should go through are these:
1. Diaco's "no crease" defense encapsulated
http://www.onefootdown.com/2012/8/25/3267286/bob-diacos-3-4-no-crease-defense
2. A 3-4 defense primer, with a few ND defense topics interjected in the mix
http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2012/08/22/notre-dame-3-4-defense-primer/
Here's a video of all of the sacks in 2012 for the ND defense (put it on mute, it has a pretty annoying soundtrack if you're not a ND fan being exhilarated by the highlights). I kept an eye on the lineups and formations they'd be in pre-snap and immediately after. It appears as though there's a lot of zone usage and less man to man, so I'll be curious what we end up seeing:
I can't wait for Friday.
Key take-aways paraphrased/augmented:
"The Bob Diaco Irish defense used a classic 3-4 scheme with a bend-don't-break mentality. The 2012 Irish D encapsulated what the approach should look like. The team relied mostly on its front seven to make plays while the defensive backs concentrated on staying in front of the ball...The front worked with two-gap principles and some hybrid fronts that would allow players to attack a single gap, rather than controlling blockers.... Meanwhile, with solid tacklers at safety able to play in deep alignments, teams were unable to land very many explosive plays, certainly not enough to offset the negative plays inflicted by a dominant front seven."
"Diaco's defenses didn't attack. They relied on limiting big plays and forcing an offense to beat you with a 10- or 12-play drive. "
The quintessential two readings you should go through are these:
1. Diaco's "no crease" defense encapsulated
http://www.onefootdown.com/2012/8/25/3267286/bob-diacos-3-4-no-crease-defense
2. A 3-4 defense primer, with a few ND defense topics interjected in the mix
http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2012/08/22/notre-dame-3-4-defense-primer/
Here's a video of all of the sacks in 2012 for the ND defense (put it on mute, it has a pretty annoying soundtrack if you're not a ND fan being exhilarated by the highlights). I kept an eye on the lineups and formations they'd be in pre-snap and immediately after. It appears as though there's a lot of zone usage and less man to man, so I'll be curious what we end up seeing:
I can't wait for Friday.