What's our record without the early turnovers? Definitely better than 1-3.
Jmoney...we are 3 & 1 without the early TO's.
A team can put players, especially young ones in a position to win....another thing getting over the hump.....we will get through it...
..hang onto your jocks boys-this is going to be a freakin great ride and not all of it smooth. This is not for the faint of heart. Maybe, just maybe...some of the people who leave early or can't get into a game on time need to grow a pair or trade in their block C blue hats for a freakin pink hat!!!
Maybe, just maybe IMHO.... it's time some of those that frequent our midst out there question their own very heart and soul and not whether a coach wants to win as was expressed in another thread...please spare me . This football program was taken DOWN right under a lot of noses and most of the UCONN fandom didn't see it. To a few of you on the BY to your credit, you saw it 3 years ago as did the guys in our group..... If you don't watch and enjoy the ride with these very young Husky pups, you will miss the ride back because it's only going to happen once. We finally have a coach with the testicular fortitude to get us there, again and make us great-again!. (Hear that Hathaway). Maybe, some of the UCONN pink hats need to examine their own DNA....Multiple mens BB championships, #1 womens BB program in the world, a state that sits in between NY and Boston with the Bruins, Patriots, Giants, Red Sox and Yankees. We abound and sit in and amongst greatness and very successful teams. not all can be smooth all the time...even Friday's ugly debacle but with the ugly comes the awesome.
You are 2 players away on the OL from being 3 & 1 with a team that has a majority of players that haven't had to shave yet...
You are 2 early turnovers from being 3 & 1....
Enjoy the ride...see you at Temple.
The amazing thing is that you said that with the intent of insulting Diaco and many of the lunatics on this board will read it as an insult.
Yikes. 4 games and you have him all figured out, huh? #rushtojudgementPasqualoni was incompetent and outdated. diaco is arrogant and....ignorant? stubborn? incompetent?
It's not crazy. If the strategy that leads to a 28-0 loss gives you a better chance to win than the strategy that dooms you to a close loss than it's a better strategy.
Maybe some people understand blackjack. You can stand on 16 against a face card and lose a lot of close hands. It doesn't give you the best chance of winning even if a good amount of the time you hit something that busts you.
USF's punter and kick coverage constantly kept us pinned back. Their punt returners caught everything they were supposed to catch and their FG kicker made his one attempt. This more than anything else is what stopped HCBD's strategy from working.
If we are building for next year can we start playing next year's QB? When will Boyle be named the starter? Why not do it now?
I understand rewarding Chandler for coming back but he can read the writing on the wall and he said in the pre-season press conference that he was content to be the back-up.
Let's put Boyle under center, give him max protection, run the ball a lot, go to shotgun on third down, tell him to throw the ball out of bounds if someone breaks through the line, and lets see what happens. Maybe something sparks the way it did with Casey last year. There is no reason to wait any longer.
Losing will be easier to stomach if we are developing next year's QB.
News flash!!!!we're rebuilding,enjoy the ride up currently we are feeding on the bottom
I get this sentiment. I think what is frustrating (and I don't blame this on Diaco) is that I just didn't think that it would get this bad. There was more promise in 2003 when we opened the Rent than there is right now, even ignoring the conference affiliation issue. This isn't rebuilding, it is starting over.
What's our record if we were allowed to use the 1985 Chicago Bears? Definitely better than 1-3.What's our record without the early turnovers? Definitely better than 1-3.
What's our record if we were allowed to use the 1985 Chicago Bears? Definitely better than 1-3.