I'm not worried about 4 or 5 star recruits. Many teams across the country have done very well with 2 and 3 star recruits, so in my opinion highly rated recruits isn't needed for this program. Remember Dwayne Difton? If memory serves me correctly he was a 4 star WR from Florida. He caught what like 3 passes in his career at UConn? What is needed is exactly what Diaco said. Players that will fit his system and want to be here.
I'm not worried about 4 or 5 star recruits. Many teams across the country have done very well with 2 and 3 star recruits, so in my opinion highly rated recruits isn't needed for this program. Remember Dwayne Difton? If memory serves me correctly he was a 4 star WR from Florida. He caught what like 3 passes in his career at UConn? What is needed is exactly what Diaco said. Players that will fit his system and want to be here.
Have we EVER gotten 4 or 5 star recruits? Difton lasted a season. Amazingly Todman was 3 star. Nothing new here. Since 2009 we have not had very much luck keeping classes together, often losing 50%. Get kids who you can coach and develop for 5 years. We have not done that consistently.The way Diaco speaks reminds me of Calhoun. There are like 8 different thoughts they are trying to convey in each sentence. Let's hope he's as successful.
Here's the bad news about recruiting. We are not getting 4 and 5 star recruits.
Here's the good news. We don't need 4 and 5 star recruits to be successful.
I love what Coach Diaco has done for UConn's program thus far and I will admit that he has forgotten more about football than I would know in 1,000 lifetimes, but he is putting the traditional 2nd tier spin on recruiting here.
Included in the top 50 prospects for the 2014 NFL Draft, 8 were 5* recruits. That doesn't seem like much, but now re-do the math given that only about 30 players are generally rated 5 stars on an annual basis. Just under half (23) of the top 50 prospects were 4 star recruits. That leaves 19 of 50 spots to be split over 3* (16), 2*(3), 1* (0) and NR (0) recruits.
50 prospects accounts for just over a round and a half of NFL prospects. Granted that these were not necessarily the 1st 50 picks and it is also not to say that NR-3* recruits can't make it in the NFL, but it seems they are being picked later in the draft and the numbers suggest that they are at a disadvantage from the get go.
That said, UConn has had good success placing both skilled players and big Uglies in the NFL, and given that 85% of all high school recruits are anything but a 4 or 5 star recruit, the vast majority of teams not based in Tuscaloosa, Baton Rouge, Athens, South Central Los Angeles, Austin, Ann Arbor, and South Bend are comprised of such a player.
Two undeniable facts remain (at least to me):
1) These services are mostly paid sites and cater to their customers.
2) No site or handful thereof can rank over 2,500 high school recruits. Given 1), there is bound to be a chicken-or-egg effect (the proverbial question of whether Bama recruits 5* athletes, or if an athlete is 5* because he tweeted notice of a phone call from the Tide's special teams' quality control intern.).
not for nothing, i was looking at BC and Cuse recruiting for this year, and it seems like they are saying the samething we are... they aren't pulling in the 4 and 5 star guys either, even with P5 so-called recruiting advantage .. they just have more commits to date then us.. i think we are on the right track, and still be able to compete with them.
No! No one needs seven stars! That's too many!Jerry27 said:I see where you're going, but what if someone comes out with a 7 *?
not for nothing, i was looking at BC and Cuse recruiting for this year, and it seems like they are saying the samething we are... they aren't pulling in the 4 and 5 star guys either, even with P5 so-called recruiting advantage .. they just have more commits to date then us.. i think we are on the right track, and still be able to compete with them.
I have to disagree with you "DOZE860". Syracuse has been recruiting ALOT better since joining the ACC. Last year they had 1 4* player (KJ Williams) and a whole lot of ranked 3* players. This year according to 247sports Syracuse has 2 potential 4* players (Strickland and Kelly). BC has Palazzo who according to rivals is a 4* recruit with a few ranked 3* players. If we (Uconn) were in a p5 conference, we too would be recruiting a lot better.
i don't know about all of that but check this link...I have to disagree with you "DOZE860". Syracuse has been recruiting ALOT better since joining the ACC. Last year they had 1 4* player (KJ Williams) and a whole lot of ranked 3* players. This year according to 247sports Syracuse has 2 potential 4* players (Strickland and Kelly). BC has Palazzo who according to rivals is a 4* recruit with a few ranked 3* players. If we (Uconn) were in a p5 conference, we too would be recruiting a lot better.
.but really it just seems like they are going after under the radar players, and trying to coach them up, like our staff is.