- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 968
- Reaction Score
- 2,249
Did anyone notice when Morrow and Lopez got into snd Lopez told her go you know what and Morrow on just one instance bumped Edwards going down court. Message don’t piss Edwards off
I think the Big easy poty award comes down to how the stars play in the uconn villanova gameI know that DePaul is not a top tier team, however a lot of positives from the game. In my mind, AE laid claim to Big East player of the year award. The 3 that came in off the bench all contributed in their own way. Nika had an off game but didn't seem to hurt the Huskies all that much. Aubrey did Aubrey kind of things, things that other players just can't replicate. Dorka was solid as always and Lou is Lou.
I would say she's becoming a version of Tina Charles. Tina didn't do the outside shooting until she became a pro.Edwards has become UConn's version of Naz Hillman but with a better outside shot........by the time she graduates she's going to be WNBA ready
Aubrey reminds me of Andre Jackson on the men's side.All-American Aaliyah Edwards was dominant tonight. Physically tough, high energy, almost Maya-like. Best player on the floor, which is becoming a regular thing.
Lou shot 50% from the arc and just about 50% overall--as usual.
Dorka scored, rebounded, and blocked shots. One board short of a double-double.
Aubrey ran by people. She gets to the basket so easily. She has a unique glide mode. Double-double.
Nika had double-figures in assists again, still leading the nation by a wide margin.
All THREE of the bench player contributed. Amari looks lax at time, but she makes some nice plays and can score. Yanna looked rested and less rushed. She ran down an DePaul player and caused a missed layup--a block or intimidation by the sound of a locomotive? Ines is looking more comfortable and scored back-to-back baskets.
I hope Jana had fun. This is a great group to be part of.
Aneesah Morrow is a wonderful BB player and I wish we had her on our team.
The way this season is going, Dorka would have returned for one more rebounded & sprained her ankle! Can't blame Geno for being overly cautious.Another fun game to watch. Wanted Dorka to come back in for one more rebound. Of course I was rooting for Nika to get 2 more rebounds to get a double double without even scoring a point (of course I really wanted her to score!). I'm really loving this group!
DePaul has superstar-itis. The team keeps waiting for Morrow, or Darrione Rogers, to bail them out and when Morrow is bottled up, they don’t know what to do.I'm still surprised people think Morrow is UConn caliber. She forces one bad shot after another and displays questionable body language. I don't find her to be a team player.
Beyond that, she's shooting about 35% the last month and a half.
Granted that's the way she is now. If she played for GENO , she would not do what she has to do because of the team she is on now. GENO would corral her excesses and make her more team orientated. I guess I was addressing her rebounding ability which UCONN has finally attained this year. GENO would make her a complete player in the UCONN style. GO HUSKIES!!!I'm still surprised people think Morrow is UConn caliber. She forces one bad shot after another and displays questionable body language. I don't find her to be a team player.
Beyond that, she's shooting about 35% the last month and a half.
Smackdown from start to finish. Couldn't be more happy with how the team played.
And OMG welcome Jana!
- Aaliyah and Aubrey with double-doubles. And Liya outplayed Morrow by a lot. AA!!!
- Lou - the only player who hit a 3-pointer. LOVE LOVE LOVE her.
- Dorka 1 board away from a double-double
- Nika back to her double digit assists (had 4 TO's sin Q1 but cleaned it up nicely by the end of the game)
- This is the kind of game i'd like to see from Aubrey every time out. She CAN play great defense AND score. She is SPECIAL!
- Who was that new kid? Ayanna Patterson - we missed you!! What a nice up and under!
- Some solid play by DeBerry and Bettencourt
Hope this team brings a lot of what we saw to Knoxville for a Thursday night smackdown...!!!
Sorry if people don’t like it. He seems like a great guy, but his program is rarely relevant nationally, usually plays a style that good programs have little problem handling and he doesn’t seem to adapt. His camp might be top notch and do a lot for kids. I’m all for it. It has zero to with coaching competitive D1 hoops I don’t judge if it’s better or worse that a lot of schools don’t demand as much of the ladies’ teams as they do the men, but I guarantee you that DePaul gives Bruno more leeway than it does the men coaches. Arguably the men’s coaches generally face tougher competition overall. UConn men’s fans grumble about Hurley because they have lost early in the NCAA pointing to it as not acceptable. And the administration looks at such things. Bruno’s DePaul makes some NCAAs, they are not close to being a threat to ever win it. I made a simple statement. He is overrated compared to coaches at other programs and is never on the chopping block . Maybe that’s a better way for college sports, it also a fact. Harry Peretta was a legend who was given miles more rope than they would give any Villanova men’s team coach. If you want to have a serious discussion about how “big time” programs have different expectations for female hoops from male (changing at some schools) let‘s do it. A “dislike” is a cop out, which I appreciate you didn’t do. I never use the thumb’s down.You obviously don’t live in Chicago. His camps are legendary and he habitually schedules the second toughest schedule in the nation. If you ever saw the campus that he has to work with, you would never ever badmouth his program. The men haven’t been relevant for 30 years; his program makes the tournament every year and would have this year without the injuries suffered.
That was a good look on Nika freshman year. It would send a message to Tennessee on Thursday that we are a tough bunch. Tonight's game once again showed we can give as much as we take in terms of physicality. We have a tough group of players.Yes, she admits it although tonight’s game was a good example of why it’s a smart idea.
I think Nika may have a black eye tomorrow. She got whacked in the face and the right side was red and puffy.
yes you did ,I saw it also.From the Magnificent Seven , we have morphed into the Effulgent Eight. All the ladies played well, and everyone got a respite. Good win and I did not see any injuries! I think I did see a "frick you" come from the mouth of our sweet Lou Two, too.
Doug Bruno ... angry at the referees
So, pick out a comparable program (urban campus, non power five, women’s ) and tell me who has outperformed him. I can’t think of one school that even comes close to his success. Your criticism is, in my opinion, totally without foundation, unless you start naming coaches who have done better in the same circumstance.Sorry if people don’t like it. He seems like a great guy, but his program is rarely relevant nationally, usually plays a style that good programs have little problem handling and he doesn’t seem to adapt. His camp might be top notch and do a lot for kids. I’m all for it. It has zero to with coaching competitive D1 hoops I don’t judge if it’s better or worse that a lot of schools don’t demand as much of the ladies’ teams as they do the men, but I guarantee you that DePaul gives Bruno more leeway than it does the men coaches. Arguably the men’s coaches generally face tougher competition overall. UConn men’s fans grumble about Hurley because they have lost early in the NCAA pointing to it as not acceptable. And the administration looks at such things. Bruno’s DePaul makes some NCAAs, they are not close to being a threat to ever win it. I made a simple statement. He is overrated compared to coaches at other programs and is never on the chopping block . Maybe that’s a better way for college sports, it also a fact. Harry Peretta was a legend who was given miles more rope than they would give any Villanova men’s team coach. If you want to have a serious discussion about how “big time” programs have different expectations for female hoops from male (changing at some schools) let‘s do it. A “dislike” is a cop out, which I appreciate you didn’t do. I never use the thumb’s down.
For the record I give Edwards the Badass and people can dislike it all they want.
A lot of those turn overs are account of the person shes passing to didnt go get the ball. Or there was a miscommunication. Being the point guard and being in charge of bringing the ball down is gonna make you more susceptible to turnovers.The bigger concern for me about Nika is her TOs. She's averaging nearly 4 per game since Thanksgiving, and those would haunt the Huskies vs. SC.
That was a good look on Nika freshman year. It would send a message to Tennessee on Thursday that we are a tough bunch. Tonight's game once again showed we can give as much as we take in terms of physicality. We have a tough group of players.
Boy I would love more off games like she had tonight 10 assists, should have been at least 15, 8 rebounds, and 2 blocks, plus most likely a nice shiner tomorrow.I know that DePaul is not a top tier team, however a lot of positives from the game. In my mind, AE laid claim to Big East player of the year award. The 3 that came in off the bench all contributed in their own way. Nika had an off game but didn't seem to hurt the Huskies all that much. Aubrey did Aubrey kind of things, things that other players just can't replicate. Dorka was solid as always and Lou is Lou.
See, you are picking out the drawbacks and not the opportunities. Obviously it started at a different time, but UConn was hardly a program anyone in their right mind would pick as the place where the most dominant team in female hoops history would spring up. In the boondocks, no history, going into a league with few teams having any national success.So, pick out a comparable program (urban campus, non power five, women’s ) and tell me who has outperformed him. I can’t think of one school that even comes close to his success. Your criticism is, in my opinion, totally without foundation, unless you start naming coaches who have done better in the same circumstance.
Doug Bruno most overrated coach this side of Andy Landers. If he’d been coaching a men’s program he would’ve been gone years ago. Pulls an upset once in a blue moon.
We can preach all we want, but the sinners need to repent.Boy I would love more off games like [Nika] had tonight
I don’t think you answered boreifs question.See, you are picking out the drawbacks and not the opportunities. Obviously it started at a different time, but UConn was hardly a program anyone in their right mind would pick as the place where the most dominant team in female hoops history would spring up. In the boondocks, no history, going into a league with few teams having any national success.
Do good players exist in Chicago hs hoops? Other urban areas where kids might not be troubled by an urban environment (Chicago is a pretty terrific city, could be used as a selling point). Chance to compete against UConn. The bottom half of most P5 leagues have historically not been very good.
More to my point, the DePaul men’s program exists in exactly the same situation that you say Bruno is stuck with. Same city , same league, everything The administration is not satisfied with making the NCAA sometimes or once in a while beating ”better” teams more often than the women’s program does. Prove he doesn’t get more leeway than the men’s coach. It’s a different standard. Not saying it’s worse, just different. Bruno competes in the world he competes in. The record is okay, but he doesn’t adjust to give his teams much chance to upset better teams. DePaul’s mens coaches would never survive.
I swear people don’t read. I said I’m not saying it’s better or worse, just fact that schools like DePaul and Villanova give far more leeway to women’s coaches than men’s coaches. Perretta is a perfect example. Do you really think that Jay Wright could‘ve lasted more than 5 years if every year he played a style that left his team better than the lower tier of the BE but rarely challenging the best teams, and pretty much never getting beyond round 1 or 2 of the Dance or not making it at all even with a winning record? Harry, same style over the years. , no real change in national potential. Good hs women’s hoops area to recruit from: same league as UConn and for years also ND and Rutgers to offer as opponents. Harry I actually think gave his kids a better chance to spring upsets than does Doug because his style could mess them up, way more than DePaul’s attempt to outscore really good teams.Absurd observation. So you must feel the same way about Harry Perretta who coached at Nova for 42 years. Some of these coaches are great teachers and game strategists but they just don't get the very best players year in and year out. I always wondered how Harry or Doug (Or many others) would have done had they the same talent pool that Geno has had. I don't think that's diminishing Geno because in College you have to be able to do it all to win it all (And recruiting is a vital part of that).
Yeah, he’s only made the ncaa tournament 24 times, winning at least one game in the tournament in 13 of those appearances, and basically sweeping the regular season and big east tournament titles when Uconn was in the AAC.See, you are picking out the drawbacks and not the opportunities. Obviously it started at a different time, but UConn was hardly a program anyone in their right mind would pick as the place where the most dominant team in female hoops history would spring up. In the boondocks, no history, going into a league with few teams having any national success.
Do good players exist in Chicago hs hoops? Other urban areas where kids might not be troubled by an urban environment (Chicago is a pretty terrific city, could be used as a selling point). Chance to compete against UConn. The bottom half of most P5 leagues have historically not been very good.
More to my point, the DePaul men’s program exists in exactly the same situation that you say Bruno is stuck with. Same city , same league, everything The administration is not satisfied with making the NCAA sometimes or once in a while beating ”better” teams more often than the women’s program does. Prove he doesn’t get more leeway than the men’s coach. It’s a different standard. Not saying it’s worse, just different. Bruno competes in the world he competes in. The record is okay, but he doesn’t adjust to give his teams much chance to upset better teams. DePaul’s mens coaches would never survive.