- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,381
- Reaction Score
- 23,714
I think you're right, and I think that's fair. But at the same time, the wording and even the sentiment behind the wording is very naive on his part, and he's been in this job long enough that he really doesn't have a good excuse for being naive.
I get that the program is in a bad way, and that sucks. But there's no real excuse for the on the field performance being as bad as it's been for as long as it's been. It's bad football, resulting from bad recruiting and coaching, resulting from bad coaching hires. All of that is on the athletic department, though not necessarily DB himself.
It's asinine to think a packed house will result in a successful program. That's simply not how it works. It'd influence a win every now and again, sure. But it's putting the cart before the horse.
Completely agree with your first two paragraphs. With regards to the effect attendance has on success, my thought was that everything can at some point be traced back to revenue and demand. Players win games, but fans - directly or indirectly - make them want to come here (it works the other way as well).